IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i2p44-d497405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Regulation of Intellectual Capital for Open Innovation: Industries’ Expert Assessments of Tacit Knowledge for Controlling and Networking Outcome

Author

Listed:
  • Nadezhda N. Pokrovskaia

    (Department of Public Relations and Advertising of the Institute of Human Philosophy, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 191186 St. Petersburg, Russia
    Higher School of Media Communications and Public Relations of the Institute of Humanities, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia
    Department of Innovation Management, St. Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI”, 197022 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Olga N. Korableva

    (Economic Faculty, St. Petersburg State University, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia
    St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 199178 St. Petersburg, Russia
    Institute of Problems of Regional Research of Russian Academy of Science, 190013 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Lucio Cappelli

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, 03043 Cassino, Italy
    Faculty of Economics, La Sapienza University, 00161 Roma, Italy)

  • Denis A. Fedorov

    (Department of Public Relations and Advertising of the Institute of Human Philosophy, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, 191186 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Digital regulation implies the quantified measuring and the network infrastructure allowing managers to control the processes of value creation. Digital regulation needs to take into account tacit elements of the value creation process, including unconscious competency, creativity, and intuitive anticipation, to assure the resulting network’s innovation growth. Digital society in developing countries is built on the ground of fact change of the economy and social relations, of transition towards an emerging market within the global offline network of interactions and online activities through Internet; the innovative growth imposes the evolution of managerial behavior and attitudes. The main objective of the paper is to obtain indications on the perception of intellectual capital by corporate managers. The exploratory study was carried out in Russian companies operating in different sectors, with the use of the open-ended approach, including focused interviews and group discussion among experts, middle and senior managers from marketing or corporate governance background. The data were complemented by documentary analysis of descriptions of internal processes of the implementation of digital tools of accounting, which includes the human resources control applied for the remote work during the pandemic. Networking helps to coordinate functions between team members at remote work and between teams and administrators. The interviews demonstrated the administrative tendency to under-estimate the non-formalized factors of innovation activity, such as awareness of corporate strategy, creativity, motivation, and affective and behavioral components of communication of the persons involved in the enrichment of intellectual capital. The results show fuzzy boundaries between the intellectual capital components that are difficult to control. This difficulty provokes the preference for the use of “traditional” quantitative indicators that had been implemented at the stage of the financial digitalization, instead of developing new parameters or measuring approaches. The networking emerges synergetic effect if the administrators refuse their monopoly on the uncertainty zones and are oriented to construct the trustful atmosphere of personal responsibility within the network.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadezhda N. Pokrovskaia & Olga N. Korableva & Lucio Cappelli & Denis A. Fedorov, 2021. "Digital Regulation of Intellectual Capital for Open Innovation: Industries’ Expert Assessments of Tacit Knowledge for Controlling and Networking Outcome," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:44-:d:497405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/2/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/2/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nasif Ozkan & Sinan Cakan & Murad Kayacan, 2017. "Intellectual capital and financial performance: A study of the Turkish Banking Sector," Borsa Istanbul Review, Research and Business Development Department, Borsa Istanbul, vol. 17(3), pages 190-198, September.
    2. Meles, Antonio & Porzio, Claudio & Sampagnaro, Gabriele & Verdoliva, Vincenzo, 2016. "The impact of the intellectual capital efficiency on commercial banks performance: Evidence from the US," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 64-74.
    3. Olga D. Shipunova & Larisa V. Mureyko & Irina P. Berezovskaya & Ivan V. Kolomeyzev & Vera A. Serkova, 2017. "Cultural Code in Controlling Stereotypes of Mass Consciousness," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 694-705.
    4. Muhammad Ahmad & Naveed Ahmed, 2016. "Testing the relationship between intellectual capital and a firm's performance: an empirical investigation regarding financial industries of Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2/3), pages 250-272.
    5. Bellini Francesco & Dulskaia Iana & Savastano Marco & D’Ascenzo Fabrizio, 2019. "Business Models Innovation for Sustainable Urban Mobility in Small and Medium-Sized European Cities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(3), pages 266-277, September.
    6. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    7. Tatiana Andreeva & Tatiana Garanina, 2017. "Intellectual Capital and Its Impact on the Financial Performance of Russian Manufacturing Companies," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 31-40.
    8. Muhammad Haris & Yao HongXing & Gulzara Tariq & Ali Malik, 2019. "An evaluation of performance of public sector financial institutions: evidence from Pakistan," International Journal of Business Performance Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 145-163.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongxing Yao & Muhammad Haris & Gulzara Tariq & Hafiz Mustansar Javaid & Muhammad Aamir Shafique Khan, 2019. "Intellectual Capital, Profitability, and Productivity: Evidence from Pakistani Financial Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Muhammad Haris & HongXing Yao & Gulzara Tariq & Ali Malik & Hafiz Mustansar Javaid, 2019. "Intellectual Capital Performance and Profitability of Banks: Evidence from Pakistan," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Jian Xu & Muhammad Haris & Hongxing Yao, 2019. "Should Listed Banks Be Concerned with Intellectual Capital in Emerging Asian Markets? A Comparison between China and Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Dat T. Nguyen & Tu D. Q. Le & Tin H. Ho, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Bank Risk in Vietnam—A Quantile Regression Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Matousek, Roman & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Atta Ullah & Chen Pinglu & Saif Ullah & Ningyu Qian & Mubasher Zaman, 2023. "Impact of intellectual capital efficiency on financial stability in banks: Insights from an emerging economy," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1858-1871, April.
    7. Abdulmuttalip PILATIN & Hasan AYAYDIN & Abdulkadir BARUT, 2023. "Does Intellectual Capital Affect Financial Performance and Non-Performing Loans? Evidence From the Banking Sector in Turkey," Journal of BRSA Banking and Financial Markets, Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency, vol. 17(1), pages 39-64.
    8. Sarah Athirah Saruchi & Nor Aiza Mohd Zamil & Rohaida Basiruddin & Nor Faezah Ghazi Ahmad, 2019. "Examining the Impact of Corporate Governance on Intellectual Capital: Empirical Evidence of Islamic Banks," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(3), pages 104-117, July.
    9. Muhammad Imran Nazir & Yong Tan & Muhammad Rizwan Nazir, 2021. "Intellectual capital performance in the financial sector: Evidence from China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 6089-6109, October.
    10. Vo, Duc, 2018. "Should Bankers Be Concerned with Intellectual Capital? A Study of the Thai Banking Sector," MPRA Paper 103275, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Lujing Liu & Jiyue Zhang & Jian Xu & Yiqun Wang, 2022. "Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance of Chinese Manufacturing SMEs: An Analysis from the Perspective of Different Industry Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Monika Barak & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2024. "Does intellectual capital impact the financial performance of Indian public sector banks? An empirical analysis using GMM," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Adesina, Kolade Sunday, 2019. "Bank technical, allocative and cost efficiencies in Africa: The influence of intellectual capital," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 419-433.
    14. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    15. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    17. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    18. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    19. Chris Kimble & José Braga Vasconcelos & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1119-1130, December.
    20. Maurizio Zollo, 1998. "Strategies or Routines ? Knowledge Codification, Path-Dependence and the Evolution of Post-Acquisition Integration Practices in the U.S. Banking Industry," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-10, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:44-:d:497405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.