IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p8031-d1298841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Luminance Contrast Values at Illuminated Pedestrian Crossings in Urban Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Tomczuk

    (Faculty of Transport, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Anna Wytrykowska

    (Faculty of Engineering, Helena Chodkowska University of Technology and Economics, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Marcin Chrzanowicz

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Lighting pedestrian crossings play an important role in ensuring the safety of pedestrians on the road, especially at night or in conditions of reduced visibility. Currently functioning normative and formal requirements, which are the basis for the design of lighting for pedestrian crossings, are described by criteria of lighting intensity. Each of the existing solutions operates in an urban environment, and at the stage of design and operation, the obtained values of the produced luminance contrast of the pedestrian silhouette and its background are not known. The main purpose of the article is to compare, based on luminance parameters, the three lighting solutions used at pedestrian crossings. This article presents and describes the method of determining the luminance contrast based on luminance measurements of the pedestrian silhouette and its background. Detailed results of measurements of luminance parameters at selected pedestrian crossings are presented. An analysis of the results was made with a breakdown of typical lighting solutions used in urban conditions. The differences between standard lighting were discussed, as well as supplementary and dedicated lighting. The obtained ranges of luminance contrast levels occurring in urban conditions for individual solutions were determined. The energy indicator for each solution was determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Tomczuk & Anna Wytrykowska & Marcin Chrzanowicz, 2023. "Analysis of Luminance Contrast Values at Illuminated Pedestrian Crossings in Urban Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8031-:d:1298841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8031/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8031/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajaram Bhagavathula & Ronald B. Gibbons, 2023. "Lighting Strategies to Increase Nighttime Pedestrian Visibility at Midblock Crosswalks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Retting, R.A. & Ferguson, S.A. & McCartt, A.T., 2003. "A Review of Evidence-Based Traffic Engineering Measures Designed to Reduce Pedestrian-Motor Vehicle Crashes," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1456-1463.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Courtney Coughenour & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Alexander Paz, 2019. "Analysis of Self-Reported Walking for Transit in a Sprawling Urban Metropolitan Area in the Western U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Sheila Clark & Courtney Coughenour & Kelly Bumgarner & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Chantel Reynolds & James Abelar, 2019. "The Impact of Pedestrian Crossing Flags on Driver Yielding Behavior in Las Vegas, NV," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-8, August.
    3. Moien A. B. Khan & Michal Grivna & Javaid Nauman & Elpidoforos S. Soteriades & Arif Alper Cevik & Muhammad Jawad Hashim & Romona Govender & Salma Rashid Al Azeezi, 2020. "Global Incidence and Mortality Patterns of Pedestrian Road Traffic Injuries by Sociodemographic Index, with Forecasting: Findings from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2017 St," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Shu-Hui Peng & Chun-Ying Huang & Shiun-Yuan Hsu & Li-Hui Yang & Ching-Hua Hsieh, 2018. "The Preschool-Aged and School-Aged Children Present Different Odds of Mortality than Adults in Southern Taiwan: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-11, April.
    5. Tanja Congiu & Giovanni Sotgiu & Paolo Castiglia & Antonio Azara & Andrea Piana & Laura Saderi & