IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i20p5108-d1498661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Deadwood in Forests between Climate Change Mitigation, Biodiversity Conservation, and Bioenergy Production: A Comparative Analysis Using a Bottom–Up Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Isabella De Meo

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, 50125 Firenze, Italy)

  • Kiomars Sefidi

    (Department of Forest Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5619911367, Iran)

  • Selim Bayraktar

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Forestry, İstanbul University—Cerrahpaşa, 34473 Istanbul, Türkiye)

  • Carlotta Sergiacomi

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Alessandro Paletto

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Research Centre for Forestry and Wood, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

Recent literature highlights the crucial role of deadwood in forests, emphasizing its contribution to biodiversity conservation, soil fertility, climate change mitigation, and bioenergy production. However, managing deadwood presents challenges as decision-makers must balance trade-offs and synergies between these ecological benefits. A participatory approach, incorporating user opinions, can support effective decision-making. This study surveyed 1207 university students from Iran, Italy, and Türkiye to explore their perceptions of deadwood’s role and the potential trade-offs among climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and bioenergy production. Results indicate a high level of awareness among students regarding deadwood’s ecological functions, but preferences vary significantly across cultural and regional contexts. Results show that for students of all three countries, the most important function related to the deadwood in forests is the provision of microhabitats for wildlife, while in second place for Iranian students, there is bioenergy production, and for Turkish and Italian students, soil fertilization. In addition, results highlight that students prefer the management strategies based on leaving both standing dead trees and lying deadwood in the forest. This study reinforces existing literature on deadwood’s importance for biodiversity and underscores the need for informed policies that balance ecological values with practical management considerations.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabella De Meo & Kiomars Sefidi & Selim Bayraktar & Carlotta Sergiacomi & Alessandro Paletto, 2024. "The Role of Deadwood in Forests between Climate Change Mitigation, Biodiversity Conservation, and Bioenergy Production: A Comparative Analysis Using a Bottom–Up Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5108-:d:1498661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5108/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/20/5108/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oksana Pelyukh & Alessandro Paletto & Lyudmyla Zahvoyska, 2019. "People's attitudes towards deadwood in forest: evidence from the Ukrainian Carpathians," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(5), pages 171-182.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:20:p:5108-:d:1498661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.