IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i1p57-d87337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disability Weights for Chronic Mercury Intoxication Resulting from Gold Mining Activities: Results from an Online Pairwise Comparisons Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Nadine Steckling

    (Unit Paediatric Environmental Epidemiology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Occupational Health, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich 80336, Germany
    Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT—University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center I, Hall in Tyrol 6060, Austria
    Department of Environment & Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany)

  • Brecht Devleesschauwer

    (Department of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health (WIV-ISP), Rue Juliette Wytsmanstraat 14, Brussels 1050, Belgium)

  • Julia Winkelnkemper

    (Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany)

  • Florian Fischer

    (Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany)

  • Bret Ericson

    (Pure Earth, Formerly Blacksmith Institute, 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 860, New York, NY 10115, USA)

  • Alexander Krämer

    (Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany)

  • Claudia Hornberg

    (Department of Environment & Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstr. 25, Bielefeld 33615, Germany)

  • Richard Fuller

    (Pure Earth, Formerly Blacksmith Institute, 475 Riverside Drive, Suite 860, New York, NY 10115, USA)

  • Dietrich Plass

    (Section Exposure Assessment and Environmental Health Indicators, German Environment Agency, Corrensplatz 1, Berlin 14195, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Stephan Bose-O’Reilly

    (Unit Paediatric Environmental Epidemiology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Occupational Health, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital Munich, Ziemssenstr. 1, Munich 80336, Germany
    Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT—University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Center I, Hall in Tyrol 6060, Austria
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In artisanal small-scale gold mining, mercury is used for gold-extraction, putting miners and nearby residents at risk of chronic metallic mercury vapor intoxication (CMMVI). Burden of disease (BoD) analyses allow the estimation of the public health relevance of CMMVI, but until now there have been no specific CMMVI disability weights (DWs). The objective is to derive DWs for moderate and severe CMMVI. Disease-specific and generic health state descriptions of 18 diseases were used in a pairwise comparison survey. Mercury and BoD experts were invited to participate in an online survey. Data were analyzed using probit regression. Local regression was used to make the DWs comparable to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. Alternative survey (visual analogue scale) and data analyses approaches (linear interpolation) were evaluated in scenario analyses. A total of 105 participants completed the questionnaire. DWs for moderate and severe CMMVI were 0.368 (0.261–0.484) and 0.588 (0.193–0.907), respectively. Scenario analyses resulted in higher mean values. The results are limited by the sample size, group of interviewees, questionnaire extent, and lack of generally accepted health state descriptions. DWs were derived to improve the data basis of mercury-related BoD estimates, providing useful information for policy-making. Integration of the results into the GBD DWs enhances comparability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadine Steckling & Brecht Devleesschauwer & Julia Winkelnkemper & Florian Fischer & Bret Ericson & Alexander Krämer & Claudia Hornberg & Richard Fuller & Dietrich Plass & Stephan Bose-O’Reilly, 2017. "Disability Weights for Chronic Mercury Intoxication Resulting from Gold Mining Activities: Results from an Online Pairwise Comparisons Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:57-:d:87337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/57/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/1/57/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brecht Devleesschauwer & Arie Havelaar & Charline Maertens de Noordhout & Juanita Haagsma & Nicolas Praet & Pierre Dorny & Luc Duchateau & Paul Torgerson & Herman Oyen & Niko Speybroeck, 2014. "DALY calculation in practice: a stepwise approach," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(3), pages 571-574, June.
    2. Brecht Devleesschauwer & Arie Havelaar & Charline Maertens de Noordhout & Juanita Haagsma & Nicolas Praet & Pierre Dorny & Luc Duchateau & Paul Torgerson & Herman Oyen & Niko Speybroeck, 2014. "Calculating disability-adjusted life years to quantify burden of disease," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(3), pages 565-569, June.
