IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i21p4220-d281996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinician Perspectives on mRehab Interventions and Technologies for People with Disabilities in the United States: A National Survey

Author

Listed:
  • John Morris

    (Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA)

  • Mike Jones

    (Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA)

  • Nicole Thompson

    (Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA)

  • Tracey Wallace

    (Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA)

  • Frank DeRuyter

    (Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA)

Abstract

Mobile health and mobile rehabilitation (mHealth and mRehab) services and technologies have attracted considerable interest from healthcare providers, technology vendors, rehabilitation engineers, investors and policy makers in recent years. Successful adoption and use of mHealth/mRehab requires clinician support and engagement, including the ability to identify appropriate use cases and possible barriers to use for themselves and their patients, and acquire adequate knowledge and confidence using mHealth/mRehab interventions. This article reports results from a survey of rehabilitation clinicians in the United States on their attitudes, experience, expectations and concerns regarding mHealth/mRehab interventions and technologies. Over 500 clinicians in physical, occupational, speech, recreation and psychological therapy professions, among others, participated in the survey. Respondents reported that an overwhelming majority of their patients need additional therapy after discharge from inpatient environments, and over half of outpatients need additional therapy between visits. A large majority reported prescribing specific exercises and interventions for patients to work on outside of the clinic. However, only 51% reported being comfortable integrating mRehab technology into their practice; and only 23% feel knowledgeable about rehabilitation technology currently available. Technologies to support mRehab are maturing rapidly. Clinicians recognize the need for mRehab, but their knowledge and confidence prescribing mRehab represents a significant barrier to adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • John Morris & Mike Jones & Nicole Thompson & Tracey Wallace & Frank DeRuyter, 2019. "Clinician Perspectives on mRehab Interventions and Technologies for People with Disabilities in the United States: A National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4220-:d:281996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Jones & John Morris & Frank Deruyter, 2018. "Mobile Healthcare and People with Disabilities: Current State and Future Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T. Bradley Willingham & Julie Stowell & George Collier & Deborah Backus, 2024. "Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Expand Accessibility and Improve Precision in Rehabilitation and Exercise for People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Tuija Heiskanen & Hanna Rinne & Sari Miettinen & Anna-Liisa Salminen, 2021. "Uptake of Tele-Rehabilitation in Finland amongst Rehabilitation Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Shannon B. Juengst & Lauren Terhorst & Andrew Nabasny & Tracey Wallace & Jennifer A. Weaver & Candice L. Osborne & Suzanne Perea Burns & Brittany Wright & Pey-Shan Wen & Chung-Lin Novelle Kew & John M, 2021. "Use of mHealth Technology for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Adults with Acquired Brain Injuries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Bradley Willingham & Julie Stowell & George Collier & Deborah Backus, 2024. "Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Expand Accessibility and Improve Precision in Rehabilitation and Exercise for People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, January.
    2. Shannon B. Juengst & Lauren Terhorst & Andrew Nabasny & Tracey Wallace & Jennifer A. Weaver & Candice L. Osborne & Suzanne Perea Burns & Brittany Wright & Pey-Shan Wen & Chung-Lin Novelle Kew & John M, 2021. "Use of mHealth Technology for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Community-Dwelling Adults with Acquired Brain Injuries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Erin Radcliffe & Ben Lippincott & Raeda Anderson & Mike Jones, 2021. "A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Mike Jones & Frank DeRuyter & John Morris, 2020. "The Digital Health Revolution and People with Disabilities: Perspective from the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Brooks C. Wingo & James H. Rimmer, 2018. "Emerging Trends in Health Promotion for People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-2, April.
    6. Melissa N. Savage, 2023. "Supporting Healthier Grocery-Shopping Habits for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Using Self-Management and Technology: A Single-Case Pilot," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4220-:d:281996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.