IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i7p1555-d159496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Foot Arch Height and Quality of Life in Adults: A Strobe Observational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel López-López

    (Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, 15403 Ferrol, Spain)

  • Juan Manuel Vilar-Fernández

    (Modeling, Optimization and Statistical Inference Research Group, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Gonzalo Barros-García

    (Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, 15403 Ferrol, Spain)

  • Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain)

  • Patricia Palomo-López

    (University Center of Plasencia, Universidad de Extremadura, 10600 Plasencia, Spain)

  • Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo

    (Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cesar Calvo-Lobo

    (Nursing and Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de León, Ponferrada, 24401 León, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Variations in the foot structure related with the high or low arch are identified common lower limb conditions, and it is supposed to be the effect on the quality of life (QoL) associated to foot health in adults. Here we aimed to determine the relationships between relatively high and low feet arches and QoL. Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. Among 138 adults enrolled in the study, 66 had a high arch, 21 had a low arch, and 51 were within the normal range. Changes related to the foot structure were analyzed using Area Calc version 2.6 software, and data obtained using the Foot-Health-Status-Questionnaire (FHSQ), whose domains were compared between foot arch groups by means of the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The results of the FHSQ comparison between the three groups within the sample population did not show any statistically significant difference ( p > 0.05) for any domains of specific foot (pain, function, general health and footwear) and general (general health, physical activity, social function and vigor) health-related QoL. Conclusions: Specific foot and general health-related QoL did not seem to be influenced by the foot arch height between high, normal and low feet arches heights. Nevertheless, further studies with higher sample sizes and matched-paired groups should be carried out.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel López-López & Juan Manuel Vilar-Fernández & Gonzalo Barros-García & Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias & Patricia Palomo-López & Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo & Cesar Calvo-Lobo, 2018. "Foot Arch Height and Quality of Life in Adults: A Strobe Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-7, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1555-:d:159496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1555/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1555/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yinghu Peng & Duo Wai-Chi Wong & Yan Wang & Tony Lin-Wei Chen & Qitao Tan & Zhenxian Chen & Zhongmin Jin & Ming Zhang, 2020. "Immediate Effects of Medially Posted Insoles on Lower Limb Joint Contact Forces in Adult Acquired Flatfoot: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Joel Marouvo & Maria António Castro & Carlos Santos & Filipa Sousa, 2021. "Correlation between Different Methods to Diagnose Foot Posture Condition," J, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Xuanzhen Cen & Datao Xu & Julien S. Baker & Yaodong Gu, 2020. "Association of Arch Stiffness with Plantar Impulse Distribution during Walking, Running, and Gait Termination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Ewa Puszczalowska-Lizis & Karolina Krawczyk & Jaroslaw Omorczyk, 2022. "Effect of Longitudinal and Transverse Foot Arch on the Position of the Hallux and Fifth Toe in Preschool Children in the Light of Regression Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.
    5. Songlin Xiao & Xini Zhang & Liqin Deng & Shen Zhang & Kedong Cui & Weijie Fu, 2020. "Relationships between Foot Morphology and Foot Muscle Strength in Healthy Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Victoria Mazoteras-Pardo & Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo & Marta Losa-Iglesias & Patricia Palomo-López & Daniel López-López & César Calvo-Lobo & Carlos Romero-Morales & Israel Casado-Hernández, 2021. "Degree of Impact of Tailor’s Bunion on Quality of Life: A Case–Control Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Beata Szczepanowska-Wołowiec & Paulina Sztandera & Ireneusz Kotela & Marek Zak, 2021. "Assessment of the Foot’s Longitudinal Arch by Different Indicators and Their Correlation with the Foot Loading Paradigm in School-Aged Children: A Cross Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-11, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1555-:d:159496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.