IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p504-d204964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeated Measures Regression in Laboratory, Clinical and Environmental Research: Common Misconceptions in the Matter of Different Within- and Between-Subject Slopes

Author

Listed:
  • Donald R. Hoover

    (Department of Statistics and Biostatistics and Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)

  • Qiuhu Shi

    (School of Health Sciences and Practice, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA)

  • Igor Burstyn

    (Environmental and Occupational Health Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA)

  • Kathryn Anastos

    (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467, USA)

Abstract

When using repeated measures linear regression models to make causal inference in laboratory, clinical and environmental research, it is typically assumed that the within-subject association of differences (or changes) in predictor variable values across replicates is the same as the between-subject association of differences in those predictor variable values. However, this is often false. For example, with body weight as the predictor variable and blood cholesterol (which increases with higher body fat) as the outcome: (i) a 10-lb. weight increase in the same adult affects more greatly an increase in cholesterol in that adult than does (ii) one adult weighing 10 lbs. more than a second indicate higher cholesterol in the heavier adult. A 10-lb. weight gain in the first adult more likely reflects a build-up of body fat in that person, while a second person being 10 lbs. heavier than the first could be influenced by other factors, such as the second person being taller. Hence, to make causal inferences, different within- and between-subject slopes should be separately modeled. A related misconception commonly made using generalized estimation equations (GEE) and mixed models on repeated measures (i.e., for fitting cross-sectional regression) is that the working correlation structure only influences variance of the parameter estimates. However, only independence working correlation guarantees that the modeled parameters have interpretability. We illustrate this with an example where changing the working correlation from independence to equicorrelation qualitatively biases parameters of GEE models and show that this happens because within- and between-subject slopes for the outcomes regressed on the predictor variables differ. We then systematically describe several common mechanisms that cause within- and between-subject slopes to differ: change effects, lag/reverse-lag and spillover causality, shared within-subject measurement bias or confounding, and predictor variable measurement error. The misconceptions we describe should be better publicized. Repeated measures analyses should compare within- and between-subject slopes of predictors and when they do differ, investigate the causal reasons for this.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald R. Hoover & Qiuhu Shi & Igor Burstyn & Kathryn Anastos, 2019. "Repeated Measures Regression in Laboratory, Clinical and Environmental Research: Common Misconceptions in the Matter of Different Within- and Between-Subject Slopes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:504-:d:204964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/504/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/504/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Cui, 2007. "QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 7(2), pages 209-220, June.
    2. Gosho, Masahiko, 2014. "Criteria to Select a Working Correlation Structure in SAS," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 57(c01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szmaragd, Camille & Clarke, Paul & Steele, Fiona, 2013. "Subject specific and population average models for binary longitudinal data: a tutorial," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 52199, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Hassan, Mahmoud & Oueslati, Walid & Rousselière, Damien, 2020. "Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: an empirical analysis of panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    3. Inmyung Song & Hye-Jae Lee, 2022. "Predictors of subjective well-being in Korean men and women: Analysis of nationwide panel survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Jack DeWaard & Keuntae Kim & James Raymer, 2012. "Migration Systems in Europe: Evidence From Harmonized Flow Data," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1307-1333, November.
    5. Oluwakemi Olanike Aderibigbe & Shannon L. Stewart & John P. Hirdes & Christopher Perlman, 2022. "Substance Use among Youth in Community and Residential Mental Health Care Facilities in Ontario, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Aristides dos Santos, Anderson Moreira & Perelman, Julian & Jacinto, Paulo de Andrade & Tejada, Cesar Augusto Oviedo & Barros, Aluísio J.D. & Bertoldi, Andréa D. & Matijasevich, Alicia & Santos, Iná S, 2019. "Income-related inequality and inequity in children’s health care: A longitudinal analysis using data from Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 127-137.
    7. Fischer, Caroline & Schott, Carina, 2020. "Why People Enter and Stay in Public Service Careers: The Role of Parental Socialization and an Interest in Politics," OSF Preprints yb8e3, Center for Open Science.
    8. Irina Chis Ster & Hamzah F Niaz & Martha E Chico & Yisela Oviedo & Maritza Vaca & Philip J Cooper, 2021. "The epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminth infections in children up to 8 years of age: Findings from an Ecuadorian birth cohort," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Cheick Haïballa Kounta & Luis Sagaon-Teyssier & Pierre-Julien Coulaud & Marion Mora & Gwenaelle Maradan & Michel Bourrelly & Abdoul Aziz Keita & Stéphane-Alain Babo Yoro & Camille Anoma & Christian Co, 2019. "Transactional sex among men who have sex with men participating in the CohMSM prospective cohort study in West Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Wang, You-Gan & Hin, Lin-Yee, 2010. "Modeling strategies in longitudinal data analysis: Covariate, variance function and correlation structure selection," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3359-3370, December.
    11. Banerjee, Saikat & Karna, Amit & Sharma, Sunil, 2022. "Imprinting effects of exposure to the Indian independence movement on export intensity of firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 548-557.
    12. Woncheol Jang, 2013. "Generalized Estimating Equations by HARDIN, J. W. and HIBE, J. M," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 799-799, September.
    13. D. T. Nava & F. De Bastiani & M. A. Uribe-Opazo & O. Nicolis & M. Galea, 2017. "Local Influence for Spatially Correlated Binomial Data: An Application to the Spodoptera frugiperda Infestation in Corn," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 22(4), pages 540-561, December.
    14. Fabian Ernst & David Bendig & Lea Puechel, 2024. "Religion in Family Firms: A Socioemotional Wealth Perspective on Top-Level Executives with Perceived Religiosity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(3), pages 707-730, October.
    15. Antonio Filippin, 2013. "The Effect of .99 Price Endings on Consumer Demand: An Example of Confounding Factors Surviving in Field Experiments," Journal of Economics and Management, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taiwan, vol. 9(2), pages 211-229, July.
    16. Masiano, Steven P. & Kawende, Bienvenu & Ravelomanana, Noro Lantoniaina Rosa & Green, Tiffany L. & Dahman, Bassam & Thirumurthy, Harsha & Kimmel, April D. & Yotebieng, Marcel, 2023. "Economic costs and cost-effectiveness of conditional cash transfers for the uptake of services for the prevention of vertical HIV transmissions in a resource-limited setting," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    17. Maximilian Goethner & Sebastian Luettig & Tobias Regner, 2021. "Crowdinvesting in entrepreneurial projects: disentangling patterns of investor behavior," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 905-926, August.
    18. Jana Oehmichen & Sebastian Firk & Michael Wolff & Franz Maybuechen, 2021. "Standing out from the crowd: Dedicated institutional investors and strategy uniqueness," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1083-1108, June.
    19. Gregory N. Price & Juliet U. Elu, 2014. "Does regional currency integration ameliorate global macroeconomic shocks in sub-Saharan Africa? The case of the 2008-2009 global financial crisis," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 41(5), pages 737-750, September.
    20. Koschmann, Anthony & Bowman, Douglas, 2018. "Evaluating marketplace synergies of ingredient brand alliances," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 575-590.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:504-:d:204964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.