Author
Listed:
- José Manuel Hernández-Padilla
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain
Adult, Child and Midwifery Department, School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UK)
- Alda Elena Cortés-Rodríguez
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain)
- José Granero-Molina
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain
Adult, Child and Midwifery Department, School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UK
Associate Researcher, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4780000, Chile)
- Cayetano Fernández-Sola
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain
Adult, Child and Midwifery Department, School of Health and Education, Middlesex University, London NW4 4BT, UK
Associate Researcher, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4780000, Chile)
- Matías Correa-Casado
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain)
- Isabel María Fernández-Medina
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain)
- María Mar López-Rodríguez
(Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Almeria, 04007 Almería, Spain)
Abstract
Nursing students experience difficulties when communicating in clinical practice. Their self-efficacy in clinical communication should be explored as part of their competence assessment before they are exposed to real human interactions in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to design and psychometrically evaluate a toolkit to comprehensively assess nursing students’ self-efficacy in clinical communication. The study followed an observational cross-sectional design. A sample of 365 nursing students participated in the study. The ‘Clinical Communication Self-Efficacy Toolkit’ (CC-SET) was comprised of three tools: the ‘Patient-Centered Communication Self-efficacy Scale’ (PCC-SES), the ‘Patient clinical Information Exchange and interprofessional communication Self-Efficacy Scale’ (PIE-SES), and the ‘Intrapersonal communication and Self-Reflection Self-Efficacy Scale’ (ISR-SES). The tools’ reliability, validity (content, criterion, and construct) and usability were rigorously tested. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the three tools comprising the CC-SET was very high and demonstrated their excellent reliability (PCC-SES = 0.93; PIE-SES = 0.87; ISR-SES = 0.86). The three tools evidenced to have excellent content validity (scales’ content validity index > 0.95) and very good criterion validity. Construct validity analysis demonstrated that the PCC-SES, PIE-SES, and ISR-SES have a clear and theoretically-congruent structure. The CC-SET is a comprehensive toolkit that allows the assessment of nursing students’ self-efficacy in interpersonal, interprofessional, and intrapersonal communication.
Suggested Citation
José Manuel Hernández-Padilla & Alda Elena Cortés-Rodríguez & José Granero-Molina & Cayetano Fernández-Sola & Matías Correa-Casado & Isabel María Fernández-Medina & María Mar López-Rodríguez, 2019.
"Design and Psychometric Evaluation of the ‘Clinical Communication Self-Efficacy Toolkit’,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4534-:d:287618
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4534-:d:287618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.