IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i11p1166-d83462.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Meurk

    (Policy and Epidemiology Group, Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Locked Bag 500, Archerfield, QLD 4018, Australia
    School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Pauline Ford

    (School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Ratika Sharma

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Lisa Fitzgerald

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Coral Gartner

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
    UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

Abstract

Aims and Background : People living with mental disorders experience a disproportionately higher burden of tobacco-related disease than the general population. Long-term substitution with less harmful nicotine products could reduce the tobacco-related harm among this population. This study investigated the views and preferences of people with mental health disorders about different nicotine products and their use as long-term substitutes for cigarettes. Methods : Semi-structured focus group discussion followed by a brief questionnaire. The discussion transcripts were analysed for content and themes and quantitative data summarised with descriptive statistics. Results : Twenty-nine participants took part in four focus groups. Vaping devices were the most acceptable nicotine products discussed; however preferences for nicotine products were individual and varied along aesthetic, pragmatic, sensory and symbolic dimensions. The concept of tobacco harm reduction was unfamiliar to participants, however they generally agreed with the logic of replacing cigarettes with less harmful nicotine products. Barriers to activating tobacco harm reduction included the symbolism of smoking and quitting; the importance placed on health; the consumer appeal of alternatives; and cost implications. Discussion and Conclusions : Engaging this population in tobacco harm reduction options will require communication that challenges black and white thinking (a conceptual framework in which smoking cigarettes or quitting all nicotine are the only legitimate options) as in practice this serves to support the continuance of smoking. Consumers should be encouraged to trial a range of nicotine products to find the most acceptable alternative to smoking that reduces health harms. Providing incentives to switch to nicotine products could help overcome barriers to using less harmful nicotine products among mental health consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Meurk & Pauline Ford & Ratika Sharma & Lisa Fitzgerald & Coral Gartner, 2016. "Views and Preferences for Nicotine Products as an Alternative to Smoking: A Focus Group Study of People Living with Mental Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1166-:d:83462
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pasquale Caponnetto & Roberta Auditore & Cristina Russo & Giorgio Carlo Cappello & Riccardo Polosa, 2013. "Impact of an Electronic Cigarette on Smoking Reduction and Cessation in Schizophrenic Smokers: A Prospective 12-Month Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Kylie Morphett & Brad Partridge & Coral Gartner & Adrian Carter & Wayne Hall, 2015. "Why Don’t Smokers Want Help to Quit? A Qualitative Study of Smokers’ Attitudes towards Assisted vs. Unassisted Quitting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ratika Sharma & Britta Wigginton & Carla Meurk & Pauline Ford & Coral E. Gartner, 2016. "Motivations and Limitations Associated with Vaping among People with Mental Illness: A Qualitative Analysis of Reddit Discussions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claire Adams Spears & Dina M. Jones & Scott R. Weaver & Terry F. Pechacek & Michael P. Eriksen, 2016. "Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems among Adults with Mental Health Conditions, 2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Shirley A. James & Ellen M. Meier & Theodore L. Wagener & Katherine M. Smith & Barbara R. Neas & Laura A. Beebe, 2016. "E-Cigarettes for Immediate Smoking Substitution in Women Diagnosed with Cervical Dysplasia and Associated Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Karolien Adriaens & Dinska Van Gucht & Paul Declerck & Frank Baeyens, 2014. "Effectiveness of the Electronic Cigarette: An Eight-Week Flemish Study with Six-Month Follow-up on Smoking Reduction, Craving and Experienced Benefits and Complaints," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-29, October.
    4. Ross Thomson & Lisa McDaid & Joanne Emery & Felix Naughton & Sue Cooper & Jane Dyas & Tim Coleman, 2019. "Knowledge and Education as Barriers and Facilitators to Nicotine Replacement Therapy Use for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study with Health Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-13, May.
    5. Ratika Sharma & Britta Wigginton & Carla Meurk & Pauline Ford & Coral E. Gartner, 2016. "Motivations and Limitations Associated with Vaping among People with Mental Illness: A Qualitative Analysis of Reddit Discussions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Riccardo Polosa & Jaymin B. Morjaria & Pasquale Caponnetto & Eliana Battaglia & Cristina Russo & Claudio Ciampi & George Adams & Cosimo M. Bruno, 2016. "Blood Pressure Control in Smokers with Arterial Hypertension Who Switched to Electronic Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Riccardo Polosa & Pasquale Caponnetto & Fabio Cibella & Jacques Le-Houezec, 2015. "Quit and Smoking Reduction Rates in Vape Shop Consumers: A Prospective 12-Month Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1166-:d:83462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.