IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p5847-d1526743.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fusion Model for Predicting the Vibration Trends of Hydropower Units

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Liu

    (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China
    Hubei Technology Innovation Center for Smart Hydropower, Wuhan 430019, China)

  • Youchun Pi

    (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China
    Hubei Technology Innovation Center for Smart Hydropower, Wuhan 430019, China)

  • Zhengyang Tang

    (China Yangtze Power Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China
    Hubei Technology Innovation Center for Smart Hydropower, Wuhan 430019, China)

  • Hongpeng Hua

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Design and Maintenance of Hydropower Machinery, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

  • Xiaopeng Wang

    (Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Design and Maintenance of Hydropower Machinery, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China)

Abstract

Hydropower units are essential to the safe, stable, and efficient operation of modern power systems, particularly given the current expansion of renewable energy systems. To enable timely monitoring of unit performance, it is critical to investigate the trends in vibration signals, to enhance the accuracy and reliability of vibration trend prediction models. This paper proposes a fusion model for the vibration signal trend prediction of hydropower units based on the waveform extension method empirical mode decomposition (W-EMD) and long short-term memory neural network (LSTMNN). The fusion model first employed a waveform matching extension method based on parameter ergodic optimization to extend the original signal. Secondly, EMD was used to decompose the extended signal sequence and reconstruct the decomposition components by the extreme point division method, and the reconstructed high- and low-frequency components were used as LSTMNN inputs for component prediction. Finally, the component prediction results were superimposed with equal weights to obtain the predicted value of the vibration signal trend of the hydropower unit. The experimental results showed that the W-EMD signal decomposition method can effectively suppress the endpoint effect problem in the traditional EMD algorithm, improving the quality of EMD decomposition. Furthermore, through a case study of the upper guide X direction swing signal on the 16F unit of a domestic hydropower station, it was found that the proposed fusion model successfully predicted anomalies in the unit’s swing signals; compared with SVR, KELM, LSTMNN, and EMD + LSTMNN, the prediction accuracy was improved by 78.94%, 66.67%, 55.56%, and 42.86%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Liu & Youchun Pi & Zhengyang Tang & Hongpeng Hua & Xiaopeng Wang, 2024. "A Fusion Model for Predicting the Vibration Trends of Hydropower Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5847-:d:1526743
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5847/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/5847/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyndman, Rob J. & Koehler, Anne B., 2006. "Another look at measures of forecast accuracy," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 679-688.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:prg:jnlcfu:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:id:572 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chang, Andrew C. & Hanson, Tyler J., 2016. "The accuracy of forecasts prepared for the Federal Open Market Committee," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 23-43.
    3. Frank, Johannes, 2023. "Forecasting realized volatility in turbulent times using temporal fusion transformers," FAU Discussion Papers in Economics 03/2023, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Institute for Economics.
    4. Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Petropoulos, Fotios & Trapero, Juan R., 2014. "Improving forecasting by estimating time series structural components across multiple frequencies," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 291-302.
    5. Paulo Júlio & Pedro M. Esperança, 2012. "Evaluating the forecast quality of GDP components: An application to G7," GEE Papers 0047, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Apr 2012.
    6. Cameron Roach & Rob Hyndman & Souhaib Ben Taieb, 2021. "Non‐linear mixed‐effects models for time series forecasting of smart meter demand," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(6), pages 1118-1130, September.
    7. Alysha M De Livera, 2010. "Automatic forecasting with a modified exponential smoothing state space framework," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 10/10, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    8. Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Thomas, Alice Carole & Wang, Jianxin, 2023. "The economic impact of daily volatility persistence on energy markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    9. I. Yu. Zolotova & V. V. Dvorkin, 2017. "Short-term forecasting of prices for the Russian wholesale electricity market based on neural networks," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 608-615, November.
    10. Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Müller, Karsten, 2019. "Has macroeconomic forecasting changed after the Great Recession? Panel-based evidence on forecast accuracy and forecaster behavior from Germany," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Thiyanga S. Talagala & Feng Li & Yanfei Kang, 2019. "Feature-based Forecast-Model Performance Prediction," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 21/19, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    12. Martin Guth, 2022. "Predicting Default Probabilities for Stress Tests: A Comparison of Models," Papers 2202.03110, arXiv.org.
    13. Santamaría-Bonfil, G. & Reyes-Ballesteros, A. & Gershenson, C., 2016. "Wind speed forecasting for wind farms: A method based on support vector regression," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 790-809.
    14. Meira, Erick & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2022. "Forecasting natural gas consumption using Bagging and modified regularization techniques," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Wasilewski, J. & Baczynski, D., 2017. "Short-term electric energy production forecasting at wind power plants in pareto-optimality context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 177-187.
    16. Huber, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner, 2020. "Daily retail demand forecasting using machine learning with emphasis on calendric special days," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1420-1438.
    17. Goldsworthy, M. & Moore, T. & Peristy, M. & Grimeland, M., 2022. "Cloud-based model-predictive-control of a battery storage system at a commercial site," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    18. Bialowolski, Piotr & Kuszewski, Tomasz & Witkowski, Bartosz, 2015. "Bayesian averaging vs. dynamic factor models for forecasting economic aggregates with tendency survey data," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 9, pages 1-37.
    19. Kunze, Frederik, 2017. "Predicting exchange rates in Asia: New insights on the accuracy of survey forecasts," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 326, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    20. Drachal, Krzysztof, 2021. "Forecasting crude oil real prices with averaging time-varying VAR models," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    21. Banerjee, Nilabhra & Morton, Alec & Akartunalı, Kerem, 2020. "Passenger demand forecasting in scheduled transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 797-810.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:5847-:d:1526743. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.