IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p663-d1580924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of Post-Production Waste from Winemaking of Selected Vitis vinifera L. Varieties Grown in Temperate Climates and Their Energy Valorization

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Kapłan

    (Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Maj

    (Department of Power Engineering and Transportation, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Kamila E. Klimek

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Kamil Buczyński

    (Institute of Horticulture Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Borkowska

    (Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland)

  • Radek Sotolář

    (Department of Viticulture and Enology, Mendel University in Brno, 691-44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

  • Richard Danko

    (Department of Viticulture and Enology, Mendel University in Brno, 691-44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

  • Mojmir Baroň

    (Department of Viticulture and Enology, Mendel University in Brno, 691-44 Lednice, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The study assessed the yield and quality as well as the energy potential of biomass from stalks and pomace of four grape varieties, Riesling, Chardonnay, Zweigelt, and Merlot Vitis vinifera L., grown in temperate climate conditions. The research is innovative because the evaluation of the energy potential of biomass originating from Vitis vinifera L. has not been carried out so far in the northern wine-growing regions. Field studies were conducted in 2023 in the Experimental Vineyard of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin, located in southeastern Poland. Biometric yield assessment showed that Chardonnay vines were characterized by the lowest mass of clusters and peduncles, number of berries in the cluster, berry diameter, and peduncle size, and at the same time the highest berry mass among the assessed biotypes. Merlot clusters were characterized by the highest mass of clusters and the largest peduncles. Riesling had the most berries in the cluster, the heaviest peduncles, and the highest share of peduncles in the cluster mass (8.99%). For grape pomace, the LHV values range from 15.98 MJ kg −1 for the Chardonnay variety to 16.91 MJ kg −1 for Riesling, while for peduncles, these values range from 15.11 MJ·kg −1 for Merlot and Riesling to 15.26 MJ kg −1 for Chardonnay. The differences in pollutant emissions are more pronounced between grapevine varieties than between types of biomass (pomace vs. peduncles). The greatest variation among varieties was observed for carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions in the pomace category, while the smallest differences were noted for sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) emissions. Total gas emissions were highest for Zweigelt pomace (7.72 Nm 3 kg −1 ) and lowest for Merlot (6.99 Nm 3 kg −1 ), while for stalks, Chardonnay had the highest values (6.77 Nm 3 kg −1 ) and Merlot the lowest (7.32 Nm 3 kg −1 ). The largest variation among varieties was observed in the pomace category. These results indicate differences in exhaust gas emissions for different plant parts and grape varieties, which are relevant for optimizing production processes and ensuring sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Kapłan & Grzegorz Maj & Kamila E. Klimek & Kamil Buczyński & Anna Borkowska & Radek Sotolář & Richard Danko & Mojmir Baroň, 2025. "Characterization of Post-Production Waste from Winemaking of Selected Vitis vinifera L. Varieties Grown in Temperate Climates and Their Energy Valorization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:663-:d:1580924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/663/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/663/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:663-:d:1580924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.