IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i20p5215-d1502634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling and Numerical Investigations of Flowing N-Decane Partial Catalytic Steam Reforming at Supercritical Pressure

Author

Listed:
  • Fuqiang Chen

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Junbo He

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yu Feng

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Zhenhua Wang

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

Steam reforming is an effective method for improving heat sinks of hypersonic aircraft at high flight Mach numbers. However, unlike the industrial process of producing hydrogen with a high water content, the catalytic steam reforming mechanism for the regeneration cooling process of hydrocarbon fuels with a water content below 30% is still unclear. Catalytic steam reforming (CSR) and catalytic thermal cracking (CTC) reactions occur at low temperatures, with the main products being hydrogen and carbon oxides. Thermal cracking (TC) reactions occur at high temperatures, with the main products being alkanes and alkenes. The above reaction exists simultaneously in the regeneration cooling channel, which is referred to as partial catalytic steam reforming (PCSR). Based on the experimental measurement results, an improved neural network correction method was used to establish a four-step global reaction model for the PCSR of n-decane under low water conditions. The reliability of the four-step model was verified by combining the model with a numerical simulation program and comparing it with the experimental results obtained by electric heating hydrocarbon fuels with a pressure of 3 MPa and a water content of 5/10/15%. The experimental and predicted results using the developed kinetic model are consistent with an error of less than 5% in the decane conversion rate. The average absolute error between the fuel outlet temperature and total heat sink is less than 10%. Using the PCSR model to predict the heat transfer characteristics of mixed fuels with different water contents, the convective heat transfer coefficient is basically the same, and the Nu number is affected by the thermal conductivity coefficient, showing different patterns with changes in the water content.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuqiang Chen & Junbo He & Yu Feng & Zhenhua Wang, 2024. "Modeling and Numerical Investigations of Flowing N-Decane Partial Catalytic Steam Reforming at Supercritical Pressure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5215-:d:1502634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Min & Xiong, Zuhong & Fang, Kejing & Li, Xi & Li, Jiqing & Li, Tao, 2020. "Steam reforming of toluene over nickel catalysts supported on coal gangue ash," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 385-395.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Ningbo & Salisu, Jamilu & Quan, Cui & Williams, Paul, 2021. "Modified nickel-based catalysts for improved steam reforming of biomass tar: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    2. Li, Jie & Chang, Guozhang & Song, Ke & Hao, Bolun & Wang, Cuiping & Zhang, Jian & Yue, Guangxi & Hu, Shugang, 2023. "Influence of coal bottom ash additives on catalytic reforming of biomass pyrolysis gaseous tar and biochar/steam gasification reactivity," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 434-444.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5215-:d:1502634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.