IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i3p1118-d1041304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technological Innovation Efficiency of Listed Carbon Capture Companies in China: Based on the Dual Dimensions of Legal Policy and Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaofeng Xu

    (International School of Law and Finance, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
    Legal Research Center of Optimizing Doing Business Environment, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
    Center of Green Finance and Energy Development, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

  • Dongdong He

    (International School of Law and Finance, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
    Legal Research Center of Optimizing Doing Business Environment, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

  • Tao Wang

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
    UNEP-Tongji Institute of Environment for Sustainable Development, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Xiangyu Chen

    (International School of Law and Finance, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China
    Legal Research Center of Optimizing Doing Business Environment, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

  • Yichen Zhou

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
    TUV Rheinland (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200072, China)

Abstract

To achieve carbon neutrality and improve emission reduction efficiency, capturing carbon dioxide from the air on a large scale and promoting the application and innovation of carbon capture technology (CCUS) are the most important goals. This study undertakes an annual and comprehensive evaluation of the policy and the technological innovation efficiency (TIE) of 10 listed companies in China using the DEA model and the Malmquist index analysis method. The number of relevant laws and policies is significant, but they are not well coordinated. The static evaluation results indicate that the complete factor production rate is low, generally lower than 0.9, and the technical innovation efficiency is weak, mainly because of technological backwardness. The dynamic evaluation results indicate that the changes in total factor productivity (TFP) each year are primarily affected by changes in technological progress. This suggests that most domestic enterprises are still exploring technological innovation (TI) and operational business models. Finally, this study proposes measures to improve the TIE of carbon capture technology enterprises in China, including giving full play to the role of the government, expanding effective investment, and improving innovational ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaofeng Xu & Dongdong He & Tao Wang & Xiangyu Chen & Yichen Zhou, 2023. "Technological Innovation Efficiency of Listed Carbon Capture Companies in China: Based on the Dual Dimensions of Legal Policy and Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1118-:d:1041304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/3/1118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wienchol, Paulina & Szlęk, Andrzej & Ditaranto, Mario, 2020. "Waste-to-energy technology integrated with carbon capture – Challenges and opportunities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    3. Shearmur, Richard & Doloreux, David & Laperrière, Anika, 2015. "Is the degree of internationalization associated with the use of knowledge intensive services or with innovation?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 457-465.
    4. Keeeun Lee & Deaun Go & Inchae Park & Byungun Yoon, 2017. "Exploring Suitable Technology for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Based on a Hidden Markov Model Using Patent Information and Value Chain Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2011. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 803-842, September.
    6. Liyuan Zhang & Xiang Ma & Young-Seok Ock & Lingli Qing, 2022. "Research on Regional Differences and Influencing Factors of Chinese Industrial Green Technology Innovation Efficiency Based on Dagum Gini Coefficient Decomposition," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    7. Wong, Christina W.Y. & Lai, Kee-hung & Shang, Kuo-Chung & Lu, Chin-Shan & Leung, T.K.P., 2012. "Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 283-294.
    8. Hong, Jin & Feng, Bing & Wu, Yanrui & Wang, Liangbing, 2016. "Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 4-13.
    9. Yanran Liu & Lei Tang & Guangfu Liu, 2022. "Carbon Dioxide Emissions Reduction through Technological Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Provinces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Benlu Hai & Ximing Yin & Jie Xiong & Jin Chen, 2022. "Could more innovation output bring better financial performance? The role of financial constraints," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Wu, Jie & Wang, Chengqi & Hong, Junjie & Piperopoulos, Panagiotis & Zhuo, Shuaihe, 2016. "Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: The role of host-country institutional development," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 251-263.
