IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i2p518-d1323244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospects of Hydrogen Application as a Fuel for Large-Scale Compressed-Air Energy Storages

Author

Listed:
  • Iliya K. Iliev

    (Department of Heat, Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering, “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria)

  • Alexander V. Fedyukhin

    (Department of Energy Efficiency and Hydrogen Technology, National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow 111250, Russia)

  • Daniil V. Semin

    (Department of Energy Efficiency and Hydrogen Technology, National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow 111250, Russia)

  • Yulia S. Valeeva

    (Department of Economics and Enterprise Management, Russian University of Cooperation, Kazan 420034, Russia)

  • Stanislav A. Dronov

    (Department of Energy Efficiency and Hydrogen Technology, National Research University Moscow Power Engineering Institute, Moscow 111250, Russia)

  • Ivan H. Beloev

    (Department of Transport, “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria)

Abstract

A promising method of energy storage is the combination of hydrogen and compressed-air energy storage (CAES) systems. CAES systems are divided into diabatic, adiabatic, and isothermal cycles. In the diabatic cycle, thermal energy after air compression is discharged into the environment, and the scheme implies the use of organic fuel. Taking into account the prospects of the decarbonization of the energy industry, it is advisable to replace natural gas in the diabatic CAES scheme with hydrogen obtained by electrolysis using power-to-gas technology. In this article, the SENECA-1A project is considered as a high-power hybrid unit, using hydrogen instead of natural gas. The results show that while keeping the 214 MW turbines powered, the transition to hydrogen reduces carbon dioxide emissions from 8.8 to 0.0 kg/s, while the formation of water vapor will increase from 17.6 to 27.4 kg/s. It is shown that the adiabatic CAES SENECA-1A mode, compared to the diabatic, has 0.0 carbon dioxide and water vapor emission with relatively higher efficiency (71.5 vs. 62.1%). At the same time, the main advantage of the diabatic CAES is the possibility to produce more power in the turbine block (214 vs. 131.6 MW), having fewer capital costs. Thus, choosing the technology is a subject of complex technical, economic, and ecological study.

