IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i21p5309-d1506417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of the Intake Geometry on the Performance of a Four-Stroke SI Engine for Aeronautical Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Anaclerio

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimenti, Risorse Naturali e Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy)

  • Annarita Viggiano

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

  • Francesco Fornarelli

    (Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimenti, Risorse Naturali e Ingegneria, Università degli Studi di Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy)

  • Paolo Caso

    (Costruzioni Motori Diesel CMD S.p.A., 81020 San Nicola La Strada, Italy)

  • Domenico Sparaco

    (Costruzioni Motori Diesel CMD S.p.A., 81020 San Nicola La Strada, Italy)

  • Vinicio Magi

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, Italy)

Abstract

In this work, the influence of plenum and port geometry on the performance of the intake process in a four-stroke spark ignition engine for ultralight aircraft applications is analyzed. Three intake systems are considered: the so-called “standard plenum”, with a relatively small plenum volume, the “V1 plenum”, with a larger plenum volume, and the “standard plenum” equipped with a large curvature manifold called the “G2 port”. Both measurements and 3D CFD simulations, by using Ansys ® Academic Fluent, Release 20.2, are performed to characterize and analyze the steady-flow field in the intake system for selected valve lifts. The experimental data and the numerical results are in excellent agreement with each other. The results show that at the maximum valve lift, i.e., 12 mm, the V1 plenum allows an increase in the air mass flow rate of 9.1% and 9.4% compared to the standard plenum and the standard plenum with the “G2 port”, respectively. In addition, the volumetric efficiency has been estimated under unsteady-flow conditions for all geometries at relatively high engine rpms. The difference between numerical results and measurements is less than 1% for the standard plenum, thus proving the accuracy of the model, which is then used to study the other configurations. The V1 plenum shows a fairly constant volumetric efficiency as the engine speed increases, although such an efficiency is lower than that of the other two geometries considered in this work. Specifically, the use of the “G2 port” leads to an increase of 1.5% in terms of volumetric efficiency with respect to the configuration with the original manifold. Furthermore, for the “G2 port” configuration, higher turbulent kinetic energy and higher swirl and tumble ratios are observed. This is expected to result in an improvement of air–fuel mixing and flame propagation.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Anaclerio & Annarita Viggiano & Francesco Fornarelli & Paolo Caso & Domenico Sparaco & Vinicio Magi, 2024. "The Influence of the Intake Geometry on the Performance of a Four-Stroke SI Engine for Aeronautical Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:21:p:5309-:d:1506417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/21/5309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/21/5309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wahono, Bambang & Setiawan, Ardhika & Lim, Ocktaeck, 2021. "Effect of the intake port flow direction on the stability and characteristics of the in-cylinder flow field of a small motorcycle engine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Pan & Junfang Ma & Junyin Li & Hongzhe Liu & Jing Wei & Jingjing Xu & Tao Zhu & Hairui Zhang & Wei Li & Jiaying Pan, 2022. "Influence of Intake Port Structure on the Performance of a Spark-Ignited Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:21:p:5309-:d:1506417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.