IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i7p172-d586178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ontology-Driven Personalized Faceted Search for Exploring Knowledge Bases of Capsicum

Author

Listed:
  • Zaenal Akbar

    (Research Center for Informatics, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

  • Hani Febri Mustika

    (Research Center for Informatics, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

  • Dwi Setyo Rini

    (Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

  • Lindung Parningotan Manik

    (Research Center for Informatics, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

  • Ariani Indrawati

    (Research Center for Informatics, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

  • Agusdin Dharma Fefirenta

    (Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

  • Tutie Djarwaningsih

    (Research Center for Biology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jakarta 12710, Indonesia)

Abstract

Capsicum is a genus of flowering plants in the Solanaceae family in which the members are well known to have a high economic value. The Capsicum fruits, which are popularly known as peppers or chili, have been widely used by people worldwide. It serves as a spice and raw material for many products such as sauce, food coloring, and medicine. For many years, scientists have studied this plant to optimize its production. A tremendous amount of knowledge has been obtained and shared, as reflected in multiple knowledge-based systems, databases, or information systems. An approach to knowledge-sharing is through the adoption of a common ontology to eliminate knowledge understanding discrepancy. Unfortunately, most of the knowledge-sharing solutions are intended for scientists who are familiar with the subject. On the other hand, there are groups of potential users that could benefit from such systems but have minimal knowledge of the subject. For these non-expert users, finding relevant information from a less familiar knowledge base would be daunting. More than that, users have various degrees of understanding of the available content in the knowledge base. This understanding discrepancy raises a personalization problem. In this paper, we introduce a solution to overcome this challenge. First, we developed an ontology to facilitate knowledge-sharing about Capsicum to non-expert users. Second, we developed a personalized faceted search algorithm that provides multiple structured ways to explore the knowledge base. The algorithm addresses the personalization problem by identifying the degree of understanding about the subject from each user. In this way, non-expert users could explore a knowledge base of Capsicum efficiently. Our solution characterized users into four groups. As a result, our faceted search algorithm defines four types of matching mechanisms, including three ranking mechanisms as the core of our solution. In order to evaluate the proposed method, we measured the predictability degree of produced list of facets. Our findings indicated that the proposed matching mechanisms could tolerate various query types, and a high degree of predictability can be achieved by combining multiple ranking mechanisms. Furthermore, it demonstrates that our approach has a high potential contribution to biodiversity science in general, where many knowledge-based systems have been developed with limited access to users outside of the domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaenal Akbar & Hani Febri Mustika & Dwi Setyo Rini & Lindung Parningotan Manik & Ariani Indrawati & Agusdin Dharma Fefirenta & Tutie Djarwaningsih, 2021. "An Ontology-Driven Personalized Faceted Search for Exploring Knowledge Bases of Capsicum," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:172-:d:586178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/7/172/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/7/172/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josué Padilla-Cuevas & José A. Reyes-Ortiz & Maricela Bravo, 2021. "Ontology-Based Context Event Representation, Reasoning, and Enhancing in Academic Environments," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Christian König & Patrick Weigelt & Julian Schrader & Amanda Taylor & Jens Kattge & Holger Kreft, 2019. "Biodiversity data integration—the significance of data resolution and domain," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Xiaoliang Meng & Chao Xu & Xinxia Liu & Junming Bai & Wenhan Zheng & Hao Chang & Zhuo Chen, 2018. "An Ontology-Underpinned Emergency Response System for Water Pollution Accidents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Maria Peter & Tim Diekötter & Kerstin Kremer, 2019. "Participant Outcomes of Biodiversity Citizen Science Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Jeff Z. Pan, 2009. "Resource Description Framework," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Steffen Staab & Rudi Studer (ed.), Handbook on Ontologies, pages 71-90, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingjing Guo & Ziyu Jiang & Yan Bu & Jinhua Cheng, 2019. "Supporting Sustainable Development of Water Resources: A Social Welfare Maximization Game Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Wessel Ganzevoort & Riyan J. G. van den Born, 2021. "Counting Bees: Learning Outcomes from Participation in the Dutch National Bee Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Bing Mei & Shuxia Yang, 2019. "Nurturing Environmental Education at the Tertiary Education Level in China: Can Mobile Augmented Reality and Gamification Help?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Anne E Thessen & Paul Bogdan & David J Patterson & Theresa M Casey & César Hinojo-Hinojo & Orlando de Lange & Melissa A Haendel, 2021. "From Reductionism to Reintegration: Solving society’s most pressing problems requires building bridges between data types across the life sciences," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Laura Christ & Marie Hahn & Anne-Kathrin Sieg & Daniel C. Dreesmann, 2022. "Be(e) Engaged! How Students Benefit from an Educational Citizen Science Project on Biodiversity in Their Biology Classes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Anat Goldstein & Lior Fink & Gilad Ravid, 2021. "A Framework for Evaluating Agricultural Ontologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    7. Kwoting Fang & Shuoche Lin, 2019. "An Integrated Approach for Modeling Ontology-Based Task Knowledge on an Incident Command System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Andrea Spasiano & Salvatore Grimaldi & Alessio Maria Braccini & Fernando Nardi, 2021. "Towards a Transdisciplinary Theoretical Framework of Citizen Science: Results from a Meta-Review Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Baptiste Bedessem & Lucie Morère & Louise Roblin & Anne Dozières & Anne-Caroline Prévot, 2022. "Participatory Biodiversity Governance: A Comparison of Two French Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Juan Du & Hengqing Jing & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo & Vijayan Sugumaran & Daniel Castro-Lacouture, 2020. "An Ontology and Multi-Agent Based Decision Support Framework for Prefabricated Component Supply Chain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 1467-1485, December.
    11. Juan Du & Hengqing Jing & Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo & Vijayan Sugumaran & Daniel Castro-Lacouture, 0. "An Ontology and Multi-Agent Based Decision Support Framework for Prefabricated Component Supply Chain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    12. Daniela De Filippo & María Luisa Lascurain & Andres Pandiella-Dominique & Elias Sanz-Casado, 2020. "Scientometric Analysis of Research in Energy Efficiency and Citizen Science through Projects and Publications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Anastasia Adamou & Yiannis Georgiou & Demetra Paraskeva-Hadjichambi & Andreas Ch. Hadjichambis, 2021. "Environmental Citizen Science Initiatives as a Springboard towards the Education for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-29, December.
    14. Nadja Pernat & Anika Kristin Gathof & Johann Herrmann & Birgit Seitz & Sascha Buchholz, 2023. "Citizen Science Apps in a Higher Education Botany Course: Data Quality and Learning Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    15. Brack W. Hale, 2021. "Educating for the Environment: The Role of the Host Destination in Education Travel Programs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Federica Compagnone & Marco Varricchione & Michele Innangi & Mirko Di Febbraro & Anna Loy & Angela Stanisci & Maria Carla de Francesco & Giorgio Matteucci & Maria Laura Carranza, 2023. "Coastal Biodiversity Assessment Aided by Citizen Science Volunteers: A Look at the Italian Central Adriatic," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    17. María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares & Sara Gutiérrez-González & Ángel Rodríguez & Lourdes Alameda Cuenca-Romero & Verónica Calderón & Miguel Ángel Queiruga-Dios, 2020. "Systematic Review on Inclusive Education, Sustainability in Engineering: An Analysis with Mixed Methods and Data Mining Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Jennifer Schneiderhan-Opel & Franz X. Bogner, 2020. "The Relation between Knowledge Acquisition and Environmental Values within the Scope of a Biodiversity Learning Module," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:7:p:172-:d:586178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.