IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i5p5284-5303d49698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Negative Affect Hypothesis of Noise Sensitivity

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Shepherd

    (School of Public Health, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 0627, New Zealand)

  • Marja Heinonen-Guzejev

    (Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, PO Box 41, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland)

  • Kauko Heikkilä

    (Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, PO Box 41, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland)

  • Kim N. Dirks

    (School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

  • Michael J. Hautus

    (School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

  • David Welch

    (School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand)

  • David McBride

    (School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

Abstract

Some studies indicate that noise sensitivity is explained by negative affect, a dispositional tendency to negatively evaluate situations and the self. Individuals high in such traits may report a greater sensitivity to other sensory stimuli, such as smell, bright light and pain. However, research investigating the relationship between noise sensitivity and sensitivity to stimuli associated with other sensory modalities has not always supported the notion of a common underlying trait, such as negative affect, driving them. Additionally, other explanations of noise sensitivity based on cognitive processes have existed in the clinical literature for over 50 years. Here, we report on secondary analyses of pre-existing laboratory ( n = 74) and epidemiological ( n = 1005) data focusing on the relationship between noise sensitivity to and annoyance with a variety of olfactory-related stimuli. In the first study a correlational design examined the relationships between noise sensitivity, noise annoyance, and perceptual ratings of 16 odors. The second study sought differences between mean noise and air pollution annoyance scores across noise sensitivity categories. Results from both analyses failed to support the notion that, by itself, negative affectivity explains sensitivity to noise.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Shepherd & Marja Heinonen-Guzejev & Kauko Heikkilä & Kim N. Dirks & Michael J. Hautus & David Welch & David McBride, 2015. "The Negative Affect Hypothesis of Noise Sensitivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:5:p:5284-5303:d:49698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/5/5284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/5/5284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Shepherd & David Welch & Kim N. Dirks & David McBride, 2013. "Do Quiet Areas Afford Greater Health-Related Quality of Life than Noisy Areas?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Steven Nordin & Gregory Neely & David Olsson & Monica Sandström, 2014. "Odor and Noise Intolerance in Persons with Self-Reported Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalie Riedel & Irene Van Kamp & Heike Köckler & Joachim Scheiner & Adrian Loerbroks & Thomas Claßen & Gabriele Bolte, 2017. "Cognitive-Motivational Determinants of Residents’ Civic Engagement and Health (Inequities) in the Context of Noise Action Planning: A Conceptual Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angel M. Dzhambov & Iana Markevych & Boris Tilov & Zlatoslav Arabadzhiev & Drozdstoj Stoyanov & Penka Gatseva & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2018. "Lower Noise Annoyance Associated with GIS-Derived Greenspace: Pathways through Perceived Greenspace and Residential Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Shan Shu & Hui Ma, 2019. "Restorative Effects of Classroom Soundscapes on Children’s Cognitive Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Liran Shmuel Raz-Steinkrycer & Jonathan Dubnov & Stelian Gelberg & Peng Jia & Boris A. Portnov, 2022. "ELF-MF Exposure, Actual and Perceived, and Associated Health Symptoms: A Case Study of an Office Building in Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Trudeau, Christopher & King, Nicholas & Guastavino, Catherine, 2023. "Investigating sonic injustice: A review of published research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    5. Karin Trimmel & Julia Schätzer & Michael Trimmel, 2014. "Acoustic Noise Alters Selective Attention Processes as Indicated by Direct Current (DC) Brain Potential Changes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Daniel Shepherd & Kim Dirks & David Welch & David McBride & Jason Landon, 2016. "The Covariance between Air Pollution Annoyance and Noise Annoyance, and Its Relationship with Health-Related Quality of Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Sebastian Bernat & Karolina Trykacz & Jakub Skibiński, 2022. "Landscape Perception and the Importance of Recreation Areas for Students during the Pandemic Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Yijun Zeng & Brian Deal & Susan Ask & Tianchen Huang, 2024. "The Landscape of Tranquility in Sweden: Lessons for Urban Design from Crowdsourced Data and Deep Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Gunnar Cerwén & Frans Mossberg, 2019. "Implementation of Quiet Areas in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Patrycja Adamczyk & Martyna Andrzejewska & Sebastian Bernat, 2024. "Spatial Analyses in the Planning of Quiet Areas: A Case Study of Radom and Lublin (Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Shilun Zhang & Xiaolong Zhao & Zixi Zeng & Xuan Qiu, 2019. "The Influence of Audio-Visual Interactions on Psychological Responses of Young People in Urban Green Areas: A Case Study in Two Parks in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Francisco Guijarro, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Road Traffic Externalities on Residential Price Values: A Case Study in Madrid, Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Robert Thorne & Daniel Shepherd, 2013. "Quiet as an Environmental Value: A Contrast between Two Legislative Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Mercede Erfanian & Andrew J. Mitchell & Jian Kang & Francesco Aletta, 2019. "The Psychophysiological Implications of Soundscape: A Systematic Review of Empirical Literature and a Research Agenda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Nicola Mucci & Veronica Traversini & Chiara Lorini & Simone De Sio & Raymond P. Galea & Guglielmo Bonaccorsi & Giulio Arcangeli, 2020. "Urban Noise and Psychological Distress: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Francesco Aletta & Tin Oberman & Jian Kang, 2018. "Associations between Positive Health-Related Effects and Soundscapes Perceptual Constructs: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:5:p:5284-5303:d:49698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.