IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i4p771-d1585791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Comparative Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods to Evaluate Criteria Weighting in Assessments of Onshore Wind Farm Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitra G. Vagiona

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

This research provides a comparative analysis of different methods of weighting criteria used in the investigation of site suitability of existing onshore wind farm projects. The ranking of this suitability was performed by integrating various multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. The assessments of the site suitability of such projects considered several criteria, including wind velocity, distance from high-electricity grids, slope, distance from road networks, installed capacity, distance from protected areas, years of operation, and distance from settlements. Both subjective and objective methods were used to compute criteria weights and compare the results, which is the main contribution of the paper. This is especially significant, as criteria weighting in the wind farm siting literature is mainly focused on subjective methods, and therefore the criteria weights are provided by subjective judgments. In this study, 374 existing onshore wind farm projects in Greece served as alternatives, and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method was employed to rank their suitability. The results show very high positive correlations in the rankings of both the evaluation criteria and the alternatives when subjective methods are used. Using objective weighting methods may provide a robust solution when expert judgement is missing, and the CRITIC method seems to present a high correlation with subjective MCDM methods regarding the ranking of alternatives. Various MCDM methods could be used to assess the weighting of criteria in challenges related to site suitability of renewable energy projects, as they can aid in the selection of the most sustainable sites while minimizing the downsides and maximizing the benefits of each method.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2025. "The Use of Comparative Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods to Evaluate Criteria Weighting in Assessments of Onshore Wind Farm Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:771-:d:1585791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/4/771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Odigie, O. & Munda, J.L., 2018. "A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: The case study of Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1853-1869.
    2. Shafiqur Rehman & Abdul Baseer Mohammed & Luai Alhems, 2020. "A Heuristic Approach to Siting and Design Optimization of an Onshore Wind Farm Layout," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Mareschal, Bertrand, 1988. "Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 54-64, January.
    4. Aleksandras Krylovas & Rūta Dadelienė & Natalja Kosareva & Stanislav Dadelo, 2019. "Comparative Evaluation and Ranking of the European Countries Based on the Interdependence between Human Development and Internal Security Indicators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Al-Yahyai, Sultan & Charabi, Yassine & Gastli, Adel & Al-Badi, Abdullah, 2012. "Wind farm land suitability indexing using multi-criteria analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 80-87.
    6. Ali, Shahid & Taweekun, Juntakan & Techato, Kuaanan & Waewsak, Jompob & Gyawali, Saroj, 2019. "GIS based site suitability assessment for wind and solar farms in Songkhla, Thailand," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1360-1372.
    7. Kim, Choong-Ki & Jang, Seonju & Kim, Tae Yun, 2018. "Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 151-162.
    8. Ma, Jian & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Huang, Li-Hua, 1999. "A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(2), pages 397-404, January.
    9. Maria Panagiotidou & George Xydis & Christopher Koroneos, 2016. "Environmental Siting Framework for Wind Farms: A Case Study in the Dodecanese Islands," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2021. "Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Cunden, Tyagaraja S.M. & Doorga, Jay & Lollchund, Michel R. & Rughooputh, Soonil D.D.V., 2020. "Multi-level constraints wind farms siting for a complex terrain in a tropical region using MCDM approach coupled with GIS," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Höfer, Tim & Sunak, Yasin & Siddique, Hafiz & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "Wind farm siting using a spatial Analytic Hierarchy Process approach: A case study of the Städteregion Aachen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 222-243.
    13. Simsek, Yeliz & Watts, David & Escobar, Rodrigo, 2018. "Sustainability evaluation of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) projects under Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) by using Multi Criteria Decision Method (MCDM)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 421-438.
    14. Villacreses, Geovanna & Gaona, Gabriel & Martínez-Gómez, Javier & Jijón, Diego Juan, 2017. "Wind farms suitability location using geographical information system (GIS), based on multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods: The case of continental Ecuador," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 275-286.
    15. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K. & Yadav, S.S. & Kumar, Gaurav, 2021. "MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 865-884.
