IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i4p452-d96572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Altobelli

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy
    Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, .Local Health Unit 4, 64100 Teramo, Italy)

  • Leonardo Rapacchietta

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Paolo Matteo Angeletti

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Luca Barbante

    (Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy)

  • Filippo Valerio Profeta

    (Department of Community Health, Local Health Unit 4, 64100 Teramo, Italy)

  • Roberto Fagnano

    (Local Health Unit 4, 64100 Teramo, Italy)

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequent tumour affecting women all over the world. In low- and middle-income countries, where its incidence is expected to rise further, BC seems set to become a public health emergency. The aim of the present study is to provide a systematic review of current BC screening programmes in WHO European Region to identify possible patterns. Multiple correspondence analysis was performed to evaluate the association among: measures of occurrence; GNI level; type of BC screening programme; organization of public information and awareness campaigns regarding primary prevention of modifiable risk factors; type of BC screening services; year of screening institution; screening coverage and data quality. A key difference between High Income (HI) and Low and Middle Income (LMI) States, emerging from the present data, is that in the former screening programmes are well organized, with approved screening centres, the presence of mobile units to increase coverage, the offer of screening tests free of charge; the fairly high quality of occurrence data based on high-quality sources, and the adoption of accurate methods to estimate incidence and mortality. In conclusion, the governments of LMI countries should allocate sufficient resources to increase screening participation and they should improve the accuracy of incidence and mortality rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Altobelli & Leonardo Rapacchietta & Paolo Matteo Angeletti & Luca Barbante & Filippo Valerio Profeta & Roberto Fagnano, 2017. "Breast Cancer Screening Programmes across the WHO European Region: Differences among Countries Based on National Income Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:452-:d:96572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guthmuller, Sophie & Carrieri, Vincenzo & Wübker, Ansgar, 2023. "Effects of organized screening programs on breast cancer screening, incidence, and mortality in Europe," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Emma Altobelli & Filippo Gianfelice & Paolo Matteo Angeletti & Reimondo Petrocelli, 2022. "Abdominal Aortic Screening Is a Priority for Health in Smoker Males: A Study on Central Italian Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10, January.
    3. Emma Altobelli & Leonardo Rapacchietta & Valerio F. Profeta & Roberto Fagnano, 2018. "Risk Factors for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Population-Based Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Peter Baade, 2017. "Geographical Variation in Breast Cancer Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-3, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:452-:d:96572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.