IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i1p162-d195914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of the Contributory Factors to the Guessability of Traffic Signs

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Liu

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Huiying Wen

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Dianchen Zhu

    (School of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
    Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Wesley Kumfer

    (Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, 730 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Suite 300, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3430, USA)

Abstract

Traffic signs play an important role in traffic management systems. A variety of studies have focused on drivers’ comprehension of traffic signs. However, the travel safety of prospective users, which has been rarely mentioned in previous studies, has attracted considerable attention from relevant departments in China. With the growth of international and interregional travel demand, traffic signs should be designed more universally to reduce the potential risks to drivers. To identify key factors that improve prospective users’ sign comprehension, this study investigated eight factors that may affect users’ performance regarding sign guessing. Two hundred and one Chinese students, all of whom intended to be drivers and none of whom had experience with daily driving after obtaining a license or visits to Germany, guessed the meanings and rated the sign features of 54 signs. We investigated the effects of selected user factors on their sign guessing performance. Additionally, the contributions of four cognitive design features to the guessability of traffic signs were examined. Based on an analysis of the relationships between the cognitive features and the guessability score of signs, the contributions of four sign features to the guessability of traffic signs were examined. Moreover, by exploring Chinese users’ differences in guessing performance between Chinese signs and German signs, cultural issues in sign design were identified. The results showed that vehicle ownership and attention to traffic signs exerted a significant influence on guessing performance. As expected, driver’s license training and the number of years in college were dominant factors for guessing performance. With regard to design features, semantic distance and confidence in guessing were two dominant factors for the guessability of signs. We suggest improving the design of signs by including vivid, universal symbols. Thus, we provide several suggestions for designing more user-friendly signs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Liu & Huiying Wen & Dianchen Zhu & Wesley Kumfer, 2019. "Investigation of the Contributory Factors to the Guessability of Traffic Signs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:162-:d:195914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/162/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/1/162/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giorgia Bagagiolo & Lucia Vigoroso & Federica Caffaro & Margherita Micheletti Cremasco & Eugenio Cavallo, 2019. "Conveying Safety Messages on Agricultural Machinery: The Comprehension of Safety Pictorials in a Group of Migrant Farmworkers in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:162-:d:195914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.