IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v11y2014i12p12223-12246d42768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Risk Factors in a Quality Registry: A Basis for More Patient-Centered Diabetes Care in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Sixten Borg

    (Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, SE-223 81 Lund, Sweden
    The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Box 2127, SE-220 02 Lund, Sweden)

  • Bo Palaszewski

    (The National Diabetes Register, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
    Centre of Registers in Region Vastra Gotaland, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Ulf-G Gerdtham

    (Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, SE-223 81 Lund, Sweden
    The Swedish Institute for Health Economics (IHE), Box 2127, SE-220 02 Lund, Sweden
    Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Box 7082, SE-220 07 Lund, Sweden)

  • Ödegaard Fredrik

    (Ivey Business School, Western University, 1255 Western Road, London ON N6G ON1, Canada)

  • Pontus Roos

    (Health Economics Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University, SE-223 81 Lund, Sweden
    Deceased and Previously at Institute of Applied Economics, Malmo, Sweden)

  • Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir

    (The National Diabetes Register, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
    Centre of Registers in Region Vastra Gotaland, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
    Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, SE-413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden)

Abstract

Diabetes is one of the chronic diseases that constitute the greatest disease burden in the world. The Swedish National Diabetes Register is an essential part of the diabetes care system. Currently it mainly records clinical outcomes, but here we describe how it has started to collect patient-reported outcome measures, complementing the standard registry data on clinical outcomes as a basis for evaluating diabetes care. Our aims were to develop a questionnaire to measure patient abilities and judgments of their experience of diabetes care, to describe a Swedish diabetes patient sample in terms of their abilities, judgments, and risk factors, and to characterize groups of patients with a need for improvement. Patient abilities and judgments were estimated using item response theory. Analyzing them together with standard risk factors for diabetes comorbidities showed that the different types of data describe different aspects of a patient’s situation. These aspects occasionally overlap, but not in any particularly useful way. They both provide important information to decision makers, and neither is necessarily more relevant than the other. Both should therefore be considered, to achieve a more complete evaluation of diabetes care and to promote person-centered care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sixten Borg & Bo Palaszewski & Ulf-G Gerdtham & Ödegaard Fredrik & Pontus Roos & Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir, 2014. "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Risk Factors in a Quality Registry: A Basis for More Patient-Centered Diabetes Care in Sweden," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:12:p:12223-12246:d:42768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/12/12223/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/12/12223/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glenngård, Anna H. & Anell, Anders & Beckman, Anders, 2011. "Choice of primary care provider: Results from a population survey in three Swedish counties," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 31-37.
    2. Blomqvist, Ake, 1991. "The doctor as double agent: Information asymmetry, health insurance, and medical care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 411-432.
    3. van der Ark, L. Andries, 2007. "Mokken Scale Analysis in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 20(i11).
    4. Rizopoulos, Dimitris, 2006. "ltm: An R Package for Latent Variable Modeling and Item Response Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 17(i05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pan, Jay & Qin, Xuezheng & Li, Qian & Messina, Joseph P. & Delamater, Paul L., 2015. "Does hospital competition improve health care delivery in China?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 179-199.
    2. Anell, Anders & Dietrichson, Jens & Ellegård, Lina Maria & Kjellsson, Gustav, 2022. "Well-Informed Choices? Effects of Information Interventions in Primary Care on Care Quality," Working Papers 2022:2, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    3. Anlauf, Markus & Wigger, Berthold U., 1999. "Health insurance and consumer welfare : The case of monopolistic drug markets," Discussion Papers 565, Institut fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre und Statistik, Abteilung fuer Volkswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Jannis Angelis & Anna Häger Glenngård & Henrik Jordahl, 2021. "Management practices and the quality of primary care," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 264-271, April.
    5. Martin Gaynor, 1994. "Issues in the Industrial Organization of the Market for Physician Services," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 211-255, March.
    6. Nick Bailey, 2020. "Measuring Poverty Efficiently Using Adaptive Deprivation Scales," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 891-910, June.
    7. Rita Saleh & Angela Bearth & Michael Siegrist, 2019. "“Chemophobia” Today: Consumers’ Knowledge and Perceptions of Chemicals," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2668-2682, December.
    8. W. W. Koczkodaj & T. Kakiashvili & A. Szymańska & J. Montero-Marin & R. Araya & J. Garcia-Campayo & K. Rutkowski & D. Strzałka, 2017. "How to reduce the number of rating scale items without predictability loss?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 581-593, May.
    9. Yang Yixin & Lü Xin & Ma Jian & Qiao Han, 2014. "A Robust Factor Analysis Model for Dichotomous Data," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(5), pages 437-450, October.
    10. Arulmani Thiyagarajan & Tyler G. James & Roy Rillera Marzo, 2022. "Psychometric properties of the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) among Malaysians during COVID-19: a methodological study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    11. Blomqvist, Ake & Leger, Pierre Thomas, 2005. "Information asymmetry, insurance, and the decision to hospitalize," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 775-793, July.
    12. Erik Canton & Ed Westerhout, 1999. "A model for the Dutch pharmaceutical market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 8(5), pages 391-402, August.
    13. Lucy Kok & Caroline Berden & Klarita Sadiraj, 2015. "Costs and benefits of home care for the elderly versus residential care: a comparison using propensity scores," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 16(2), pages 119-131, March.
    14. Marie Allard & Pierre Thomas Léger & Lise Rochaix, 2009. "Provider Competition in a Dynamic Setting," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(2), pages 457-486, June.
    15. Cox, James C. & Sadiraj, Vjollca & Schnier, Kurt E. & Sweeney, John F., 2016. "Incentivizing cost-effective reductions in hospital readmission rates," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 131(PB), pages 24-35.
    16. Ronen Avraham & Leemore S. Dafny & Max M. Schanzenbach, 2009. "The Impact of Tort Reform on Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Premiums," NBER Working Papers 15371, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Dumont, Etienne & Fortin, Bernard & Jacquemet, Nicolas & Shearer, Bruce, 2008. "Physicians' multitasking and incentives: Empirical evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1436-1450, December.
    18. Thomas Rice, 2012. "The Physician as the Patient’s Agent," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 25, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. George A. Chressanthis & Nayla G. Dahan & Kevin J. Fandl, 2015. "The Effects of State Pharmacy Drug Product Selection Laws on Statin Patient Generic-To-Branded Drug Switch-Backs," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 60(1), pages 26-51, May.
    20. Nicholas Benson & Jose Joaquin Lopez, 2024. "Surgeons' response to reimbursement changes for alternative procedures: Evidence from spine fusion in the U.S," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(1), pages 41-55, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:11:y:2014:i:12:p:12223-12246:d:42768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.