IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v11y2019i2p50-d206946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Anh Nguyen-Duc

    (Business School, University of South Eastern Norway, 3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway)

  • Khan Khalid

    (Karachi Institute of Economics and Technology, P.O. Box 75190 Karachi, Pakistan)

  • Sohaib Shahid Bajwa

    (University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Tor Lønnestad

    (Business School, University of South Eastern Norway, 3800 Bø i Telemark, Norway)

Abstract

Internet of Things applications are not only the new opportunity for digital businesses but also a major driving force for the modification and creation of software systems in all industries and businesses. Compared to other types of software-intensive products, the development of Internet of Things applications lacks a systematic approach and guidelines. This paper aims at understanding the common practices and challenges among start-up companies who are developing Internet of Things products. A qualitative research is conducted with data from twelve semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis reveals common types of Minimum Viable Products, prototyping techniques and production concerns among early stage hardware start-ups. We found that hardware start-ups go through an incremental prototyping process toward production. The progress associates with the transition from speed-focus to quality-focus. Hardware start-ups heavily rely on third-party vendors in term of development speed and final product quality. We identified 24 challenges related to management, requirement, design, implementation and testing. Internet of Things entrepreneurs should be aware of relevant pitfalls and managing both internal and external risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Anh Nguyen-Duc & Khan Khalid & Sohaib Shahid Bajwa & Tor Lønnestad, 2019. "Minimum Viable Products for Internet of Things Applications: Common Pitfalls and Practices," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:50-:d:206946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/2/50/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/2/50/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. YangQun Li, 2018. "An Integrated Platform for the Internet of Things Based on an Open Source Ecosystem," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chetna Gupta & Varun Gupta, 2022. "Are These Requirements Risky: A Proposal of an IoT-Based Requirements Risk Estimation Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Zichong Lyu & Dirk Pons & Yilei Zhang & Zuzhen Ji, 2022. "Minimum Viable Model (MVM) Methodology for Integration of Agile Methods into Operational Simulation of Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abderahman Rejeb & John G. Keogh & Horst Treiblmaier, 2019. "Leveraging the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain Management," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Dénes László Fekete & Attila Kiss, 2021. "A Survey of Ledger Technology-Based Databases," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Vasiliy Elagin & Anastasia Spirkina & Andrei Levakov & Ilya Belozertsev, 2020. "Blockchain Behavioral Traffic Model as a Tool to Influence Service IT Security," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Houssein Hellani & Layth Sliman & Abed Ellatif Samhat & Ernesto Exposito, 2021. "On Blockchain Integration with Supply Chain: Overview on Data Transparency," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Sathiya, V. & Nagalakshmi, K. & Jeevamalar, J. & Anand Babu, R. & Karthi, R. & Acevedo-Duque, Ángel & Lavanya, R. & Ramabalan, S., 2023. "Reshaping healthcare supply chain using chain-of-things technology and key lessons experienced from COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:50-:d:206946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.