Suggested Citation

  • Iliya K. Iliev & Alexander V. Fedyukhin & Daniil V. Semin & Yulia S. Valeeva & Stanislav A. Dronov & Ivan H. Beloev, 2024. "Prospects of Hydrogen Application as a Fuel for Large-Scale Compressed-Air Energy Storages," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:518-:d:1323244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/518/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/518/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stadler, Ingo, 2008. "Power grid balancing of energy systems with high renewable energy penetration by demand response," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 90-98, June.
    2. DeCesaro, Jennifer & Porter, Kevin & Milligan, Michael, 2009. "Wind Energy and Power System Operations: A Review of Wind Integration Studies to Date," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(10), pages 34-43, December.
    3. Bloess, Andreas & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2018. "Power-to-heat for renewable energy integration: A review of technologies, modeling approaches, and flexibility potentials," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 212, pages 1611-1626.
    4. Budt, Marcus & Wolf, Daniel & Span, Roland & Yan, Jinyue, 2016. "A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 250-268.
    5. Steffen, Bjarne & Weber, Christoph, 2013. "Efficient storage capacity in power systems with thermal and renewable generation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 556-567.
    6. Huber, Matthias & Dimkova, Desislava & Hamacher, Thomas, 2014. "Integration of wind and solar power in Europe: Assessment of flexibility requirements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 236-246.
    7. Han, Zhonghe & Guo, Senchuang, 2018. "Investigation of operation strategy of combined cooling, heating and power(CCHP) system based on advanced adiabatic compressed air energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 290-308.
    8. Buttler, Alexander & Spliethoff, Hartmut, 2018. "Current status of water electrolysis for energy storage, grid balancing and sector coupling via power-to-gas and power-to-liquids: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2440-2454.
    9. Emiliano Borri & Alessio Tafone & Gabriele Comodi & Alessandro Romagnoli & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2022. "Compressed Air Energy Storage—An Overview of Research Trends and Gaps through a Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gawlick, Julia & Hamacher, Thomas, 2023. "Impact of coupling the electricity and hydrogen sector in a zero-emission European energy system in 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Batas Bjelić, Ilija & Rajaković, Nikola & Krajačić, Goran & Duić, Neven, 2016. "Two methods for decreasing the flexibility gap in national energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P3), pages 1701-1709.
    3. Alexander Kies & Bruno U. Schyska & Lueder Von Bremen, 2016. "The Demand Side Management Potential to Balance a Highly Renewable European Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Philip Tafarte & Annedore Kanngießer & Martin Dotzauer & Benedikt Meyer & Anna Grevé & Markus Millinger, 2020. "Interaction of Electrical Energy Storage, Flexible Bioenergy Plants and System-friendly Renewables in Wind- or Solar PV-dominated Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Haas, J. & Cebulla, F. & Cao, K. & Nowak, W. & Palma-Behnke, R. & Rahmann, C. & Mancarella, P., 2017. "Challenges and trends of energy storage expansion planning for flexibility provision in low-carbon power systems – a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 603-619.
    6. Boßmann, Tobias & Eser, Eike Johannes, 2016. "Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1637-1656.
    7. Godoy-González, Diego & Gil, Esteban & Gutiérrez-Alcaraz, Guillermo, 2020. "Ramping ancillary service for cost-based electricity markets with high penetration of variable renewable energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Marcin Jankowski & Anna Pałac & Krzysztof Sornek & Wojciech Goryl & Maciej Żołądek & Maksymilian Homa & Mariusz Filipowicz, 2024. "Status and Development Perspectives of the Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Technologies—A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-46, April.
    9. Vanegas Cantarero, María Mercedes, 2018. "Reviewing the Nicaraguan transition to a renewable energy system: Why is “business-as-usual” no longer an option?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 580-592.
    10. Cruz, Marco R.M. & Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Santos, Sérgio F. & Catalão, João P.S., 2018. "A comprehensive survey of flexibility options for supporting the low-carbon energy future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 338-353.
    11. Kondziella, Hendrik & Bruckner, Thomas, 2016. "Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 10-22.
    12. Osorio-Aravena, Juan Carlos & Aghahosseini, Arman & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Caldera, Upeksha & Ghorbani, Narges & Mensah, Theophilus Nii Odai & Haas, Jannik & Muñoz-Cerón, Emilio & Breyer, Christian, 2023. "Synergies of electrical and sectoral integration: Analysing geographical multi-node scenarios with sector coupling variations for a transition towards a fully renewables-based energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    13. Cesare Saccani & Marco Pellegrini & Alessandro Guzzini, 2020. "Analysis of the Existing Barriers for the Market Development of Power to Hydrogen (P2H) in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-29, September.
    14. Vieira, Felipe Seabra & Balestieri, José Antonio Perrella & Matelli, José Alexandre, 2021. "Applications of compressed air energy storage in cogeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    15. Koj, Jan Christian & Wulf, Christina & Zapp, Petra, 2019. "Environmental impacts of power-to-X systems - A review of technological and methodological choices in Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 865-879.
    16. Reinhard Haas & Claudia Kemfert & Hans Auer & Amela Ajanovic & Marlene Sayer & Albert Hiesl, 2022. "On the economics of storage for electricity: Current state and future market design prospects," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(3), May.
    17. Stefan Arens & Sunke Schlüters & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2020. "Sustainable Residential Energy Supply: A Literature Review-Based Morphological Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, January.
    18. Iva Ridjan Skov & Noémi Schneider & Gerald Schweiger & Josef-Peter Schöggl & Alfred Posch, 2021. "Power-to-X in Denmark: An Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Kotowicz, Janusz & Bartela, Łukasz & Węcel, Daniel & Dubiel, Klaudia, 2017. "Hydrogen generator characteristics for storage of renewably-generated energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 156-171.
    20. Liu, Zhan & Yang, Xuqing & Liu, Xu & Wang, Wenbin & Yang, Xiaohu, 2021. "Evaluation of a trigeneration system based on adiabatic compressed air energy storage and absorption heat pump: Thermodynamic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:518-:d:1323244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.