IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4812-d292517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation and Long-Term Outcomes of Organisational Health Literacy Interventions in Ireland and The Netherlands: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marise Kaper

    (Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, FA10, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Jane Sixsmith

    (Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Louise Meijering

    (Population Research Center, Urban and Regional Studies Institute, University of Groningen, Landleven 1, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Janine Vervoordeldonk

    (Health Impact Gezondheid & Zorg, Blinkertlaan 7, Dishoek, 4371 PV Veere, The Netherlands)

  • Priscilla Doyle

    (Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Margaret M. Barry

    (Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Andrea F. de Winter

    (Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, FA10, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Sijmen A. Reijneveld

    (Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, P.O. Box 30.001, FA10, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Organisational Health Literacy (OHL)-interventions are needed to overcome health inequality. OHL-interventions have successfully identified communication barriers at the organisational level, but evidence is limited on the extent to which this leads to sustainable organisational change. This study aims to assess the implementation fidelity, moderators (barriers and facilitators), and long-term impact of OHL-interventions in hospitals in Ireland and The Netherlands. We used a longitudinal mixed-methods approach to assess two similar OHL-interventions in one Irish and three Dutch hospitals. The OHL-interventions concerned the improvement of navigation and implementation of health literacy-friendly communication throughout organisations. Participants were 24 hospital employees and 40 older adults who use hospital services. At six, eight, and eighteen months, we assessed the level of implementation, barriers and facilitators, and impact through questionnaires and in-depth semi-structured interviews. After older adults and professionals had identified a number of communication problems, we found that professionals had successfully implemented OHL-interventions to promote navigation and comprehensible communication. Limited resources and variation in organisational structures and procedures were perceived as barriers to implementation. The participation of service users, leadership support, and a stepwise implementation of interventions were perceived to facilitate implementation. In the long term, the OHL-interventions led to system-wide improvements, as shown by better embedding of health literacy policies, enhanced patient engagement, provision of plain language training and comprehensible information. Findings were similar for the two countries. Embedded OHL-interventions resulted in sustainable and system-wide health literacy changes in all four hospitals. Following implementation, OHL-interventions have the potential to promote health equity and empowerment among health service users.

Suggested Citation

  • Marise Kaper & Jane Sixsmith & Louise Meijering & Janine Vervoordeldonk & Priscilla Doyle & Margaret M. Barry & Andrea F. de Winter & Sijmen A. Reijneveld, 2019. "Implementation and Long-Term Outcomes of Organisational Health Literacy Interventions in Ireland and The Netherlands: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4812-:d:292517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liesbeth de Wit & Pania Karnaki & Archontoula Dalma & Peter Csizmadia & Charlotte Salter & Andrea de Winter & Louise Meijering, 2020. "Health Literacy in the Everyday Lives of Older Adults in Greece, Hungary, and the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Elham Charoghchian Khorasani & Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany & Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh & Hassan Doosti & Hadi Tehrani & Mohammad Moghzi & Alireza Jafari & Nooshin Peyman, 2022. "Attributes of Organizational Health Literacy in Health Care Centers in Iran: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Marise S. Kaper & Jane Sixsmith & Sijmen A. Reijneveld & Andrea F. de Winter, 2021. "Outcomes and Critical Factors for Successful Implementation of Organizational Health Literacy Interventions: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Carel J. M. Jansen & Ruth Koops van ’t Jagt & Sijmen A. Reijneveld & Ellen van Leeuwen & Andrea F. de Winter & John C. J. Hoeks, 2021. "Improving Health Literacy Responsiveness: A Randomized Study on the Uptake of Brochures on Doctor-Patient Communication in Primary Health Care Waiting Rooms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Tetine Sentell & Sandra Vamos & Orkan Okan, 2020. "Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Health Literacy Research Around the World: More Important Than Ever in a Time of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Johanna Sophie Lubasch & Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz & Nicole Ernstmann & Christoph Kowalski & Anna Levke Brütt & Lena Ansmann, 2021. "Organizational Health Literacy in a Hospital—Insights on the Patients’ Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4812-:d:292517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.