IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i1p96-d61577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removal of Fecal Indicators, Pathogenic Bacteria, Adenovirus, Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in Waste Stabilization Ponds in Northern and Eastern Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Maxim Sheludchenko

    (Smart Water Research Centre, Building G51, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia
    Genecology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4558, Australia)

  • Anna Padovan

    (Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory 0909, Australia)

  • Mohammad Katouli

    (Genecology Research Centre, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland 4558, Australia)

  • Helen Stratton

    (Smart Water Research Centre, Building G51, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland 4222, Australia)

Abstract

Maturation ponds are used in rural and regional areas in Australia to remove the microbial loads of sewage wastewater, however, they have not been studied intensively until present. Using a combination of culture-based methods and quantitative real-time PCR, we assessed microbial removal rates in maturation ponds at four waste stabilization ponds (WSP) with ( n = 1) and without ( n = 3) baffles in rural and remote communities in Australia. Concentrations of total coliforms, E. coli , enterococci, Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., F+ RNA coliphage, adenovirus, Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia (oo) cysts in maturation ponds were measured at the inlet and outlet. Only the baffled pond demonstrated a significant removal of most of the pathogens tested and therefore was subjected to further study by analyzing E. coli and enterococci concentrations at six points along the baffles over five sampling rounds. Using culture-based methods, we found a decrease in the number of E. coli and enterococci from the initial values of 100,000 CFU per 100 mL in the inlet samples to approximately 1000 CFU per 100 mL in the outlet samples for both bacterial groups. Giardia cysts removal was relatively higher than fecal indicators reduction possibly due to sedimentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxim Sheludchenko & Anna Padovan & Mohammad Katouli & Helen Stratton, 2016. "Removal of Fecal Indicators, Pathogenic Bacteria, Adenovirus, Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in Waste Stabilization Ponds in Northern and Eastern Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:96-:d:61577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/96/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/1/96/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandra Bastaraud & Philippe Cecchi & Pascal Handschumacher & Mathias Altmann & Ronan Jambou, 2020. "Urbanization and Waterborne Pathogen Emergence in Low-Income Countries: Where and How to Conduct Surveys?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Shervin Hashemi & Mooyoung Han & Eun Namkung, 2018. "Fate of Fecal Indicators in Resource-Oriented Sanitation Systems Using Nitrifying Bio-Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-7, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:1:p:96-:d:61577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.