IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i12p2800-d1410607.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Bio-Oil Collected Using an Electrostatic Precipitator from the Pyrolysis of Douglas Fir, Eucalyptus, and Poplar Biomass

Author

Listed:
  • Manish Sakhakarmy

    (Biosystems Engineering Department, Auburn University, 200 Corley Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

  • Ayden Kemp

    (Biosystems Engineering Department, Auburn University, 200 Corley Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

  • Bijoy Biswas

    (Biosystems Engineering Department, Auburn University, 200 Corley Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

  • Sagar Kafle

    (Biosystems Engineering Department, Auburn University, 200 Corley Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

  • Sushil Adhikari

    (Biosystems Engineering Department, Auburn University, 200 Corley Building, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
    Center for Bioenergy and Bioproducts, Auburn University, 519 Devall Drive, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

Abstract

The conversion of biomass into bio-oil through the pyrolysis process offers numerous benefits, such as bio-fuel and bio-resin synthesis. However, for bio-oil usage for any application, understanding its composition is vital. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of different commonly available woody biomass (Douglas fir, eucalyptus, and poplar) on bio-oil composition. The bio-oil was produced through fast pyrolysis at 500 °C in a fluidized bed reactor and collected using an electrostatic precipitator. The chemical composition was analyzed using gas chromatography–mass spectroscopy, and the hydroxyl groups were quantified using phosphorous-31 nuclear magnetic resonance. The poplar bio-oil had the most significant proportion (67 area%) of lignin-derived compounds and the highest OH concentration (6 mmol g −1 ). However, the proportion of carbohydrate-derived compounds was the largest (44 area %) in bio-oil produced from Douglas fir. Based on the OH concentration, poplar would be the most suitable feedstock for resin synthesis among the three feedstocks tested.

Suggested Citation

  • Manish Sakhakarmy & Ayden Kemp & Bijoy Biswas & Sagar Kafle & Sushil Adhikari, 2024. "A Comparative Analysis of Bio-Oil Collected Using an Electrostatic Precipitator from the Pyrolysis of Douglas Fir, Eucalyptus, and Poplar Biomass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2800-:d:1410607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2800/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/12/2800/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barreto, Raul A., 2018. "Fossil fuels, alternative energy and economic growth," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 196-220.
    2. Yang, Lan & Wang, Xue-Chao & Dai, Min & Chen, Bin & Qiao, Yuanbo & Deng, Huijing & Zhang, Dingfan & Zhang, Yizhe & Villas Bôas de Almeida, Cecília Maria & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & W, 2021. "Shifting from fossil-based economy to bio-based economy: Status quo, challenges, and prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Dina Aboelela & Habibatallah Saleh & Attia M. Attia & Yasser Elhenawy & Thokozani Majozi & Mohamed Bassyouni, 2023. "Recent Advances in Biomass Pyrolysis Processes for Bioenergy Production: Optimization of Operating Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joanicjusz Nazarko & Ewa Chodakowska & Łukasz Nazarko, 2022. "Evaluating the Transition of the European Union Member States towards a Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Xu, Jiaqi & Zhao, Jingfeng & Liu, Wen, 2023. "A comparative study of renewable and fossil fuels energy impacts on green development in Asian countries with divergent income inequality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    3. Sandu, Suwin & Yang, Muyi & Phoumin, Han & Aghdam, Reza Fathollahzadeh & Shi, Xunpeng, 2021. "Assessment of accessible, clean and efficient energy systems: A statistical analysis of composite energy performance indices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    4. Chen, Jiandong & Xie, Qiaoli & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Song, Malin & Li, Li, 2022. "Impact of bilateral trade on fossil energy consumption in BRICS: An extended decomposition analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Sergey O. Chikunov & Olga N. Gutsunuk & Marina I. Ivleva & Isabella D. Elyakova & Irina V. Nikolaeva & Maksim S. Maramygin, 2018. "Improving the economic performance of Russia s energy system based on the development of alternative energy sources," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(6), pages 382-391.
    6. Huang, Leping & Zhang, Kuo & Wang, Jingxin & Zhu, Yingfu, 2023. "Examining the interplay of green bonds and fossil fuel markets: The influence of investor sentiments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    7. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "Wind Energy Market in Poland in the Background of the Baltic Sea Bordering Countries in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Daniela Nicoleta Sahlian & Adriana Florina Popa & Ștefania Amalia Nicoară & Corina Graziella Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Examining the Causality between Integrated Reporting and Stock Market Capitalization. The Case of the European Renewable Energy Equipment and Services Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Marcin Landrat & Mamo Abawalo & Krzysztof Pikoń & Paulos Asefa Fufa & Semira Seyid, 2024. "Assessing the Potential of Teff Husk for Biochar Production through Slow Pyrolysis: Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on Biochar Yield," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Nyambuu, Unurjargal & Semmler, Willi, 2020. "Climate change and the transition to a low carbon economy – Carbon targets and the carbon budget," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 367-376.
    11. Paolo Trucillo & Alessandro Erto, 2023. "Sustainability Indicators for Materials and Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Ting Lei & Ping Xie, 2024. "Fostering Enterprise Innovation: The Impact of China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 10412-10441, September.
    13. Ma, Xuewen & Zhang, Dongming, 2023. "Digitalization of the economy for fossil fuels efficiency and carbon neutrality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    14. He, Ruofan & Wan, Panbing & Yang, Mian, 2024. "The resource curse in energy-rich regions: Evidence from China's ultra-high voltage transmission," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    15. Chen, Jiandong & Gao, Ming & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2021. "An improved decomposition approach toward energy rebound effects in China: Review since 1992," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Erol, Derviş, 2024. "An experimental comparative study of the effects on the engine performance of using three different motion mechanisms in a beta-configuration Stirling engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    17. Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Yoshino, Naoyuki & Sarker, Tapan, 2019. "Russian Federation–East Asia Liquefied Natural Gas Trade Patterns and Regional Energy Security," ADBI Working Papers 965, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    18. Grzegorz Maj & Kamil Buczyński & Kamila E. Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan, 2024. "Evaluation of Growth and Energy Parameters of One-Year-Old Raspberry Shoots, Depending on the Variety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-12, June.
    19. Agata Borowik & Jadwiga Wyszkowska & Magdalena Zaborowska & Jan Kucharski, 2024. "Energy Quality of Corn Biomass from Gasoline-Contaminated Soils Remediated with Sorbents," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Umberto Di Matteo & Sofia Agostinelli, 2022. "Big Data Analysis for Optimising the Decision-Making Process in Sustainable Energy Action Plans: A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach Applied to Sicilian Regional Recovery and Resilience Plans," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:12:p:2800-:d:1410607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.