IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i2p82-d1588712.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framework of Best Practices to Drive the Digital Transition: Towards a 4.0 Paradigm Based on Evidence from Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Tiago Bastos

    (Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo (DEGEIT), Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Laboratório Associado de Sistemas Inteligentes (LASI), Instituto de Engenharia Eletrónica e Informática de Aveiro (IEETA), Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Cármen Guimarães

    (Escola Superior de Design, Gestão e Tecnologias da Produção de Aveiro-Norte (ESAN), Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Leonor Teixeira

    (Departamento de Economia, Gestão, Engenharia Industrial e Turismo (DEGEIT), Universidade de Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Laboratório Associado de Sistemas Inteligentes (LASI), Instituto de Engenharia Eletrónica e Informática de Aveiro (IEETA), Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

In a technology-driven world, the concepts of digitalization and Industry 4.0 (I4.0) are an ever more present reality for companies. The benefits which these advancements offer, coupled with the market-driven pressure to reduce response times, have placed businesses in a technological “wave”, where it is imperative to adapt to avoid falling behind. While numerous studies focus on technological developments—such as definitions, capabilities, and potential benefits—few provide a systematic approach to best practices and recommendations for accelerating digital transformation while mitigating adverse impacts. In this study, case studies from 10 companies are analyzed to identify and systematize the best practices implemented in their digital transitions. The findings culminate in a best-practice framework for digital transition (DT), highlighting critical aspects such as understanding a company’s current state, acquiring external knowledge, and addressing the importance of cybersecurity and skilled staff. Concerning originality, this work presents an artifact based on manufacturing industry case studies, emphasizing the practical vision concerning DT.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiago Bastos & Cármen Guimarães & Leonor Teixeira, 2025. "Framework of Best Practices to Drive the Digital Transition: Towards a 4.0 Paradigm Based on Evidence from Case Studies," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:82-:d:1588712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/2/82/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/2/82/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abderahman Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Samuel Fosso Wamba & Horst Treiblmaier, 2021. "The potentials of augmented reality in supply chain management: a state-of-the-art review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 819-856, October.
    2. Soni, Gunjan & Kumar, Satish & Mahto, Raj V. & Mangla, Sachin K. & Mittal, M.L. & Lim, Weng Marc, 2022. "A decision-making framework for Industry 4.0 technology implementation: The case of FinTech and sustainable supply chain finance for SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Natércia Durão & Carla Santos Pereira & Carla Lobo & Fernando Moreira, 2024. "Digitalization, Sustainability, and Internationalization Nexus: Insights from Portuguese Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Sidney A. Rothstein, 2024. "Transnational governance of digital transformation: financing innovation in Europe’s periphery," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 227-239, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Tiwari, Sunil, 2024. "Impact of Fintech on natural resources management: How financial impacts shape the association?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Mastrocinque, Ernesto & Ramírez, F. Javier & Honrubia-Escribano, Andrés & Pham, Duc T., 2022. "Industry 4.0 enabling sustainable supply chain development in the renewable energy sector: A multi-criteria intelligent approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Xue, Qinyuan & Zhan, Peng & Jin, Yifei & He, Hui, 2024. "Reputation, commitment, and financial market regulation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    5. Pandey, Dharen Kumar & Hassan, M.Kabir & Kumari, Vineeta & Zaied, Younes Ben & Rai, Varun Kumar, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of FinTech in banking and finance: A bibliometric review," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    6. Awais, Minahil & Afzal, Ayesha & Firdousi, Saba & Hasnaoui, Amir, 2023. "Is fintech the new path to sustainable resource utilisation and economic development?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Yu, Dan & Wang, Shenghu & Yi, Yuting & Ren, Yu, 2024. "The role of fintech, natural resources and trade policy uncertainty towards SDGs in China: New insights from nonlinear approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. , 2022. "Complexities for the Indian Economy of China's Growing Technological Competence," OSF Preprints fk3r7_v1, Center for Open Science.
    9. Afonso Vaz de Oliveira & Carina M. Oliveira Pimentel & Radu Godina & João Carlos de Oliveira Matias & Susana M. Palavra Garrido, 2022. "Improvement of the Logistics Flows in the Receiving Process of a Warehouse," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-23, March.
    10. agarwal, shekhar, 2022. "India’s Rising Technology Economy: Sources and Consequences," OSF Preprints x6yzm, Center for Open Science.
    11. Sara Pourmorshed & Susanne Durst, 2022. "The Usefulness of the Digitalization Integration Framework for Developing Digital Supply Chains in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Hasan, Morshadul & Hoque, Ariful & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Gasbarro, Dominic, 2024. "FinTech and sustainable development: A systematic thematic analysis using human- and machine-generated processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    13. Adamos Daios & Nikolaos Kladovasilakis & Ioannis Kostavelis, 2024. "Mixed Palletizing for Smart Warehouse Environments: Sustainability Review of Existing Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Catherine Marinagi & Panagiotis Reklitis & Panagiotis Trivellas & Damianos Sakas, 2023. "The Impact of Industry 4.0 Technologies on Key Performance Indicators for a Resilient Supply Chain 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-31, March.
    15. repec:ehu:cuader:69660 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Hasan, Mohammad Maruf & Hasan, Md Enamul & Ghosh, Tusher, 2024. "Transforming developing economies by shifting paradigms beyond natural resources. The fintech and social dynamics for sustainable mineral policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Shi, Hongyu & Liu, Yu & Yang, Yaru, 2024. "Enterprise digital transformation and supply chain stability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Ding, Qian & Huang, Jianbai & Chen, Jinyu, 2023. "Does digital finance matter for corporate green investment? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    19. Johannes Hangl & Viktoria Joy Behrens & Simon Krause, 2022. "Barriers, Drivers, and Social Considerations for AI Adoption in Supply Chain Management: A Tertiary Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Natalia Khan & Wei Deng Solvang & Hao Yu, 2024. "Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and Other Industry 4.0 Technologies in Spare Parts Warehousing in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Systematic Literature Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, February.
    21. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & A. Sharma & Nripendra P. Rana & M. Giannakis & P. Goel & Vincent Dutot, 2023. "Evolution of Artificial Intelligence Research in Technological Forecasting and Social Change: Research Topics, Trends, and Future Directions," Post-Print hal-04292607, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:82-:d:1588712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.