IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v8y2015i12p12399-13863d60111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regionalized Techno-Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis for Biomass Molded Fuel in China

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Xu

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China
    China Renewable Energy Society, Beijing 100190, China)

  • Shiyan Chang

    (Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Zhenhong Yuan

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Yang Jiang

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Shuna Liu

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Weizhen Li

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Longlong Ma

    (Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China)

Abstract

As a relatively mature technology, biomass molded fuel (BMF) is widely used in distributed and centralized heating in China and has received considerable government attention. Although many BFM incentive policies have been developed, decreased domestic traditional fuel prices in China have caused BMF to lose its economic viability and new policy recommendations are needed to stimulate this industry. The present study built a regionalized net present value (NPV) model based on real production process simulation to test the impacts of each policy factor. The calculations showed that BMF production costs vary remarkably between regions, with the cost of agricultural briquette fuel (ABF) ranging from 86 US dollar per metric ton (USD/t) to 110 (USD/t), while that of woody pellet fuel (WPF) varies from 122 USD/t to 154 USD/t. The largest part of BMF’s cost composition is feedstock, which accounts for up 50%–60% of the total; accordingly a feedstock subsidy is the most effective policy factor, but in consideration of policy implementation, it would be better to use a production subsidy. For ABF, the optimal product subsidy varies from 26 USD/t to 57 USD/t among different regions of China, while for WPF, the range is 36 USD/t to 75 USD/t. Based on the data, a regional BMF development strategy is also proposed in this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Xu & Shiyan Chang & Zhenhong Yuan & Yang Jiang & Shuna Liu & Weizhen Li & Longlong Ma, 2015. "Regionalized Techno-Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis for Biomass Molded Fuel in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:12:p:12399-13863:d:60111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/12/12399/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/12/12399/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska & Radosław Grech & Wojciech Szefner, 2020. "The Use of Plant Biomass Pellets for Energy Production by Combustion in Dedicated Furnaces," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Andrzej Greinert & Maria Mrówczyńska & Wojciech Szefner, 2019. "The Use of Waste Biomass from the Wood Industry and Municipal Sources for Energy Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    4. Veronika Chaloupková & Tatiana Ivanova & Petr Hutla & Monika Špunarová, 2021. "Ash Melting Behavior of Rice Straw and Calcium Additives," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Ma, Chenshuo & Zhang, Yifei & Ma, Keni & Li, Chanyun, 2023. "Study on the relationship between service scale and investment cost of energy service stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    6. Sławomir Francik & Adrian Knapczyk & Artur Knapczyk & Renata Francik, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Production of Miscanthus and Willow Briquettes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Christina Moulogianni & Thomas Bournaris, 2017. "Biomass Production from Crops Residues: Ranking of Agro-Energy Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    8. Sahoo, Kamalakanta & Bilek, Edward & Bergman, Richard & Mani, Sudhagar, 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 578-590.
    9. Wenjia Peng & Brian E. Robinson & Hua Zheng & Cong Li & Fengchun Wang & Ruonan Li, 2019. "Telecoupled Sustainable Livelihoods in an Era of Rural–Urban Dynamics: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, May.
    10. Oscar Ruíz-Carmona & Jorge M. Islas-Samperio & Lourdes Larrondo-Posadas & Fabio Manzini & Genice K. Grande-Acosta & Christian Álvarez-Escobedo, 2021. "Solid Biofuels Scenarios from Rural Agricultural and Forestry Residues for Mexican Industrial SMEs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:8:y:2015:i:12:p:12399-13863:d:60111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.