IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i6p546-d71126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of the Literature on Determinants of Chemical Hazard Information Recall among Workers and Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Farzana Sathar

    (Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health Research (CEOHR) and Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie

    (Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health Research (CEOHR) and Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

  • Hanna-Andrea Rother

    (Centre for Environmental and Occupational Health Research (CEOHR) and Division of Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7925, South Africa)

Abstract

In many low and middle income countries (LMIC), workers’ and consumers’ only access to risk and hazard information in relation to the chemicals they use or work with is on the chemical label and safety data sheet. Recall of chemical hazard information is vital in order for label warnings and precautionary information to promote effective safety behaviors. A literature review, therefore, was conducted on determinants of chemical hazard information recall among workers and consumers globally. Since comprehension and recall are closely linked, the determinants of both were reviewed. Literature was reviewed from both online and print peer reviewed journals for all study designs and countries. This review indicated that the level of education, previous training and the inclusion of pictograms on the hazard communication material are all factors that contribute to the recall of hazard information. The influence of gender and age on recall is incongruent and remains to be explored. More research is required on the demographic predictors of the recall of hazard information, the effect of design and non-design factors on recall, the effect of training on the recall among low literate populations and the examining of different regions or contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Farzana Sathar & Mohamed Aqiel Dalvie & Hanna-Andrea Rother, 2016. "Review of the Literature on Determinants of Chemical Hazard Information Recall among Workers and Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:6:p:546-:d:71126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/6/546/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/6/546/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tatiana Andreeva & Konstantin Krasovsky, 2011. "Recall of tobacco pack health warnings by the population in Ukraine and its association with the perceived tobacco health hazard," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(3), pages 253-262, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minjung Lee & Myoungsoon You, 2020. "Safety Behaviors to Reduce Risk of Using Chemical Household Products: An Application of the Risk Perception Attitude Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Biplab Kumar Datta & Muhammad Jami Husain & Ishtiaque Fazlul, 2020. "Tobacco control and household tobacco consumption: A tale of two educational groups," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(10), pages 1117-1131, October.
    2. Gulnoza Usmanova & Ali Mokdad, 2013. "Results of the Global Youth Tobacco Survey and implementation of WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in former Soviet Union countries," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(2), pages 217-226, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:6:p:546-:d:71126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.