IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i5p835-d211914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevance Proof of Safety Culture in Coal Mine Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Jiang

    (College of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, Nathan campus, Griffith University,170 Kessels Road, Nathan, Brisbane, Queensland 4111, Australia)

  • Chunyang Liang

    (College of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Wei Han

    (College of Emergency Management & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

This paper intends to use data to verify the correlation between safety culture, safety management system and safety knowledge, safety awareness, and safety habits, which is the correlation between the various parts of the behavior safety “2-4” model. Due to data limitations, the results are limited to the study of safety culture related relationships in coal mining enterprises. This paper first designed a questionnaire containing 30 questions, of which 1–5 questions represent safety culture, 6–22 questions represent safety management system, and 23–30 questions represent safety knowledge, safety awareness and safety habits. Employees of 27 coal mining enterprises in Shandong, Henan, Hunan and other places in China were surveyed and sampled by stratified random sampling, and 1514 valid questionnaires were obtained. After item analysis and correlation analysis, and it was found that, within the data of 1514 questionnaires, the item total correlation coefficients of questions 6, 9, 19 and 28 were all less than 0.2, indicating that the identification degree of these four items was poor, which was deleted. Using the data analysis of the remaining 26 questions in the questionnaire, it was found that the relationship between safety culture and the safety management system, the safety management system and safety knowledge, and safety awareness and safety habits is moderately related; safety culture and safety knowledge, safety awareness and safety habits are weakly related. The conclusion shows that the safety culture directly affects the safety management system; the safety management system directly affects the safety knowledge, safety awareness and safety habits; the safety culture indirectly affects safety knowledge, safety awareness and safety habits. However, why the expected strong correlation is not achieved, and whether the same conclusion can be obtained if the data scale is expanded or other types of enterprises are added for questionnaire measurement, these are questions worthy of further study, which is also the author’s next research content.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Jiang & Chunyang Liang & Wei Han, 2019. "Relevance Proof of Safety Culture in Coal Mine Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:5:p:835-:d:211914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/5/835/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/5/835/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank W. Guldenmund, 2010. "(Mis)understanding Safety Culture and Its Relationship to Safety Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(10), pages 1466-1480, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuai Han & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long, 2020. "Who Reports Low Interactive Psychology Status? An Investigation Based on Chinese Coal Miners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Ismail, Siti Noraishah & Ramli, Azizan, 2023. "Investigate the factors affecting safety culture in the Malaysian mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ying Li & Xiaowen Zhao & Xue Zhang & Chi Zhang & Hongkun Ma & Mingli Jiao & Xia Li & Lijun Gao & Mo Hao & Jun Lv & Yanming Zhao & Yu Cui & Jinghua Liu & Zhaoquan Huang & Wuxiang Shi & Qunhong Wu & Mei, 2017. "Validation study of the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) in public hospitals of Heilongjiang province, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Sandra A. Bakidamteh & Enoch Teye-Kwadjo & Inusah Abdul-Nasiru, 2022. "Understanding the Role of Proactive Personality in Occupational Health and Safety at Oil and Gas Service Stations in Accra," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    3. Yanbing Chen & Conor Buggy & Seamus Kelly, 2022. "Managing the Wellbeing of Elite Rugby Union Players from an Occupational Safety and Health Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Tzu Yang Loh & Mario P. Brito & Neil Bose & Jingjing Xu & Kiril Tenekedjiev, 2020. "Fuzzy System Dynamics Risk Analysis (FuSDRA) of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Operations in the Antarctic," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 818-841, April.
    5. Fanny Yam & Chih Siong Wong & Cheah Yuat Hoong & Mansoureh Ebrahimi, 2017. "Shaping the Culture of Safety through Effective Leadership in Malaysia," Asian Culture and History, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1, September.
    6. Sanne, Johan M., 2012. "Learning from adverse events in the nuclear power industry: Organizational learning, policy making and normalization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 239-250.
    7. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, 2020. "Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture: Its Essence and a Concept for Its Operationalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:5:p:835-:d:211914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.