IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5009-d295933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Dust Exposures and Health and Safety Practices among Western Australian Wheatbelt Farmers during Harvest

Author

Listed:
  • Krassi Rumchev

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6148, Australia)

  • Suzanne Gilbey

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6148, Australia)

  • Ryan Mead-Hunter

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6148, Australia)

  • Linda Selvey

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6148, Australia
    School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia)

  • Kevin Netto

    (School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth 6148, Australia)

  • Ben Mullins

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6148, Australia)

Abstract

Background: Agricultural farmworkers are routinely exposed to high levels of airborne dust particles that have been linked to adverse health outcomes. Methods: This study measured personal and environmental exposures to dust particulates by farmworkers during harvesting activities. Farmers completed a workplace survey with regards to their health and safety awareness and practices and researchers observed general farm safety practices on selected farms using a checklist. Results: In this study, farmers were noted to commonly work extended hours and shifts during harvest due to rigid timing deadlines. Results showed that 40% of farmers were exposed to concentrations of inhalable particles greater than SafeWork Australia’s workplace exposure standards for grain dusts, assuming a 16 h working day over 5 shifts. Twenty-two percent were exposed to concentrations that were above the adjusted standard for 12 h shifts. Survey results showed that three-quarters of farm owners provided new workers with some type of induction related to farm safety, however this was mostly undertaken in an arbitrary manner. Despite noting that farming was a dusty occupation and reporting to use protective measures to reduce harmful dust exposures, no workers were observed to wear respiratory protection when working outside of the protection of a vehicle cabin. Conclusion: This study identified substantial gaps in health and safety knowledge among farm managers and workers, and improved education and training are highly recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Krassi Rumchev & Suzanne Gilbey & Ryan Mead-Hunter & Linda Selvey & Kevin Netto & Ben Mullins, 2019. "Agricultural Dust Exposures and Health and Safety Practices among Western Australian Wheatbelt Farmers during Harvest," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5009-:d:295933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei He & Nan Jin & Huaxin Deng & Qi Zhao & Fang Yuan & Fengqiong Chen & Huadong Zhang & Xiaoni Zhong, 2022. "Workers’ Occupational Dust Exposure and Pulmonary Function Assessment: Cross-Sectional Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Emily Terese Sturm & Colton Castro & Andrea Mendez-Colmenares & John Duffy & Agnieszka (Aga) Z. Burzynska & Lorann Stallones & Michael L. Thomas, 2022. "Risk Factors for Brain Health in Agricultural Work: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-26, March.
    3. David A. Fleming‐Muñoz & Stuart Whitten & Graham D. Bonnett, 2023. "The economics of drought: A review of impacts and costs," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(4), pages 501-523, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5009-:d:295933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.