IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i19p4904-d1489859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method for Evaluating Strategies towards a Cross-Country Renewable Energy Cooperation: The Cases of Egypt and Morocco

Author

Listed:
  • Aikaterini Papapostolou

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Charikleia Karakosta

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou, 15780 Athens, Greece
    Department of Business Administration, University of West Attica, Petrou Ralli & Thivon 250, 12244 Egaleo, Greece
    Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, 156 Egnatia Street, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Filippos-Dimitrios Mexis

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • Ioanna Andreoulaki

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou, 15780 Athens, Greece)

  • John Psarras

    (Decision Support Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechniou Str., Zografou, 15780 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Recognising the urgency of addressing climate change and the imperative to mitigate its effects, the European Union (EU) has embarked on a transformative journey to reshape its energy landscape, with a pronounced emphasis on harnessing renewable energy sources (RESs) and augmenting their contribution to electricity generation. To propel Europe towards sustainable development through its energy transition, EU member states are encouraged to foster collaborative efforts on a European scale, inviting neighbouring countries to participate in joint ventures aimed at leveraging RESs for electricity generation. Consequently, it becomes imperative to evaluate the potential depth of cooperation among these nations, assessing how such partnerships can align with Europe’s overarching objectives while fostering mutually beneficial conditions. This paper seeks to undertake a thorough analysis and evaluation of the potential impacts of such cooperation, both in advancing RES objectives and in promoting broader cooperation goals concerning the countries involved. The appropriate methodological framework has been developed, utilising and implementing the fuzzy PROMETHEE multicriteria decision analysis method, to address the problem’s multidimensional character, intending to implement an appropriate action plan and promote production from RESs. The methodology has been applied to assess alternative strategies in two case study countries, Morocco and Egypt, while important outcomes have emerged towards the successful implementation of cooperation mechanisms promoting RES.

Suggested Citation

  • Aikaterini Papapostolou & Charikleia Karakosta & Filippos-Dimitrios Mexis & Ioanna Andreoulaki & John Psarras, 2024. "A Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method for Evaluating Strategies towards a Cross-Country Renewable Energy Cooperation: The Cases of Egypt and Morocco," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4904-:d:1489859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/19/4904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahsa Montajabiha, 2016. "An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 221-244, March.
    2. Christina Wulf & Petra Zapp & Andrea Schreiber & Wilhelm Kuckshinrichs, 2021. "Setting Thresholds to Define Indifferences and Preferences in PROMETHEE for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of European Hydrogen Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Burak, Selmin & Samanlioglu, Funda & Ülker, Duygu, 2022. "Evaluation of irrigation methods in Söke Plain with HF-AHP-PROMETHEE II hybrid MCDM method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pasura Aungkulanon & Walailak Atthirawong & Pongchanun Luangpaiboon & Wirachchaya Chanpuypetch, 2024. "Navigating Supply Chain Resilience: A Hybrid Approach to Agri-Food Supplier Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-42, May.
    2. Burak, Selmin & Samanlioglu, Funda & Ulker, Duygu & Kup, Eyup Tolunay, 2024. "Ranking willingness to reuse water in cotton irrigation with hybrid MCDM methods: Soke plain case study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Nasrollahi, Sadaf & Kazemi, Aliyeh & Jahangir, Mohammad-Hossein & Aryaee, Sara, 2023. "Selecting suitable wave energy technology for sustainable development, an MCDM approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 756-772.
    4. Hezam, Ibrahim M. & Ali, Ahmed M. & Sallam, Karam & Hameed, Ibrahim A. & Abdel-Basset, Mohamed, 2024. "An efficient decision-making model for evaluating irrigation systems under uncertainty: Toward integrated approaches to sustainability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    5. Kasin Ransikarbum & Wattana Chanthakhot & Tony Glimm & Jettarat Janmontree, 2023. "Evaluation of Sourcing Decision for Hydrogen Supply Chain Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Samriddhya Ray Chowdhury & Srinjoy Chatterjee & Shankar Chakraborty, 2024. "Optimization of grinding processes using multi-criteria decision making methods in intuitionistic fuzzy environment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 61(2), pages 709-740, June.
    7. Víctor Blanco & Román Salmerón & Samuel Gómez-Haro, 2018. "A Multicriteria Selection System Based on Player Performance: Case Study—The Spanish ACB Basketball League," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1029-1046, December.
    8. Juan Carlos Osorio-Aravena & Marina Frolova & Julio Terrados-Cepeda & Emilio Muñoz-Cerón, 2020. "Spatial Energy Planning: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    9. repec:eco:journ2:2017-04-12 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek, 2020. "Selection of the Best Method for Underpinning Foundations Using the PROMETHEE II Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-10, July.
    11. Sandra, Michael & Narayanamoorthy, Samayan & Ferrara, Massimiliano & Innab, Nisreen & Ahmadian, Ali & Kang, Daekook, 2024. "A novel decision support system for the appraisal and selection of green warehouses," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. da Cunha, Richard Alex & Rangel, Luís Alberto Duncan & Rudolf, Christian A. & Santos, Luiza dos, 2022. "A decision support approach employing the PROMETHEE method and risk factors for critical supply assessment in large-scale projects," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    13. Sebastian Fredershausen & Henrik Lechte & Mathias Willnat & Tobias Witt & Christine Harnischmacher & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Matthias Klumpp & Lutz Kolbe, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of Hydrogen Supply Chains: A Structured Literature Review Regarding Sustainability Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Long, Yilu & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2022. "Renewable energy source technology selection considering the empathetic preferences of experts in a cognitive fuzzy social participatory allocation network," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Liang Li & Yanwu Liu & Yan Tu & Xiaoyang Zhou & Benjamin Lev, 2022. "A Novel Group TODIM Method Based on Multi-Granularity Proportional Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Water Resources Risk Evaluation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 913-944, October.
    16. Cavallaro, Fausto & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Streimikiene, Dalia & Mardani, Abbas, 2019. "Assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) technologies based on a modified intuitionistic fuzzy topsis and trigonometric entropy weights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 258-270.
    17. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Ke, Yiming & Chen, Kaifeng & Sun, Xiaokun, 2018. "An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria framework for large-scale rooftop PV project portfolio selection: Case study in Zhejiang, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 295-309.
    18. Peide Liu & Yumei Wang, 2019. "Intuitionistic Fuzzy Interaction Hamy Mean Operators and Their Application to Multi-attribute Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 197-232, February.
    19. Martin Kügemann & Heracles Polatidis, 2022. "Methodological Framework to Select Evaluation Criteria for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Road Transportation Fuels and Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    20. Hottenroth, H. & Sutardhio, C. & Weidlich, A. & Tietze, I. & Simon, S. & Hauser, W. & Naegler, T. & Becker, L. & Buchgeister, J. & Junne, T. & Lehr, U. & Scheel, O. & Schmidt-Scheele, R. & Ulrich, P. , 2022. "Beyond climate change. Multi-attribute decision making for a sustainability assessment of energy system transformation pathways," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    21. Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Friedrich Chasin & Milad Mirbabaie & Dennis M. Riehle & Christine Harnischmacher, 2022. "Review of Design-Oriented Green Information Systems Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-33, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:19:p:4904-:d:1489859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.