IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i3p2580-2607d33574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Recommender Systems: Concepts, Requirements, Technical Basics and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Wiesner

    (Department of Medical Informatics, Heilbronn University, Max-Planck-Str. 39, Heilbronn 74081, Germany)

  • Daniel Pfeifer

    (Department of Medical Informatics, Heilbronn University, Max-Planck-Str. 39, Heilbronn 74081, Germany)

Abstract

During the last decades huge amounts of data have been collected in clinical databases representing patients’ health states (e.g., as laboratory results, treatment plans, medical reports). Hence, digital information available for patient-oriented decision making has increased drastically but is often scattered across different sites. As as solution, personal health record systems (PHRS) are meant to centralize an individual’s health data and to allow access for the owner as well as for authorized health professionals. Yet, expert-oriented language, complex interrelations of medical facts and information overload in general pose major obstacles for patients to understand their own record and to draw adequate conclusions. In this context, recommender systems may supply patients with additional laymen-friendly information helping to better comprehend their health status as represented by their record. However, such systems must be adapted to cope with the specific requirements in the health domain in order to deliver highly relevant information for patients. They are referred to as health recommender systems (HRS). In this article we give an introduction to health recommender systems and explain why they are a useful enhancement to PHR solutions. Basic concepts and scenarios are discussed and a first implementation is presented. In addition, we outline an evaluation approach for such a system, which is supported by medical experts. The construction of a test collection for case-related recommendations is described. Finally, challenges and open issues are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Wiesner & Daniel Pfeifer, 2014. "Health Recommender Systems: Concepts, Requirements, Technical Basics and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:3:p:2580-2607:d:33574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/3/2580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/3/2580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Swan, 2009. "Emerging Patient-Driven Health Care Models: An Examination of Health Social Networks, Consumer Personalized Medicine and Quantified Self-Tracking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-34, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei Lu & Yunkai Zhai, 2022. "Self-Adaptive Telemedicine Specialist Recommendation Considering Specialist Activity and Patient Feedback," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Yao Cai & Fei Yu & Manish Kumar & Roderick Gladney & Javed Mostafa, 2022. "Health Recommender Systems Development, Usage, and Evaluation from 2010 to 2022: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Vanderlei Carneiro Silva & Bartira Gorgulho & Dirce Maria Marchioni & Sheila Maria Alvim & Luana Giatti & Tânia Aparecida de Araujo & Angelica Castilho Alonso & Itamar de Souza Santos & Paulo Andrade , 2022. "Recommender System Based on Collaborative Filtering for Personalized Dietary Advice: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the ELSA-Brasil Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuan-Jun Su & Chang-Yu Chiang, 2013. "IAServ: An Intelligent Home Care Web Services Platform in a Cloud for Aging-in-Place," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Katharina Pilgrim & Sabine Bohnet-Joschko, 2022. "Donating Health Data to Research: Influential Characteristics of Individuals Engaging in Self-Tracking," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Rubeis, Giovanni, 2023. "Liquid Health. Medicine in the age of surveillance capitalism," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    4. Jingyun Tang & Guang Yu & Xiaoxu Yao, 2020. "A Comparative Study of Online Depression Communities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Carlos de las Heras-Pedrosa & Dolores Rando-Cueto & Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado & Francisco J. Paniagua-Rojano, 2020. "Exploring the Social Media on the Communication Professionals in Public Health. Spanish Official Medical Colleges Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Lane Peterson Fronczek & Martin Mende & Maura L. Scott & Gergana Y. Nenkov & Anders Gustafsson, 2023. "Friend or foe? Can anthropomorphizing self-tracking devices backfire on marketers and consumers?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1075-1097, September.
    7. Paul Dulaud & Ines Di Loreto & Denis Mottet, 2020. "Self-Quantification Systems to Support Physical Activity: From Theory to Implementation Principles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Lane Peterson Fronczek & Martin Mende & Maura L. Scott, 2022. "From self‐quantification to self‐objectification? Framework and research agenda on consequences for well‐being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1356-1374, September.
    9. Yingjie Lu & Xinwei Wang & Lin Su & Han Zhao, 2023. "Multiplex Social Network Analysis to Understand the Social Engagement of Patients in Online Health Communities," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Bart Verhees & Kees Van Kuijk & Lianne Simonse, 2017. "Care Model Design for E-Health: Integration of Point-of-Care Testing at Dutch General Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Yumei Li & Xiangbin Yan, 2020. "How Could Peers in Online Health Community Help Improve Health Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Erzsébet Forczek & Péter Makra & Cecilia Sik Lanyi & Ferenc Bari, 2015. "The Internet as a New Tool in the Rehabilitation Process of Patients—Education in Focus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Tobias Mettler & Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Health promotion with physiolytics: What is driving people to subscribe in a data-driven health plan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:3:p:2580-2607:d:33574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.