IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v7y2014i4p2051-2078d34599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priority-Based Hierarchical Operational Management for Multiagent-Based Microgrids

Author

Listed:
  • Takumi Kato

    (Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
    Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3-09, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan)

  • Hideyuki Takahashi

    (Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
    Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3-09, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan)

  • Kazuto Sasai

    (Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
    Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3-09, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan)

  • Gen Kitagata

    (Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
    Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3-09, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan)

  • Hak-Man Kim

    (Department of Electrical Engineering, Incheon National University, 12-1 Songdo-dong, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 406-772, Korea)

  • Tetsuo Kinoshita

    (Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University, Katahira 2-1-1, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
    Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba 6-3-09, Aramaki-aza, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan)

Abstract

Electricity consumption in the world is constantly increasing, making our lives become more and more dependent on electricity. There are several new paradigms proposed in the field of power grids. In Japan, especially after the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011, the new power grid paradigms are expected to be more resilient to survive several difficulties during disasters. In this paper, we focus on microgrids and propose priority-based hierarchical operational management for multiagent-based microgrids. The proposed management is a new multiagent-based load shedding scheme and multiagent-based hierarchical architecture to realize such resilient microgrids. We developed a prototype system and performed an evaluation of the proposed management using the developed system. The result of the evaluation shows the effectiveness of our proposal in power shortage situations, such as disasters.

Suggested Citation

  • Takumi Kato & Hideyuki Takahashi & Kazuto Sasai & Gen Kitagata & Hak-Man Kim & Tetsuo Kinoshita, 2014. "Priority-Based Hierarchical Operational Management for Multiagent-Based Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-28, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:4:p:2051-2078:d:34599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/4/2051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/7/4/2051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming-Tse Kuo & Shiue-Der Lu, 2013. "Design and Implementation of Real-Time Intelligent Control and Structure Based on Multi-Agent Systems in Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Aumann, Robert J. & Maschler, Michael, 1985. "Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 195-213, August.
    3. Hak-Man Kim & Yujin Lim & Tetsuo Kinoshita, 2012. "An Intelligent Multiagent System for Autonomous Microgrid Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Kyriakarakos, George & Piromalis, Dimitrios D. & Dounis, Anastasios I. & Arvanitis, Konstantinos G. & Papadakis, George, 2013. "Intelligent demand side energy management system for autonomous polygeneration microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 39-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Howell, Shaun & Rezgui, Yacine & Hippolyte, Jean-Laurent & Jayan, Bejay & Li, Haijiang, 2017. "Towards the next generation of smart grids: Semantic and holonic multi-agent management of distributed energy resources," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 193-214.
    2. Nah-Oak Song & Ji-Hye Lee & Hak-Man Kim & Yong Hoon Im & Jae Yong Lee, 2015. "Optimal Energy Management of Multi-Microgrids with Sequentially Coordinated Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Kofinas, P. & Dounis, A.I. & Vouros, G.A., 2018. "Fuzzy Q-Learning for multi-agent decentralized energy management in microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 53-67.
    4. Kuznetsova, Elizaveta & Li, Yan-Fu & Ruiz, Carlos & Zio, Enrico, 2014. "An integrated framework of agent-based modelling and robust optimization for microgrid energy management," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 70-88.
    5. Nah-Oak Song & Ji-Hye Lee & Hak-Man Kim, 2016. "Optimal Electric and Heat Energy Management of Multi-Microgrids with Sequentially-Coordinated Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Emin Karagözoğlu, 2014. "A noncooperative approach to bankruptcy problems with an endogenous estate," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 217(1), pages 299-318, June.
    7. William Thomson, 2007. "On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 11(3), pages 225-251, November.
    8. Gabrielle Demange & Michel L. Balinski, 1989. "An Axiomatic Approach to Proportionality between Matrices," Post-Print halshs-00670952, HAL.
    9. Ketelaars, Martijn & Borm, Peter & Herings, P.J.J., 2023. "Duality in Financial Networks," Other publications TiSEM 26750293-9599-4e05-9ae1-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Erlanson, Albin & Szwagrzak, Karol, 2013. "Strategy-Proof Package Assignment," Working Papers 2013:43, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    11. Peter Knudsen & Lars Østerdal, 2012. "Merging and splitting in cooperative games: some (im)possibility results," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(4), pages 763-774, November.
    12. Juan Moreno-Ternero & Antonio Villar, 2006. "The TAL-Family of Rules for Bankruptcy Problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27(2), pages 231-249, October.
    13. Cano Berlanga, Sebastian & Giménez Gómez, José M. (José Manuel) & Vilella Bach, Misericòrdia, 2015. "Enjoying cooperative games: The R package GameTheory," Working Papers 2072/247653, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    14. Juarez, Ruben & Ko, Chiu Yu & Xue, Jingyi, 2018. "Sharing sequential values in a network," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 734-779.
    15. Wulf Gaertner & Richard Bradley & Yongsheng Xu & Lars Schwettmann, 2019. "Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Vijay V. Vazirani, 2024. "The Assignment Game: New Mechanisms for Equitable Core Imputations," Papers 2402.11437, arXiv.org.
    17. Erik Ansink & Hans-Peter Weikard, 2012. "Sequential sharing rules for river sharing problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(2), pages 187-210, February.
    18. Jingyi Xue, 2018. "Fair division with uncertain needs," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(1), pages 105-136, June.
    19. Lahiri, Somdeb, 2001. "Axiomatic characterizations of the CEA solution for rationing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 162-170, May.
    20. Giulia Cesari & Roberto Lucchetti & Stefano Moretti, 2017. "Generalized additive games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 919-939, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:7:y:2014:i:4:p:2051-2078:d:34599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.