IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i4p361-d94641.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Promise and the Challenge of Technology-Facilitated Methods for Assessing Behavioral and Cognitive Markers of Risk for Suicide among U.S. Army National Guard Personnel

Author

Listed:
  • Brian R. W. Baucom

    (Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Panayiotis Georgiou

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • Craig J. Bryan

    (Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA
    National Center for Veterans Studies, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Eric L. Garland

    (Department of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Feea Leifker

    (Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Alexis May

    (Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Alexander Wong

    (Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA)

  • Shrikanth S. Narayanan

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

Abstract

Suicide was the 10th leading cause of death for Americans in 2015 and rates have been steadily climbing over the last 25 years. Rates are particularly high amongst U.S. military personnel. Suicide prevention efforts in the military are significantly hampered by the lack of: (1) assessment tools for measuring baseline risk and (2) methods to detect periods of particularly heightened risk. Two specific barriers to assessing suicide risk in military personnel that call for innovation are: (1) the geographic dispersion of military personnel from healthcare settings, particularly amongst components like the Reserves; and (2) professional and social disincentives to acknowledging psychological distress. The primary aim of this paper is to describe recent technological developments that could contribute to risk assessment tools that are not subject to the limitations mentioned above. More specifically, Behavioral Signal Processing can be used to assess behaviors during interaction and conversation that likely indicate increased risk for suicide, and computer-administered, cognitive performance tasks can be used to assess activation of the suicidal mode. These novel methods can be used remotely and do not require direct disclosure or endorsement of psychological distress, solving two challenges to suicide risk assessment in military and other sensitive settings. We present an introduction to these technologies, describe how they can specifically be applied to assessing behavioral and cognitive risk for suicide, and close with recommendations for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian R. W. Baucom & Panayiotis Georgiou & Craig J. Bryan & Eric L. Garland & Feea Leifker & Alexis May & Alexander Wong & Shrikanth S. Narayanan, 2017. "The Promise and the Challenge of Technology-Facilitated Methods for Assessing Behavioral and Cognitive Markers of Risk for Suicide among U.S. Army National Guard Personnel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:361-:d:94641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/4/361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nima Mesgarani & Edward F. Chang, 2012. "Selective cortical representation of attended speaker in multi-talker speech perception," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 233-236, May.
    2. Anders Barstad, 2008. "Explaining Changing Suicide Rates in Norway 1948–2004: The Role of Social Integration," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 47-64, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrés, Antonio R. & Halicioglu, Ferda, 2010. "Determinants of suicides in Denmark: Evidence from time series data," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(2-3), pages 263-269, December.
    2. Chen-Yin Lee & Pao-Huan Chen & Yen-Kuang Lin, 2021. "An Exploratory Study of the Association between Housing Price Trends and Antidepressant Use in Taiwan: A 10-Year Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Toffolutti, Veronica & Suhrcke, Marc, 2019. "Does austerity really kill?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 211-223.
    4. Evan Lau & Siti Nur Zahara Hamzah & Sandra Chia Chia Tan & Biagio Simonetti, 2017. "Suicide and socioeconomic determinants in Canada: beyond morality and philosophy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1843-1858, July.
    5. Lajos Bálint, 2016. "Suicide in the Hungarian Kingdom," Working Papers on Population, Family and Welfare 25, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute.
    6. Botha, Ferdi & Nguyen, Viet H., 2022. "Opposite nonlinear effects of unemployment and sentiment on male and female suicide rates: Evidence from Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Nathaniel J Zuk & Jeremy W Murphy & Richard B Reilly & Edmund C Lalor, 2021. "Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Giorgio Mattei & Barbara Pistoresi, 2019. "Unemployment and suicide in Italy: evidence of a long-run association mitigated by public unemployment spending," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(4), pages 569-577, June.
    9. Okada, Keisuke & Samreth, Sovannroeun, 2013. "A study on the socio-economic determinants of suicide: Evidence from 13 European OECD countries," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 78-85.
    10. Giovanni M. Di Liberto & Adam Attaheri & Giorgia Cantisani & Richard B. Reilly & Áine Ní Choisdealbha & Sinead Rocha & Perrine Brusini & Usha Goswami, 2023. "Emergence of the cortical encoding of phonetic features in the first year of life," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Takuya Isomura & Kiyoshi Kotani & Yasuhiko Jimbo & Karl J. Friston, 2023. "Experimental validation of the free-energy principle with in vitro neural networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Sahar Akram & Bernhard Englitz & Mounya Elhilali & Jonathan Z Simon & Shihab A Shamma, 2014. "Investigating the Neural Correlates of a Streaming Percept in an Informational-Masking Paradigm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Altinanahtar, Alper & Halicioglu, Ferda, 2009. "A dynamic econometric model of suicides in Turkey," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 903-907, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:4:p:361-:d:94641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.