Author
Listed:
- Wen-Sheng Liu
(Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Zhongxing Branch, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
College of Science and Engineering, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei city 24451, Taiwan)
- Hsiang Lin Chan
(Department of Child Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taoyuan 33043, Taiwan)
- Yen-Ting Lai
(Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu 30041, Taiwan
Department of Nursing, Yuanpei University, Hsinchu 30041, Taiwan)
- Chih-Ching Lin
(School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
Division of Nephrology and Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 10466, Taiwan)
- Szu-Yuan Li
(School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
Division of Nephrology and Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 10466, Taiwan)
- Chih-Kuang Liu
(College of Medicine and Graduate Institute of Business Administration, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 24451, Taiwan)
- Han-Hsing Tsou
(Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.)
- Tsung-Yun Liu
(Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
Institute of Food Safety and Health Risk Assessment, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 10466, Taiwan
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.)
Abstract
Introduction : Perfluoro-octanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluoro-octanoic acid (PFOA) are two toxic perfluorochemicals (PFCs) commonly used as surfactants. PFCs are difficult to be eliminated from the body. We investigated the influence of different dialysis membranes on the concentrations of PFCs in patients under hemodialysis. Method : We enrolled 98 patients. Of these, 58 patients used hydrophobic polysulfone (PS) dialysis membranes, and the other 40 had hydrophilic membranes made by poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) or cellulose triacetate (CTA). Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry coupled was used with isotope dilution to quantify PFOA and PFOS. Results : The predialysis concentrations of PFOA and PFOS in patients with hydrophobic PS dialysis membranes were 0.50 and 15.77 ng/mL, respectively, lower than the concentrations of 0.81 and 22.70 ng/mL, respectively, in those who used hydrophilic membranes (such as CTA or PMMA). Older patients have higher PFOS and poorer body function, with lower Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) scores. The demographic data of the two groups were similar. However, patients with hydrophobic PS dialysis membranes had lower predialysis aspartate transaminase (AST) ( p = 0.036), lower glucose levels ( p = 0.017), and better body function (nonsignificantly higher KPSS scores, p = 0.091) compared with patients who used other membranes. These differences may be associated with the effects of different membranes, because PFOA positively correlated with AST, while PFOS negatively correlated with body function. Conclusions : This is the first study comparing PFC levels in uremic patients with different dialysis membrane. PS membrane may provide better clearance of PFCs and may, therefore, be beneficial for patients.
Suggested Citation
Wen-Sheng Liu & Hsiang Lin Chan & Yen-Ting Lai & Chih-Ching Lin & Szu-Yuan Li & Chih-Kuang Liu & Han-Hsing Tsou & Tsung-Yun Liu, 2018.
"Dialysis Membranes Influence Perfluorochemical Concentrations and Liver Function in Patients on Hemodialysis,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2574-:d:183569
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:11:p:2574-:d:183569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.