IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i10p1148-d113573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and Validating an Educational Resource Package for Health Professionals to Improve Smoking Cessation Care in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Pregnant Women

Author

Listed:
  • Yael Bar-Zeev

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia)

  • Michelle Bovill

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia)

  • Billie Bonevski

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia)

  • Maree Gruppetta

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia)

  • Jennifer Reath

    (Department of General Practice, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia)

  • The ICAN QUIT in Pregnancy Pilot Group

    (The ICAN QUIT in Pregnancy Pilot Group)

  • Gillian S. Gould

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia)

Abstract

Australian Aboriginal pregnant women have a high smoking prevalence (45%). Health professionals lack adequate educational resources to manage smoking. Resources need to be tailored to ensure saliency, cultural-sensitivity and account for diversity of Indigenous populations. As part of an intervention to improve health professionals’ smoking cessation care in Aboriginal pregnant women, a resource package was developed collaboratively with two Aboriginal Medical Services. The purpose of this study was to assess and validate this resource package. A multi-centred community-based participatory 4-step process (with three Aboriginal Medical Services from three Australian states), included: (1) Scientific review by an expert panel (2) ‘Suitability of Materials’ scoring by two Aboriginal Health Workers (3) Readability scores (4) Focus groups with health professionals. Content was analysed using six pre-determined themes (attraction, comprehension, self-efficacy, graphics and layout, cultural acceptability, and persuasion), with further inductive analysis for emerging themes. Suitability of Material scoring was adequate or superior. Average readability was grade 6.4 for patient resources (range 5.1–7.2), and 9.8 for health provider resources (range 8.5–10.6). Emergent themes included ‘Getting the message right’; ‘Engaging with family’; ‘Needing visual aids’; and ‘Requiring practicality under a tight timeframe’. Results were presented back to a Stakeholder and Consumer Aboriginal Advisory Panel and resources were adjusted accordingly. This process ensured materials used for the intervention were culturally responsive, evidence-based and useful. This novel formative evaluation protocol could be adapted for other Indigenous and culturally diverse interventions. The added value of this time-consuming and costly process is yet to be justified in research, and might impact the potential adaption by other projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yael Bar-Zeev & Michelle Bovill & Billie Bonevski & Maree Gruppetta & Jennifer Reath & The ICAN QUIT in Pregnancy Pilot Group & Gillian S. Gould, 2017. "Assessing and Validating an Educational Resource Package for Health Professionals to Improve Smoking Cessation Care in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Pregnant Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1148-:d:113573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1148/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1148/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gillian S. Gould & Alys Havard & Ling Li Lim & The PSANZ Smoking in Pregnancy Expert Group & Ratika Kumar, 2020. "Exposure to Tobacco, Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Nicotine in Pregnancy: A Pragmatic Overview of Reviews of Maternal and Child Outcomes, Effectiveness of Interventions and Barriers and Facilitators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Fizzah B. Abidi & Libby Laing & Sue Cooper & Tim Coleman & Katarzyna A. Campbell, 2020. "Experts’ Views on Behaviour Change Techniques for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
    3. María Morales-Suárez-Varela & Isabel Peraita-Costa & Alfredo Perales-Marín & Agustín Llopis-Morales & Agustín Llopis-González, 2022. "Risk of Gestational Diabetes Due to Maternal and Partner Smoking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1148-:d:113573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.