IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i10p1180-d114149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negative Peer Relationships on Piracy Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Associations between Cyberbullying Involvement and Digital Piracy

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Yubero

    (Faculty of Education and Humanities, Department of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda de los Alfares, 42, 16071 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Elisa Larrañaga

    (Faculty of Education and Humanities, Department of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda de los Alfares, 42, 16071 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Beatriz Villora

    (Faculty of Education and Humanities, Department of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda de los Alfares, 42, 16071 Cuenca, Spain)

  • Raúl Navarro

    (Faculty of Education and Humanities, Department of Psychology, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda de los Alfares, 42, 16071 Cuenca, Spain)

Abstract

The present study examines the relationship between different roles in cyberbullying behaviors (cyberbullies, cybervictims, cyberbullies-victims, and uninvolved) and self-reported digital piracy. In a region of central Spain, 643 (49.3% females, 50.7% males) students (grades 7–10) completed a number of self-reported measures, including cyberbullying victimization and perpetration, self-reported digital piracy, ethical considerations of digital piracy, time spent on the Internet, and leisure activities related with digital content. The results of a series of hierarchical multiple regression models for the whole sample indicate that cyberbullies and cyberbullies-victims are associated with more reports of digital piracy. Subsequent hierarchical multiple regression analyses, done separately for males and females, indicate that the relationship between cyberbullying and self-reported digital piracy is sustained only for males. The ANCOVA analysis show that, after controlling for gender, self-reported digital piracy and time spent on the Internet, cyberbullies and cyberbullies-victims believe that digital piracy is a more ethically and morally acceptable behavior than victims and uninvolved adolescents believe. The results provide insight into the association between two deviant behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Yubero & Elisa Larrañaga & Beatriz Villora & Raúl Navarro, 2017. "Negative Peer Relationships on Piracy Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Associations between Cyberbullying Involvement and Digital Piracy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-12, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1180-:d:114149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Cronan & Sulaiman Al-Rafee, 2008. "Factors that Influence the Intention to Pirate Software and Media," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 527-545, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica Ortega-Barón & Sofía Buelga & Ester Ayllón & Belén Martínez-Ferrer & María-Jesús Cava, 2019. "Effects of Intervention Program Prev@cib on Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Connie Bateman & Sean Valentine & Terri Rittenburg, 2013. "Ethical Decision Making in a Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Situation: The Role of Moral Absolutes and Social Consensus," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 229-240, June.
    2. Casola, Luca & Kemp, Simon & Mackenzie, Alexander, 2009. "Consumer decisions in the black market for stolen or counterfeit goods," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 162-171, April.
    3. Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Huang, Wei-Jeh & Fang, Chih-Chiang, 2018. "Coordination for distribution of motion pictures in the context of piracy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 209-225.
    4. Casidy, Riza & Phau, Ian & Lwin, Michael, 2016. "The role of religious leaders on digital piracy attitude and intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 244-252.
    5. Mauricio S. Featherman & Nick Hajli, 2016. "Self-Service Technologies and e-Services Risks in Social Commerce Era," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 251-269, December.
    6. Liza Rybina, 2011. "Music Piracy in Transitional Post-Soviet Economies: Ethics, Legislation, and Expertise," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 1(1), pages 3-17, June.
    7. Barbara Culiberg & Domen Bajde, 2014. "Do You Need a Receipt? Exploring Consumer Participation in Consumption Tax Evasion as an Ethical Dilemma," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(2), pages 271-282, October.
    8. Izzatul Jannah & Muamar Nur Kholid, 2020. "Ethics theory and theory of reasoned action in e-book piracy: An empirical study of accounting students," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(3), pages 114-122, April.
    9. Mosleh Zeebaree & Mary Agoyi & Musbah Aqel, 2022. "Sustainable Adoption of E-Government from the UTAUT Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Rúben Meireles & Pedro Campos, 2016. "Digital Piracy: Factors That Influence The Intention To Pirate – A Structural Equation Model Approach," FEP Working Papers 573, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    11. Wang, Yi-Shun & Yeh, Ching-Hsuan & Liao, Yi-Wen, 2013. "What drives purchase intention in the context of online content services? The moderating role of ethical self-efficacy for online piracy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 199-208.
    12. Timothy Paul Cronan & Jeffrey K. Mullins & David E. Douglas, 2018. "Further Understanding Factors that Explain Freshman Business Students’ Academic Integrity Intention and Behavior: Plagiarism and Sharing Homework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 197-220, January.
    13. Simon, Françoise, 2016. "Consumer adoption of No Junk Mail stickers: An extended planned behavior model assessing the respective role of store flyer attachment and perceived intrusiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 12-21.
    14. Ku-Yuan Lee & Li-Chi Lan & Jiun-Hao Wang & Chen-Ling Fang & Kun-Sun Shiao, 2014. "How to Reduce the Latent Social Risk of Disease: The Determinants of Vaccination against Rabies in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Godwin Udo & Kallol Bagchi & Moutusy Maity, 2016. "Exploring Factors Affecting Digital Piracy Using the Norm Activation and UTAUT Models: The Role of National Culture," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 517-541, May.
    16. Kirsten Robertson & Lisa McNeill & James Green & Claire Roberts, 2012. "Illegal Downloading, Ethical Concern, and Illegal Behavior," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(2), pages 215-227, June.
    17. Chia-chen Wang & Chin-ta Chen & Shu-chen Yang & Cheng-kiang Farn, 2009. "Pirate or Buy? The Moderating Effect of Idolatry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(1), pages 81-93, November.
    18. Hassan Aleassa & John Pearson & Scott McClurg, 2011. "Investigating Software Piracy in Jordan: An Extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(4), pages 663-676, February.
    19. Ciprian-Marcel Pop & Andreea–Ioana Romonti-Maniu & Monica-Maria Zaharie, 2017. "Opportunistic Consumer Behaviour in the Context of Digital Piracy," MIC 2017: Managing the Global Economy; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Monastier di Treviso, Italy, 24–27 May 2017,, University of Primorska Press.
    20. Amanda Chu & Patrick Chau & Mike So, 2015. "Explaining the Misuse of Information Systems Resources in the Workplace: A Dual-Process Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 209-225, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1180-:d:114149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.