    16. Anne A. Gharaibeh & Deema A. Al-Shboul & Abdulla M. Al-Rawabdeh & Rasheed A. Jaradat, 2021. "Establishing Regional Power Sustainability and Feasibility Using Wind Farm Land-Use Optimization," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-32, April.
    17. Baseer, M.A. & Rehman, S. & Meyer, J.P. & Alam, Md. Mahbub, 2017. "GIS-based site suitability analysis for wind farm development in Saudi Arabia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1166-1176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Styliani Karamountzou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Suitability and Sustainability Assessment of Existing Onshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    3. Nagababu, Garlapati & Puppala, Harish & Pritam, Kocherlakota & Kantipudi, MVV Prasad, 2022. "Two-stage GIS-MCDM based algorithm to identify plausible regions at micro level to install wind farms: A case study of India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    4. Dehghan, Hassan & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Shahsavari, Ardavan, 2022. "Multicriteria decision and Geographic Information System-based locational analysis and techno-economic assessment of a hybrid energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 189-199.
    5. Xu, Ye & Li, Ye & Zheng, Lijun & Cui, Liang & Li, Sha & Li, Wei & Cai, Yanpeng, 2020. "Site selection of wind farms using GIS and multi-criteria decision making method in Wafangdian, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Elkadeem, Mohamed R. & Younes, Ali & Mazzeo, Domenico & Jurasz, Jakub & Elia Campana, Pietro & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Alaam, Mohamed A., 2022. "Geospatial-assisted multi-criterion analysis of solar and wind power geographical-technical-economic potential assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    7. Shao, Meng & Han, Zhixin & Sun, Jinwei & Xiao, Chengsi & Zhang, Shulei & Zhao, Yuanxu, 2020. "A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 377-403.
    8. Mohammed Ifkirne & Houssam El Bouhi & Siham Acharki & Quoc Bao Pham & Abdelouahed Farah & Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh, 2022. "Multi-Criteria GIS-Based Analysis for Mapping Suitable Sites for Onshore Wind Farms in Southeast France," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    9. Hasan Eroğlu, 2021. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for wind power plant location selection based on fuzzy AHP and geographic information systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18278-18310, December.
    10. Shao, Meng & Zhao, Yuanxu & Sun, Jinwei & Han, Zhixin & Shao, Zhuxiao, 2023. "A decision framework for tidal current power plant site selection based on GIS-MCDM: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    11. Dimitris Ioannidis & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2024. "Optimal Wind Farm Siting Using a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: Evaluating the Island of Andros, Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-25, May.
    12. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K. & Yadav, S.S. & Kumar, Gaurav, 2021. "MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 865-884.
    13. Waewsak, Jompob & Ali, Shahid & Natee, Warut & Kongruang, Chuleerat & Chancham, Chana & Gagnon, Yves, 2020. "Assessment of hybrid, firm renewable energy-based power plants: Application in the southernmost region of Thailand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    14. Geovanna Villacreses & Diego Jijón & Juan Francisco Nicolalde & Javier Martínez-Gómez & Franz Betancourt, 2022. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis of Suitable Location for Wind and Photovoltaic Power Plants on the Galápagos Islands," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Sofia Spyridonidou & Georgia Sismani & Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Hagit Ulanovsky & Daniel Madar, 2021. "Sustainable Spatial Energy Planning of Large-Scale Wind and PV Farms in Israel: A Collaborative and Participatory Planning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Yildiz, S.S., 2024. "Spatial multi-criteria decision making approach for wind farm site selection: A case study in Balıkesir, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Vinhoza, Amanda & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2021. "Brazil's offshore wind energy potential assessment based on a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Elkadeem, M.R. & Younes, Ali & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Campana, Pietro Elia & Wang, Shaorong, 2021. "Sustainable siting and design optimization of hybrid renewable energy system: A geospatial multi-criteria analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    19. Kleanthis Xenitidis & Konstantinos Ioannou & Georgios Tsantopoulos & Dimitrios Myronidis, 2023. "On the Usage of Artificial Neural Networks for the Determination of Optimal Wind Farms Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Alphan, Hakan, 2024. "Incorporating visibility information into multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) for wind turbine deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:4:p:771-:d:1585791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.