IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i6p5577-5597d51018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing and Comparing Biomass Feedstock Supply Systems in China: Corn Stover and Sweet Sorghum Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lantian Ren

    (College of Light Industry and Textiles, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, Heilongjiang, China
    Biomass Logistics Department, National Energy R&D Center for Non-food Biomass, Beijing 100193, China
    Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technologies, Idaho National Laboratory, PO Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kara Cafferty

    (Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technologies, Idaho National Laboratory, PO Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210, USA
    Environment and Nuclear Business Group, CH2M Hill Companies Ltd., 1000 NE Circle Blvd Suite 10350, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mohammad Roni

    (Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technologies, Idaho National Laboratory, PO Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jacob Jacobson

    (Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technologies, Idaho National Laboratory, PO Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210, USA)

  • Guanghui Xie

    (Biomass Logistics Department, National Energy R&D Center for Non-food Biomass, Beijing 100193, China
    College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Leslie Ovard

    (Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technologies, Idaho National Laboratory, PO Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210, USA)

  • Christopher Wright

    (Biofuels & Renewable Energy Technologies, Idaho National Laboratory, PO Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-2210, USA)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the rural Chinese biomass supply system and models supply chain operations according to U.S. concepts of logistical unit operations: harvest and collection, storage, transportation, preprocessing, and handling and queuing. In this paper, we quantify the logistics cost of corn stover and sweet sorghum in China under different scenarios. We analyze three scenarios of corn stover logistics from northeast China and three scenarios of sweet sorghum stalks logistics from Inner Mongolia in China. The case study estimates that the logistics cost of corn stover and sweet sorghum stalk to be $52.95/dry metric ton and $52.64/dry metric ton, respectively, for the current labor-based biomass logistics system. However, if the feedstock logistics operation is mechanized, the cost of corn stover and sweet sorghum stalk decreases to $36.01/dry metric ton and $35.76/dry metric ton, respectively. The study also includes a sensitivity analysis to identify the cost factors that cause logistics cost variation. Results of the sensitivity analysis show that labor price has the most influence on the logistics cost of corn stover and sweet sorghum stalk, with a variation of $6 to $12/dry metric ton.

