IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i9p2181-d1387825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing the Most Suitable Working Fluid for a CTEC

Author

Listed:
  • Aliet Achkienasi

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Rodolfo Silva

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Edgar Mendoza

    (Instituto de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico)

  • Luis D. Luna

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università Degli Studi Della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Viale Abramo Lincoln n. 5, 81100 Caserta, Italy)

Abstract

This study aims to explore additional fluids beneficial for coastal thermal energy converter (CTEC) operation. Ammonia’s thermodynamic properties, characterized by higher condensation temperatures and pressures, demand significantly elevated operating pressures, resulting in a substantial energy load for efficient operation. Thus, exploring alternatives such as R134a becomes crucial, particularly considering its potential as a better working fluid for power generation in a Rankine cycle. The research methodology involves employing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations alongside experimental investigations to examine the performance of an axial turbine concept under different working fluids. The results obtained indicate that R134a is the most appropriate working fluid for an axial turbine within a CTEC, outperforming ammonia, thereby implying significantly better operational efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliet Achkienasi & Rodolfo Silva & Edgar Mendoza & Luis D. Luna, 2024. "Choosing the Most Suitable Working Fluid for a CTEC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2181-:d:1387825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/9/2181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Chengbin & Wu, Zhe & Wang, Jiadian & Ding, Ce & Gao, Tieyu & Chen, Yongping, 2023. "Thermodynamic performance of a radial-inflow turbine for ocean thermal energy conversion using ammonia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 907-920.
    2. Ma, Qingfen & Gao, Zezhou & Huang, Jie & Mahian, Omid & Feng, Xin & Lu, Hui & Wang, Shenghui & Wang, Chengpeng & Tang, Rongnian & Li, Jingru, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis and turbine design of a 100 kW OTEC-ORC with binary non-azeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    3. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Peypoch, Nicolas, 2008. "Technical efficiency of thermoelectric power plants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 3118-3127, November.
    4. Hsieh, Jui-Ching & Chen, Yen-Hsun & Hsieh, Yi-Chi, 2023. "Experimental study of an organic Rankine cycle with a variable-rotational-speed scroll expander at various heat source temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Zhiqi & Zhang, Sifeng & Xia, Xiaoxia & Zhao, Yabin & Yi, Qianghui & Zhang, Xiaoyue, 2024. "Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of organic Rankine cycle coupled vapor compression refrigeration system with a zeotropic mixture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    2. Oh, Dong-hyun, 2015. "Productivity growth, technical change and economies of scale of Korean fossil-fuel generation companies, 2001–2012: A dual approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 113-121.
    3. Fatigati, Fabio & Di Bartolomeo, Marco & Cipollone, Roberto, 2024. "Model-based optimisation of solar-assisted ORC-based power unit for domestic micro-cogeneration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    4. Lynes, Melissa & Featherstone, Allen, 2015. "Economic Efficiency of Utility Plants Under Renewable Energy Policy," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205674, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Xiangxiang Sun & Lawrence Loh, 2019. "Sustainability Governance in China: An Analysis of Regional Ecological Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Li, Feng & Zhang, Danlu & Zhang, Jinyu & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Measuring the energy production and utilization efficiency of Chinese thermal power industry with the fixed-sum carbon emission constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    7. Jindal, Abhinav & Nilakantan, Rahul, 2021. "Falling efficiency levels of Indian coal-fired power plants: A slacks-based analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Chen, Zhongfei & Barros, Carlos Pestana & Borges, Maria Rosa, 2015. "A Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis of Chinese fossil-fuel electricity generation companies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 136-144.
    9. Lin, Boqiang & Sai, Rockson, 2021. "A multi factor Malmquist CO2emission performance indices: Evidence from Sub Saharan African public thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    10. Wang, Zhe & Cao, Menglong & Tang, Haobo & Ji, Yulong & Han, Fenghui, 2024. "A global heat flow topology for revealing the synergistic effects of heat transfer and thermal power conversion in large scale systems: Methodology and case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    11. Gharneh, Naser Shams & Nabavieh, Alireza & Gholamiangonabadi, Davoud & Alimoradi, Mohammad, 2014. "Productivity change and its determinants: Application of the Malmquist index with bootstrapping in Iranian steam power plants," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 114-120.
    12. Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh & Peter Wanke & Ali Jamshidi, 2020. "What Does Cost Structure Have to Say about Thermal Plant Energy Efficiency? The Case from Angola," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Zhang, Ning & Wei, Xiao, 2015. "Dynamic total factor carbon emissions performance changes in the Chinese transportation industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 409-420.
    14. Yongrok Choi & Hyoung Seok Lee, 2016. "Are Emissions Trading Policies Sustainable? A Study of the Petrochemical Industry in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Barros, Carlos Pestana & Chen, Zhongfei & Managi, Shunsuke & Antunes, Olinda Sequeira, 2013. "Examining the cost efficiency of Chinese hydroelectric companies using a finite mixture model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 511-517.
    16. Mana, A.A. & Kaitouni, S.I. & Kousksou, T. & Jamil, A., 2023. "Enhancing sustainable energy conversion: Comparative study of superheated and recuperative ORC systems for waste heat recovery and geothermal applications, with focus on 4E performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    17. Yao, Xin & Guo, Chengwen & Shao, Shuai & Jiang, Zhujun, 2016. "Total-factor CO2 emission performance of China’s provincial industrial sector: A meta-frontier non-radial Malmquist index approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1142-1153.
    18. Hampf, Benjamin, 2017. "Rational inefficiency, adjustment costs and sequential technologies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 1095-1108.
    19. Nabavieh, Alireza & Gholamiangonabadi, Davoud & Ahangaran, Ali Asghar, 2015. "Dynamic changes in CO2 emission performance of different types of Iranian fossil-fuel power plants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(PA), pages 142-150.
    20. Jie Wu & Panpan Xia & Qingyuan Zhu & Junfei Chu, 2019. "Measuring environmental efficiency of thermoelectric power plants: a common equilibrium efficient frontier DEA approach with fixed-sum undesirable output," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 731-749, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:9:p:2181-:d:1387825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.