    12. Ute Laermann-Nguyen & Martin Backfisch, 2021. "Innovation crisis in the pharmaceutical industry? A survey," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(12), pages 1-37, December.
    13. Chenggang Wang, 2022. "Green Technology Innovation, Energy Consumption Structure and Sustainable Improvement of Enterprise Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Hyoung Seok Lee & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Environmental Performance Evaluation of the Korean Manufacturing Industry Based on Sequential DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Xing Gao & Keyu Zhai, 2018. "Performance Evaluation on Intellectual Property Rights Policy System of the Renewable Energy in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    16. Paweł Madejski & Karolina Chmiel & Navaneethan Subramanian & Tomasz Kuś, 2022. "Methods and Techniques for CO 2 Capture: Review of Potential Solutions and Applications in Modern Energy Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Yingyuan Guo & Xingneng Xia & Sheng Zhang & Danping Zhang, 2018. "Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhangsheng Liu & Liuqingqing Yang & Liqin Fan, 2021. "Induced Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation: Evidence from the Increasing-Block Pricing Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Jintao Zhang & Zhen Yang & Li Meng & Lu Han, 2022. "Environmental regulations and enterprises innovation performance: the role of R&D investments and political connections," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 4088-4109, March.
    3. Shi Yin & Nan Zhang & Baizhou Li, 2020. "Improving the Effectiveness of Multi-Agent Cooperation for Green Manufacturing in China: A Theoretical Framework to Measure the Performance of Green Technology Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-27, May.
    4. Li Fang & Zhang Sheng, 2021. "Policy orientation, knowledge dynamic ability and green innovation: A mediation model based on China provincial panel data," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 39(1), pages 9-37.
    5. Xinpeng Xing & Tiansen Liu & Jianhua Wang & Lin Shen & Yue Zhu, 2019. "Environmental Regulation, Environmental Commitment, Sustainability Exploration/Exploitation Innovation, and Firm Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Xinpeng Xing & Tiansen Liu & Lin Shen & Jianhua Wang, 2020. "Linking Environmental Regulation and Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Dynamic Capability and Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Huang, Jingchang & Zhao, Jing & Cao, June, 2021. "Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment—evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 154-174.
    8. Xiufeng Zhang & Yan Li & Ke Shi & Yanchao Feng, 2022. "How Do Environmental Technology Standards Affect the Green Transformation? New Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Nelson, Kelly P. & Parton, Lee C. & Brown, Zachary S., 2022. "Biofuels policy and innovation impacts: Evidence from biofuels and agricultural patent indicators," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Yanli Ji & Jie Xue & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Industrial Green Technology Progress? Empirical Evidence from China with a Heterogeneity Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    12. Liu, Cenjie & Fang, Jiayu & Xie, Rui, 2021. "Energy policy and corporate financial performance: Evidence from China's 11th five-year plan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    13. Pedro Naso & Yi Huang Author Name: Tim Swanson, 2017. "The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity," CIES Research Paper series 53-2017, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    14. Chen, Feng & Wu, Bin & Lou, Wenqian, 2021. "An evolutionary analysis on the effect of government policies on green R & D of photovoltaic industry diffusion in complex network," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Croce, Annalisa & Toschi, Laura & Ughetto, Elisa & Zanni, Sara, 2024. "Cleantech and policy framework in Europe: A machine learning approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    16. Yang, Mian & Hong, Yili & Yang, Fuxia, 2022. "The effects of Mandatory Energy Efficiency Policy on resource allocation efficiency: Evidence from Chinese industrial sector," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 513-524.
    17. Nusrate Aziz & Belayet Hossain & Laura Lamb, 2022. "Does green policy pay dividends?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(2), pages 147-172, April.
    18. Junjun Tang & Xing Zhao, 2023. "Does the new digital infrastructure improve total factor productivity?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 895-916, October.
    19. Hongshan Ai & Shenglan Hu & Ke Li & Shuai Shao, 2020. "Environmental regulation, total factor productivity, and enterprise duration: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2284-2296, September.
    20. Shuai Shao & Zhigao Hu & Jianhua Cao & Lili Yang & Dabo Guan, 2020. "Environmental Regulation and Enterprise Innovation: A Review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1465-1478, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:3:p:1118-:d:1041304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.