IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p430-d202964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education Policy for Migrant Children in Thailand and How It Really Happens; A Case Study of Ranong Province, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Titiporn Tuangratananon

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
    Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Rapeepong Suphanchaimat

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
    Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Sataporn Julchoo

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Pigunkaew Sinam

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Weerasak Putthasri

    (National Health Commission office, National Health Building, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

Abstract

Health and education are interrelated, and it is for this reason that we studied the education of migrant children. The Thai Government has ratified ‘rights’ to education for all children in Thailand since 2005. However, there are gaps in knowledge concerning the implementation of education policy for migrants, such as whether and to what extent migrant children receive education services according to policy intentions. The objective of this study is to explore the implementation of education policy for migrants and the factors that determine education choices among them. A cross-sectional qualitative design was applied. The main data collection technique was in-depth interviews with 34 key informants. Thematic analysis with an intersectionality approach was used. Ranong province was selected as the main study site. Results found that Migrant Learning Centers (MLCs) were the preferable choice for most migrant children instead of Thai Public Schools (TPSs), even though MLCs were not recognized as formal education sites. The main reason for choosing MLCs was because MLCs provided a more culturally sensitive service. Teaching in MLCs was done in Myanmar’s language and the MLCs offer a better chance to pursue higher education in Myanmar if migrants migrate back to their homeland. However, MLCs still face budget and human resources inadequacies. School health promotion was underserviced in MLCs compared to TPSs. Dental service was underserviced in most MLCs and TPSs. Implicit discrimination against migrant children was noted. The Thai Government should view MLCs as allies in expanding education coverage to all children in the Thai territory. A participatory public policy process that engages all stakeholders, including education officials, health care providers, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), MLCs’ representatives, and migrants themselves is needed to improve the education standards of MLCs, keeping their culturally-sensitive strengths.

Suggested Citation

  • Titiporn Tuangratananon & Rapeepong Suphanchaimat & Sataporn Julchoo & Pigunkaew Sinam & Weerasak Putthasri, 2019. "Education Policy for Migrant Children in Thailand and How It Really Happens; A Case Study of Ranong Province, Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:430-:d:202964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/430/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/430/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Bryant, 2005. "Children of International Migrants in Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines: A review of evidence and policies," Papers inwopa05/32, Innocenti Working Papers.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang Sophie Xuefei, 2014. "The Effect of Parental Migration on the Educational Attainment of Their Left-Behind Children in Rural China," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(3), pages 1037-1080, July.
    2. Isabel Ortiz & Matthew Cummins, 2012. "L’Inégalité Mondiale: La Répartition des Revenus dans 141 Pays," Working papers 1103, UNICEF,Division of Policy and Strategy.
    3. Lu, Jingjing & Lin, Leesa & Roy, Brita & Riley, Carley & Wang, Emily & Wang, Karen & Li, Lu & Wang, Feng & Zhou, Xudong, 2020. "The impacts of parent-child communication on left-behind children’s mental health and suicidal ideation: A cross sectional study in Anhui," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Francesca Marchetta, 2012. "The Impact of Migration on the Labor Markets in the Arab Mediterranean Countries," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1230001-121, January.
    5. Luo, Xiaoman, 2020. "How Does Parental Out-migration Affect Left-behind Children’s Schooling Outcomes? – Effect Sizes and Mechanisms," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304495, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Leonardo Menchini & Gerry Redmond, 2006. "Child Consumption Poverty in South-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States," Papers inwopa06/36, Innocenti Working Papers.
    7. Kumar, Sneha, 2021. "Offspring's labor migration and its implications for elderly parents' emotional wellbeing in Indonesia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Robert Holzmann & Jacques Wels, 2020. "The cross‐border portability of social security benefits: Status and progress?," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 73(1), pages 65-97, January.
    9. Pajaron, Marjorie & Latinazo, Cara T. & Trinidad, Enrico G., 2020. "The children are alright: Revisiting the impact of parental migration in the Philippines," GLO Discussion Paper Series 507, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Kristina A. Schapiro, 2009. "Migration and Educational Outcomes of Children," Human Development Research Papers (2009 to present) HDRP-2009-57, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), revised Oct 2009.
    11. Sha Ma & Minmin Jiang & Feng Wang & Jingjing Lu & Lu Li & Therese Hesketh, 2019. "Left-Behind Children and Risk of Unintentional Injury in Rural China—A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-9, January.
    12. Anas, Yulia & Alisjahbana, Armida & Purnagunawan, Rd. M. & Fahmi, Mohamad, 2022. "The Effect of Parental Internal Migration on Children’s Education: Evidence from Indonesia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 56(2), pages 115-127.
    13. Holzmann, Robert & Wels, Jacques, 2018. "Status and Progress in Cross-Border Portability of Social Security Benefits," IZA Discussion Papers 11481, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Tiza, Fahana Tahi & Farid, Kazi Shek & Mozumdar, Lavlu, 2020. "Impact Of Remittances On Educational Attainment Of The Migrant Households: A Micro Level Study," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 40(1&2), February.
    15. Monika Priyadarshani Wijeratne & Rohini Seneviratne & Nalika Gunawardena & Catherine Lynch & Ingvild Fossgard Sandøy & Truls Ostbye, 2014. "Correlates of Peer Violence Among 13- to 15-Year-Olds in Gampaha District Schools in Sri Lanka," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(3), pages 21582440145, September.
    16. Minhui Zhou & Rachel Murphy & Ran Tao, 2014. "Effects of Parents' Migration on the Education of Children Left Behind in Rural China," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 40(2), pages 273-292, June.
    17. Zhao, Chenyue & Zhou, Xudong & Wang, Feng & Jiang, Minmin & Hesketh, Therese, 2017. "Care for left-behind children in rural China: A realist evaluation of a community-based intervention," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 239-245.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:430-:d:202964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.