Suggested Citation

  • Lantian Ren & Kara Cafferty & Mohammad Roni & Jacob Jacobson & Guanghui Xie & Leslie Ovard & Christopher Wright, 2015. "Analyzing and Comparing Biomass Feedstock Supply Systems in China: Corn Stover and Sweet Sorghum Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:5577-5597:d:51018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/6/5577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/6/5577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roni, Md.S. & Eksioglu, Sandra D. & Searcy, Erin & Jha, Krishna, 2014. "A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 115-134.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong Jiang & Tian Ma & Fangyu Ding & Jingying Fu & Mengmeng Hao & Qian Wang & Shuai Chen, 2019. "Mapping Global Environmental Suitability for Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Alessandro Sopegno & Efthymios Rodias & Dionysis Bochtis & Patrizia Busato & Remigio Berruto & Valter Boero & Claus Sørensen, 2016. "Model for Energy Analysis of Miscanthus Production and Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Xiaolin Yang & Meng Li & Huihui Liu & Lantian Ren & Guanghui Xie, 2018. "Technical Feasibility and Comprehensive Sustainability Assessment of Sweet Sorghum for Bioethanol Production in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Marco Manzone & Fabrizio Gioelli & Paolo Balsari, 2017. "Kiwi Clear‐Cut: First Evaluation of Recovered Biomass for Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Hernan Chavez & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Erin Webb, 2017. "Development of the IBSAL-SimMOpt Method for the Optimization of Quality in a Corn Stover Supply Chain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Shizhong Song & Pei Liu & Jing Xu & Linwei Ma & Chinhao Chong & Min He & Xianzheng Huang & Zheng Li & Weidou Ni, 2016. "An Economic and Policy Analysis of a District Heating System Using Corn Straw Densified Fuel: A Case Study in Nong’an County in Jilin Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Efthymios Rodias & Remigio Berruto & Dionysis Bochtis & Patrizia Busato & Alessandro Sopegno, 2017. "A Computational Tool for Comparative Energy Cost Analysis of Multiple-Crop Production Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Kaiyan Luo & Xingping Zhang & Qinliang Tan, 2018. "A Co-Opetition Straw Supply Strategy Integrating Rural Official Organizations and Farmers’ Behavior in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    9. Mohammad S. Roni & Sandra D. Eksioglu & Kara G. Cafferty & Jacob J. Jacobson, 2017. "A multi-objective, hub-and-spoke model to design and manage biofuel supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 351-380, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ebers Broughel, Anna, 2019. "Impact of state policies on generating capacity for production of electricity and combined heat and power from forest biomass in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1163-1172.
    2. Hadi Karimi & Sandra D. Ekşioğlu & Michael Carbajales-Dale, 2021. "A biobjective chance constrained optimization model to evaluate the economic and environmental impacts of biopower supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 95-130, January.
    3. Halim, Ronald A. & Kwakkel, Jan H. & Tavasszy, Lóránt A., 2016. "A strategic model of port-hinterland freight distribution networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 368-384.
    4. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    5. Diana Goettsch & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Maria Aranguren, 2020. "Machine-Learning Methods to Select Potential Depot Locations for the Supply Chain of Biomass Co-Firing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Yılmaz Balaman, Şebnem & Wright, Daniel G. & Scott, James & Matopoulos, Aristides, 2018. "Network design and technology management for waste to energy production: An integrated optimization framework under the principles of circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 911-933.
    7. Attari, Mahdi Yousefi Nejad & Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi, 2018. "Developing benders decomposition algorithm for a green supply chain network of mine industry: Case of Iranian mine industry," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 371-382.
    8. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis for biomass supply chain: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Sushil R. Poudel & Md Abdul Quddus & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Linkan Bian & Reuben F. Burch V, 2019. "Managing congestion in a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 739-781, February.
    10. Zeng, Lanyan & Liu, Shi Qiang & Kozan, Erhan & Corry, Paul & Masoud, Mahmoud, 2021. "A comprehensive interdisciplinary review of mine supply chain management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Sydney Oluoch & Pankaj Lal & Andres Susaeta & Meghann Smith & Bernabas Wolde, 2024. "Consumer Preferences for Wood-Pellet-Based Green Pricing Programs in the Eastern United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Poudel, Sushil Raj & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan, 2016. "A hybrid decomposition algorithm for designing a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-25.
    13. Roni, Mohammad S. & Thompson, David N. & Hartley, Damon S., 2019. "Distributed biomass supply chain cost optimization to evaluate multiple feedstocks for a biorefinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    14. Mohamed Abdul Ghani, N. Muhammad Aslaam & Vogiatzis, Chrysafis & Szmerekovsky, Joseph, 2018. "Biomass feedstock supply chain network design with biomass conversion incentives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 39-49.
    15. R. N. Ossei-Bremang & F. Kemausuor, 2021. "A decision support system for the selection of sustainable biomass resources for bioenergy production," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 437-454, September.
    16. Maria F. Aranguren & Krystel K. Castillo-Villar & Mario Aboytes-Ojeda & Marcio H. Giacomoni, 2018. "Simulation-Optimization Approach for the Logistics Network Design of Biomass Co-Firing with Coal at Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    17. Roni, Mohammad S. & Chowdhury, Sudipta & Mamun, Saleh & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Lein, William & Johnson, Samuel, 2017. "Biomass co-firing technology with policies, challenges, and opportunities: A global review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1089-1101.
    18. Sangpil Ko & Pasi Lautala, 2018. "Optimal Level of Woody Biomass Co-Firing with Coal Power Plant Considering Advanced Feedstock Logistics System," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Yiyun Liu & Rui Zhao & Kuo-Jui Wu & Tao Huang & Anthony S. F. Chiu & Chenyi Cai, 2018. "A Hybrid of Multi-Objective Optimization and System Dynamics Simulation for Straw-to-Electricity Supply Chain Management under the Belt and Road Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Ekşioğlu, Sandra Duni, 2017. "Managing congestion in supply chains via dynamic freight routing: An application in the biomass supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 54-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:6:p:5577-5597:d:51018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.