IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i1p28-d1563701.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fake News Detection and Classification: A Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Networks, Large Language Models, and Natural Language Processing Models

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis

    (Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of the Peloponnese, 22131 Tripoli, Greece)

  • Nikolaos D. Tselikas

    (Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of the Peloponnese, 22131 Tripoli, Greece)

  • Dimitrios K. Nasiopoulos

    (Department of Agribusiness and Supply Chain Management, School of Applied Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

In an era where fake news detection has become a pressing issue due to its profound impacts on public opinion, democracy, and social trust, accurately identifying and classifying false information is a critical challenge. In this study, the effectiveness is investigated of advanced machine learning models—convolutional neural networks (CNNs), bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), and generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs)—for robust fake news classification. Each model brings unique strengths to the task, from CNNs’ pattern recognition capabilities to BERT and GPTs’ contextual understanding in the embedding space. Our results demonstrate that the fine-tuned GPT-4 Omni models achieve 98.6% accuracy, significantly outperforming traditional models like CNNs, which achieved only 58.6%. Notably, the smaller GPT-4o mini model performed comparably to its larger counterpart, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of smaller models for specialized tasks. These findings emphasize the importance of fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) to optimize the performance for complex tasks such as fake news classifier development, where capturing subtle contextual relationships in text is crucial. However, challenges such as computational costs and suboptimal outcomes in zero-shot classification persist, particularly when distinguishing fake content from legitimate information. By highlighting the practical application of fine-tuned LLMs and exploring the potential of few-shot learning for fake news detection, this research provides valuable insights for news organizations seeking to implement scalable and accurate solutions. Ultimately, this work contributes to fostering transparency and integrity in journalism through innovative AI-driven methods for fake news classification and automated fake news classifier systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos I. Roumeliotis & Nikolaos D. Tselikas & Dimitrios K. Nasiopoulos, 2025. "Fake News Detection and Classification: A Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Networks, Large Language Models, and Natural Language Processing Models," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:28-:d:1563701
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/1/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/1/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleftheria Papageorgiou & Christos Chronis & Iraklis Varlamis & Yassine Himeur, 2024. "A Survey on the Use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Fake News," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Branislav Sančanin & Aleksandra Penjišević & Dušan J. Simjanović & Branislav M. Ranđelović & Nenad O. Vesić & Maja Mladenović, 2024. "A Fuzzy AHP and PCA Approach to the Role of Media in Improving Education and the Labor Market in the 21st Century," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:28-:d:1563701. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.