    3. J. Leighton Read & Robert J. Quinn & Donald M. Berwick & Harvey V. Fineberg & Milton C. Weinstein, 1984. "Preferences for Health Outcomes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 4(3), pages 315-329, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gasparinnetti, Pedro & Bakker, Leonardo Barcellos & Queiroz, Julia Mello & Vilela, Thais, 2024. "Economic valuation of artisanal small-scale gold mining impacts: A framework for value transfer application," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Leonardo Barcellos de Bakker & Pedro Gasparinetti & Júlia Mello de Queiroz & Ana Claudia Santiago de Vasconcellos, 2021. "Economic Impacts on Human Health Resulting from the Use of Mercury in the Illegal Gold Mining in the Brazilian Amazon: A Methodological Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-26, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuan Deng & Rui Yan & Zi-qiao Li & Xue-wen Tang & Yang Zhou & Hanqing He, 2021. "Economic and disease burden of Japanese encephalitis in Zhejiang Province, 2013–2018," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Han Bleichrodt, 2002. "A new explanation for the difference between time trade‐off utilities and standard gamble utilities," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(5), pages 447-456, July.
    3. Alan Shiell & Lisa Gold, 2003. "If the price is right: vagueness and values clarification in contingent valuation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(11), pages 909-919, November.
    4. Myriam Tobollik & Matthias Hintzsche & Jördis Wothge & Thomas Myck & Dietrich Plass, 2019. "Burden of Disease Due to Traffic Noise in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Ubel, Peter A. & Loewenstein, George & Scanlon, Dennis & Kamlet, Mark, 1998. "Value measurement in cost-utility analysis: explaining the discrepancy between rating scale and person trade-off elicitations," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 33-44, January.
    6. Paul Dolan & Claire Gudex & Paul Kind & Alan Williams, 1996. "The time trade‐off method: Results from a general population study," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 141-154, March.
    7. Holger J. Schünemann & Lauren Griffith & David Stubbing & Roger Goldstein & Gordon H. Guyatt, 2003. "A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Measurement Properties of 2 Direct Preference Instruments Administered with and without Hypothetical Marker States," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(2), pages 140-149, March.
    8. Ascioti, Fortunato A. & Mangano, Maria Cristina & Marcianò, Claudio & Sarà, Gianluca, 2022. "The sanitation service of seagrasses – Dependencies and implications for the estimation of avoided costs," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    9. Stephanie Bogdewic & Rohit Ramaswamy & David M Goodman & Emmanuel K Srofenyoh & Sebnem Ucer & Medge D Owen, 2020. "The cost-effectiveness of a program to reduce intrapartum and neonatal mortality in a referral hospital in Ghana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    10. Arthur E. Attema & Han Bleichrodt & Olivier l’Haridon & Stefan A. Lipman, 2020. "A comparison of individual and collective decision making for standard gamble and time trade-off," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(3), pages 465-473, April.
    11. Dolan, P. & Gudex, C. & Kind, P. & Williams, A., 1996. "Valuing health states: A comparison of methods," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 209-231, April.
    12. Oliver Damm & Julian Witte & Stefanie Wetzka & Christine Prosser & Sebastian Braun & Robert Welte & Wolfgang Greiner, 2016. "Epidemiology and economic burden of measles, mumps, pertussis, and varicella in Germany: a systematic review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(7), pages 847-860, September.
    13. Joshua A. Salomon & Christopher J.L. Murray, 2004. "A multi‐method approach to measuring health‐state valuations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(3), pages 281-290, March.
    14. Peter J Neumann & Teja Thorat & Yue Zhong & Jordan Anderson & Megan Farquhar & Mark Salem & Eileen Sandberg & Cayla J Saret & Colby Wilkinson & Joshua T Cohen, 2016. "A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, December.
    15. World Health Organization, Foodborne Epidemiology Reference Group, Source Attribution Task Force, 2016. "Research Synthesis Methods in an Age of Globalized Risks: Lessons from the Global Burden of Foodborne Disease Expert Elicitation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 191-202, February.
    16. David Parkin & Nancy Devlin, 2006. "Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost‐utility analysis?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(7), pages 653-664, July.
    17. Raisa B. Deber & Vivek Goel, 1990. "Using Explicit Decision Rules to Manage Issues of Justice, Risk, and Ethics in Decision Analysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(3), pages 181-194, August.
    18. Brecht Devleesschauwer & Arie Havelaar & Charline Maertens de Noordhout & Juanita Haagsma & Nicolas Praet & Pierre Dorny & Luc Duchateau & Paul Torgerson & Herman Oyen & Niko Speybroeck, 2014. "DALY calculation in practice: a stepwise approach," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(3), pages 571-574, June.
    19. Lipman, Stefan A. & Brouwer, Werner B.F. & Attema, Arthur E., 2020. "Living up to expectations: Experimental tests of subjective life expectancy as reference point in time trade-off and standard gamble," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Efrén Murillo-Zamora & Oliver Mendoza-Cano & Mónica Ríos-Silva & Ramón Alberto Sánchez-Piña & Martha Alicia Higareda-Almaraz & Enrique Higareda-Almaraz & Agustin Lugo-Radillo, 2018. "Disability-Adjusted Life Years for Cancer in 2010–2014: A Regional Approach in Mexico," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:1:p:57-:d:87337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.