IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i6p1061-d216739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Healthy City Performance Awards Lead to Health in All Policies? A Case of Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Nuan-Ching Huang

    (Healthy Cities Research Center, Research and Services Headquarters, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan)

  • Hsien-Wen Kuo

    (Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, No.155, Sec.2, Linong Street, Taipei 112, Taiwan)

  • Te-Jen Hung

    (BeiTou Culture Foundation, No.45-1, Sec. 1, Zhongyang S. Rd., Beitou Dist., Taipei City 112, Taiwan)

  • Susan C. Hu

    (Healthy Cities Research Center, Research and Services Headquarters, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan
    Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No.1, University Road, Tainan City 701, Taiwan)

Abstract

The Healthy Cities (HC) Project, which was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1986, has been recognized as the best setting approach for health promotion. However, very few studies have addressed how to use HC approaches to establish public policies in non-health departments in cities. This paper describes the strategies for the HC Performance Awards used in Taiwan to draw attention from different departments and to sustain intersectoral collaboration for the purpose of establishing Health in All Policies (HiAP). The methods include: (1) setting up the Taiwan Healthy City Alliance; (2) establishing HC Innovation Performance Awards; (3) reviewing the award applications according to seven criteria; and (4) analyzing the topic content of the award applications. We collected 961 HC award applications during 2013–2016 to analyze their content. The results showed that the number of applications increased nearly every year while significantly more non-health departments applied for the awards compared to health departments (73.3% vs. 26.7%). The award rates of non-health departments have also increased twice from 13.9% in 2013 to 25.8% in 2016. By examining the topics of the award winners, we concluded that “HC Innovation Performance Awards” indeed provide a role and opportunity for political involvement, intersectoral collaboration, co-opetition and capacity building that is necessary for establishing health in all policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuan-Ching Huang & Hsien-Wen Kuo & Te-Jen Hung & Susan C. Hu, 2019. "Do Healthy City Performance Awards Lead to Health in All Policies? A Case of Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1061-:d:216739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1061/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1061/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steenbakkers, Mieke & Jansen, Maria & Maarse, Hans & de Vries, Nanne, 2012. "Challenging Health in All Policies, an action research study in Dutch municipalities," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 288-295.
    2. Agnes Molnar & Emilie Renahy & Patricia O’Campo & Carles Muntaner & Alix Freiler & Ketan Shankardass, 2016. "Using Win-Win Strategies to Implement Health in All Policies: A Cross-Case Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Storm, Ilse & Harting, Janneke & Stronks, Karien & Schuit, Albertine J., 2014. "Measuring stages of health in all policies on a local level: The applicability of a maturity model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 183-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guglielmin, Maria & Muntaner, Carles & O’Campo, Patricia & Shankardass, Ketan, 2018. "A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 284-292.
    2. Jonas Bech Andersen & Gabriel Gulis, 2017. "Community maturity to implement Health in All Policies," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(5), pages 605-612, June.
    3. Peters, D.T.J.M. & Verweij, S. & Grêaux, K. & Stronks, K. & Harting, J., 2017. "Conditions for addressing environmental determinants of health behavior in intersectoral policy networks: A fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 34-41.
    4. Stéphanie Gamache & Thierno Amadou Diallo & Ketan Shankardass & Alexandre Lebel, 2020. "The Elaboration of an Intersectoral Partnership to Perform Health Impact Assessment in Urban Planning: The Experience of Quebec City (Canada)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Eike Quilling & Birgit Babitsch & Kevin Dadaczynski & Stefanie Kruse & Maja Kuchler & Heike Köckler & Janna Leimann & Ulla Walter & Christina Plantz, 2020. "Municipal Health Promotion as Part of Urban Health: A Policy Framework for Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-10, August.
    6. Gesa Lehne & Claudia Voelcker-Rehage & Jochen Meyer & Karin Bammann & Dirk Gansefort & Tanja Brüchert & Gabriele Bolte, 2019. "Equity Impact Assessment of Interventions to Promote Physical Activity among Older Adults: A Logic Model Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Yannai Kranzler & Yael Parag & Nadav Davidovitch, 2019. "Public Health from the Middle-Out: A New Analytical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Paul Cairney & Sean Kippin & Emily St Denny & Heather Mitchell, 2022. "Policy design for territorial equity in multi‐level and multi‐sectoral political systems: Comparing health and education strategies," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 1051-1061, October.
    9. Tanja Brüchert & Paula Quentin & Sabine Baumgart & Gabriele Bolte, 2021. "Barriers, Facilitating Factors, and Intersectoral Collaboration for Promoting Active Mobility for Healthy Aging—A Qualitative Study within Local Government in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Eike Quilling & Stefanie Kruse & Maja Kuchler & Janna Leimann & Ulla Walter, 2020. "Models of Intersectoral Cooperation in Municipal Health Promotion and Prevention: Findings from a Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-11, August.
    11. Friel, Sharon & Townsend, Belinda & Fisher, Matthew & Harris, Patrick & Freeman, Toby & Baum, Fran, 2021. "Power and the people's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Storm, Ilse & Harting, Janneke & Stronks, Karien & Schuit, Albertine J., 2014. "Measuring stages of health in all policies on a local level: The applicability of a maturity model," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 183-191.
    13. Liz Green & Kathryn Ashton & Mark A. Bellis & Timo Clemens & Margaret Douglas, 2021. "‘Health in All Policies’—A Key Driver for Health and Well-Being in a Post-COVID-19 Pandemic World," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Hendriks, Anna-Marie & Habraken, Jolanda & Jansen, Maria W.J. & Gubbels, Jessica S. & De Vries, Nanne K. & van Oers, Hans & Michie, Susan & Atkins, L. & Kremers, Stef P.J., 2014. "‘Are we there yet?’ – Operationalizing the concept of Integrated Public Health Policies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 174-182.
    15. Ellen Strøm Synnevåg, 2022. "Evaluating ‘Health in All Policies’ in Norwegian Municipalities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, June.
    16. Natascha J. E. van Vooren & Hanneke W. Drewes & Esther de Weger & Inge M. B. Bongers & Caroline A. Baan, 2020. "Cross-Sector Collaboration for a Healthy Living Environment—Which Strategies to Implement, Why, and in Which Context?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1061-:d:216739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.