IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4226-d1463052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Biodiesel on the Performance and Gas Emissions of Farm Tractors’ Engines: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsen Akbari

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah 6714414971, Iran)

  • Homeyra Piri

    (Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Renzi

    (Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy)

  • Marco Bietresato

    (Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
    Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences (DI4A), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy)

Abstract

The need for the decarbonization of heavy-duty vehicles requires a deep understanding about the effects of biofuels, which represent a viable pathway to cut the emissions in the hard-to-abate sectors, like agricultural tractors. A novel meta-analysis approach can help to thoroughly investigate the effects of biodiesel blends on farm tractor engines in terms of performance and emissions. Studies were identified using the main keywords related to internal combustion engines in prominent scientific databases. Standardized mean differences were calculated for each study to evaluate engine performance and gas emissions. Mixed-effects regression models were developed to investigate performance and environmental pollution changes over different biodiesel blending ratios, biodiesel sources, and engine types. The analysis revealed significant effects of biodiesel blending ratio on decreasing torque [−13.0%, CI 95% (6.7%–19.3%); I 2 = 97.67; p = 0.000; Q = 129.94], engine power [−15.0%, CI 95% (10.0–20.0%); I 2 = 54.82; p = 0.000; Q = 101.81], CO 2 emissions [−24.1%(15.0–32.0%); I 2 = 0.198; p = 0.000; Q = 20.04], and CO emissions [−17.5%, CI 95% (16.0–18.0%); I 2 = 98.62; p = 0.000; Q = 97.69], while increasing specific fuel consumption [+5.2%, CI 95% (1.0–9.0%); I 2 = 95.94; p = 0.000; Q = 129.74] and NO emissions [+11.0%, CI 95% (6.0–15.0%); I 2 = 98.51; p = 0.000; Q = 157.56]. The same analysis did not show any influence of the sources of biodiesel and the engine type. Finally, meta-regression found a significant positive association between increasing ratios of biodiesels and decreasing torque, engine power, CO and CO 2 emissions, and increasing fuel consumption and NO emissions in terms of linear equations. Although through these equations it is not possible to individuate an optimal range of blending ratios able to lower the emissions and not affect the engine parameters, the range from 9.1% to 13.0% of biodiesel is a good tradeoff. Within it, the only decrease in engine performance is in charge of the power, however contained within 4%, while CO and CO 2 emissions are reduced (respectively by 0.0%/−2.8% and −3.6%/−6.0%) without using any specific pollutant abatement systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsen Akbari & Homeyra Piri & Massimiliano Renzi & Marco Bietresato, 2024. "The Effects of Biodiesel on the Performance and Gas Emissions of Farm Tractors’ Engines: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4226-:d:1463052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thonemann, Nils, 2020. "Environmental impacts of CO2-based chemical production: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Agata Jaroń & Anna Borucka & Rafał Parczewski, 2022. "Analysis of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Value of CO 2 Emissions from Electricity Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Zhang, Xue & Li, Lei & Su, Yuliang & Da, Qi'an & Fu, Jingang & Wang, Rujun & Chen, Fangfang, 2023. "Microfluidic investigation on asphaltene interfaces attempts to carbon sequestration and leakage: Oil-CO2 phase interaction characteristics at ultrahigh temperature and pressure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    4. Eleonora Bargiacchi & Nils Thonemann & Jutta Geldermann & Marco Antonelli & Umberto Desideri, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Synthetic Natural Gas Production from Different CO 2 Sources: A Cradle-to-Gate Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Lv, Zongze & Du, Hong & Xu, Shaojun & Deng, Tao & Ruan, Jiaqi & Qin, Changlei, 2024. "Techno-economic analysis on CO2 mitigation by integrated carbon capture and methanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    6. Kang, Dongseong & Byun, Jaewon & Han, Jee-hoon, 2023. "Environmental impact analysis of steelmaking off-gases on methanol production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Muhammad Nawaz & Humbul Suleman & Abdulhalim Shah Maulud, 2022. "Carbon Capture and Utilization: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2007–2021," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Ravikumar, Dwarakanath & Keoleian, Gregory & Miller, Shelie, 2020. "The environmental opportunity cost of using renewable energy for carbon capture and utilization for methanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    9. Czuma, Natalia & Samojeden, Bogdan & Zarębska, Katarzyna & Motak, Monika & Da Costa, Patrick, 2022. "Modified fly ash, a waste material from the energy industry, as a catalyst for the CO2 reduction to methane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4226-:d:1463052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.