IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i11p2751-d1408757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Formulation Model to Compute the Life Cycle Environmental Impact of NiZn Batteries from Cradle to Grave

Author

Listed:
  • Ashwani Kumar Malviya

    (AITEC, Research and Innovation Department, Parque Tecnológico, C/Charles Robert Darwin, 20, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain)

  • Mehdi Zarehparast Malekzadeh

    (AITEC, Research and Innovation Department, Parque Tecnológico, C/Charles Robert Darwin, 20, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain)

  • Jinping Li

    (Optima Technology GmbH, Einsteinstraße 59, 89077 Ulm, Germany)

  • Boyang Li

    (Optima Technology GmbH, Einsteinstraße 59, 89077 Ulm, Germany)

  • Francisco Enrique Santarremigia

    (AITEC, Research and Innovation Department, Parque Tecnológico, C/Charles Robert Darwin, 20, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain)

  • Gemma Dolores Molero

    (AITEC, Research and Innovation Department, Parque Tecnológico, C/Charles Robert Darwin, 20, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain)

  • Ignacio Villalba Sanchis

    (Transport and Territory Research Institute, School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Víctor Yepes

    (Institute of Concrete Science and Technology (ICITECH), School of Civil Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera, s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the environmental impacts (EI) produced by novel nickel-zinc battery (RNZB) technology, which is a promising alternative for energy storage applications. The paper develops mathematical models for estimating the life cycle environmental impacts of RNZB from cradle to grave, based on an extensive literature review and the ISO standards for life cycle costing and life cycle analysis. The paper uses the ReCiPe 2016 method of life cycle analysis (LCA) to calculate the EI of RNZB in terms of eighteen Midpoint impact categories and three Endpoint impact categories: damage to human health, damage to ecosystem diversity, and damage to resource availability. The paper also compares the EI of RNZB with those of other battery technologies, such as lead-acid and lithium-ion LFP and NMC. The paper applies the models and compares results with those provided by the software openLCA (version 1.11.0), showing its reliability and concluding that NiZn batteries contribute approximately 14 MJ for CED and 0.82 kg CO 2 eq. for global warming per kWh of released energy, placing them between lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries. This study suggests that NiZn battery technology could benefit from using more renewable energy in end-use applications and adopting green recovery technology to reduce environmental impact. Further developments can use these models as objective functions for heuristic optimisation of the EI in the life cycle of RNZB.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashwani Kumar Malviya & Mehdi Zarehparast Malekzadeh & Jinping Li & Boyang Li & Francisco Enrique Santarremigia & Gemma Dolores Molero & Ignacio Villalba Sanchis & Víctor Yepes, 2024. "A Formulation Model to Compute the Life Cycle Environmental Impact of NiZn Batteries from Cradle to Grave," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-41, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2751-:d:1408757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/11/2751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schill, Wolf-Peter, 2020. "Electricity Storage and the Renewable Energy Transition," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 4(10), pages 2059-2064.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghosh, Sourav & Yadav, Sarita & Devi, Ambika & Thomas, Tiju, 2022. "Techno-economic understanding of Indian energy-storage market: A perspective on green materials-based supercapacitor technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Schauf, Magnus & Schwenen, Sebastian, 2023. "System price dynamics for battery storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Jacques, Pierre & Delannoy, Louis & Andrieu, Baptiste & Yilmaz, Devrim & Jeanmart, Hervé & Godin, Antoine, 2023. "Assessing the economic consequences of an energy transition through a biophysical stock-flow consistent model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Adeline Gu'eret & Wolf-Peter Schill & Carlos Gaete-Morales, 2024. "Impacts of electric carsharing on a power sector with variable renewables," Papers 2402.19380, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    5. Stöckl, Fabian & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander, 2021. "Optimal supply chains and power sector benefits of green hydrogen," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11.
    6. López Prol, Javier & Zilberman, David, 2023. "No alarms and no surprises: Dynamics of renewable energy curtailment in California," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. van Ouwerkerk, Jonas & Gils, Hans Christian & Gardian, Hedda & Kittel, Martin & Schill, Wolf-Peter & Zerrahn, Alexander & Murmann, Alexander & Launer, Jann & Torralba-Díaz, Laura & Bußar, Christian, 2022. "Impacts of power sector model features on optimal capacity expansion: A comparative study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Dogan, Eyup & Chishti, Muhammad Zubair & Karimi Alavijeh, Nooshin & Tzeremes, Panayiotis, 2022. "The roles of technology and Kyoto Protocol in energy transition towards COP26 targets: Evidence from the novel GMM-PVAR approach for G-7 countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Franz Harke & Philipp Otto, 2023. "Solar Self-Sufficient Households as a Driving Factor for Sustainability Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Javier L'opez Prol & Karl W. Steininger & Keith Williges & Wolf D. Grossmann & Iris Grossmann, 2022. "Potential gains of long-distance trade in electricity," Papers 2205.01436, arXiv.org.
    11. Sadik-Zada, Elkhan Richard & Gatto, Andrea & Weißnicht, Yannic, 2024. "Back to the future: Revisiting the perspectives on nuclear fusion and juxtaposition to existing energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    12. Ruhnau, Oliver, 2020. "Market-based renewables: How flexible hydrogen electrolyzers stabilize wind and solar market values," EconStor Preprints 227075, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    13. Göke, Leonard & Kendziorski, Mario & Kemfert, Claudia & Hirschhausen, Christian von, 2022. "Accounting for spatiality of renewables and storage in transmission planning," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    14. Thimet, P.J. & Mavromatidis, G., 2022. "Review of model-based electricity system transition scenarios: An analysis for Switzerland, Germany, France, and Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Marco G. Pinheiro & Sara C. Madeira & Alexandre P. Francisco, 2022. "Shapelets to Classify Energy Demand Time Series," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Martin Kittel & Wolf-Peter Schill, 2024. "Measuring the Dunkelflaute: How (not) to analyze variable renewable energy shortage," Papers 2402.06758, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    17. Parra, David & Mauger, Romain, 2022. "A new dawn for energy storage: An interdisciplinary legal and techno-economic analysis of the new EU legal framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. Hasan Huseyin Coban, 2023. "Hydropower Planning in Combination with Batteries and Solar Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    19. Elkadeem, Mohamed R. & Younes, Ali & Mazzeo, Domenico & Jurasz, Jakub & Elia Campana, Pietro & Sharshir, Swellam W. & Alaam, Mohamed A., 2022. "Geospatial-assisted multi-criterion analysis of solar and wind power geographical-technical-economic potential assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    20. Jun Zhao & Xiaonan Wang & Jinsheng Chu, 2022. "The Strategies for Increasing Grid-Integrated Share of Renewable Energy with Energy Storage and Existing Coal Fired Power Generation in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:11:p:2751-:d:1408757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.