IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i11p1423-d119730.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards More Nuanced Classification of NGOs and Their Services to Improve Integrated Planning across Disaster Phases

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian L. Towe

    (RAND Corporation, 1200 S. Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA)

  • Joie D. Acosta

    (RAND Corporation, 1200 S. Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA)

  • Anita Chandra

    (RAND Corporation, 1200 S. Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA)

Abstract

Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are being integrated into U.S. strategies to expand the services that are available during health security threats like disasters. Identifying better ways to classify NGOs and their services could optimize disaster planning. We surveyed NGOs about the types of services they provided during different disaster phases. Survey responses were used to categorize NGO services as core —critical to fulfilling their organizational mission—or adaptive —services implemented during a disaster based on community need. We also classified NGOs as being core or adaptive types of organizations by calculating the percentage of each NGO’s services classified as core. Service types classified as core were mainly social services, while adaptive service types were those typically relied upon during disasters (e.g., warehousing, food services, etc.). In total, 120 NGOs were classified as core organizations, meaning they mainly provided the same services across disaster phases, while 100 NGOs were adaptive organizations, meaning their services changed. Adaptive NGOs were eight times more likely to report routinely participating in disaster planning as compared to core NGOs. One reason for this association may be that adaptive NGOs are more aware of the changing needs in their communities across disaster phases because of their involvement in disaster planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian L. Towe & Joie D. Acosta & Anita Chandra, 2017. "Towards More Nuanced Classification of NGOs and Their Services to Improve Integrated Planning across Disaster Phases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-10, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1423-:d:119730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi Lixin & Ge Lingling & Zhao Dong & Zhou Junxue & Gao Zhanwu, 2012. "An analysis on disasters management system in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 295-309, January.
    2. Vakil, Anna C., 1997. "Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 2057-2070, December.
    3. Eric Werker & Faisal Z. Ahmed, 2008. "What Do Nongovernmental Organizations Do?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(2), pages 73-92, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning Zhang & Zaiwu Gong & Kedong Yin & Yuhong Wang, 2018. "Special Issue “Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-8, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gani Aldashev & Marco Marini & Thierry Verdier, 2017. "Samaritan Bundles: Inefficient Clustering in NGO Projects," Working Papers 6/17, Sapienza University of Rome, DISS.
    2. Peter Nunnenkamp & Hannes Öhler, 2012. "Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs : An Empirical Analysis of Non‐charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign Aid," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 81-110, February.
    3. Kate Gooding & James N Newell & Nick Emmel, 2018. "Capacity to conduct health research among NGOs in Malawi: Diverse strengths, needs and opportunities for development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Gani Aldashev & Esteban Jaimovich & Thierry Verdier, 2018. "Small is Beautiful: Motivational Allocation in the Nonprofit Sector," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 730-780.
    5. Roberts, Susan M. & Jones III, John Paul & Frohling, Oliver, 2005. "NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1845-1864, November.
    6. Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Mihai Cristian Orzan & Irinel Marin, 2017. "Toward a Romanian NPOs Sustainability Model: Determinants of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Axel Dreher & Peter Nunnenkamp & Hannes Öhler & Johannes Weisser, 2009. "Acting Autonomously or Mimicking the State and Peers? A Panel Tobit Analysis of Financial Dependence and Aid Allocation by Swiss NGOs," CESifo Working Paper Series 2617, CESifo.
    8. Dolšak Nives, 2017. "Bowling Together: Mobilization of Collective Action by Environmental NGOs," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 25-44, January.
    9. Nunnenkamp, Peter & Öhler, Hannes, 2010. "Donations to US based NGOs in international development cooperation: How (un-)informed are private donors?," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 117, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    10. Verdier, Thierry & Marini, Marco & Aldashev, Gani, 2010. "Brothers in Alms? Coordination between NGOs on Markets for Development Donations," CEPR Discussion Papers 8109, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    11. Fałkowski, Jan & Kurek, Przemysław J., 2024. "Religious symbols in the public sphere and development of the third sector: Some evidence from rural Poland," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 495-508.
    12. Adhikari, Pawan & Upadhaya, Bedanand & Wijethilake, Chaminda & Dhakal Adhikari, Shovita, 2023. "The sociomateriality of digitalisation in Nepalese NGOs," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    13. Faraz Usmani & Marc Jeuland & Subhrendu K. Pattanayak, 2024. "NGOs and the Effectiveness of Interventions," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(6), pages 1690-1708, November.
    14. repec:elg:eechap:15325_15 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Besley, Timothy & Ghatak, Maitreesh, 2017. "Public–private partnerships for the provision of public goods: Theory and an application to NGOs," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 356-371.
    16. Aldashev, Gani & Marini, Marco A. & Verdier, Thierry, 2015. "Governance of Non-Profit and Non-Governmental Organizations - Within- and Between- Organization Analyses: An Introduction," MPRA Paper 80447, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Jan 2015.
    17. Ma, Ji, 2020. "Automated coding using machine-learning and remapping the U.S. nonprofit sector: A guide and benchmark," OSF Preprints pt3q9_v1, Center for Open Science.
    18. Clerkin, Brendan & Quinn, Martin & Connolly, Ciaran, 2024. "Decoupled accounting in a non-profit context: An explanation for stable management accounting?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Duval, Anne-Marie & Gendron, Yves & Roux-Dufort, Christophe, 2015. "Exhibiting nongovernmental organizations: Reifying the performance discourse through framing power," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 31-53.
    20. Chun Li & Huihui Yang & Qiang Yao & Na An & Haixing Meng, 2024. "Governing Urban Climate Resilience (UCR): Systems, Agents, and Institutions in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-21, March.
    21. Banks, Nicola & Hulme, David & Edwards, Michael, 2015. "NGOs, States, and Donors Revisited: Still Too Close for Comfort?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 707-718.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1423-:d:119730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.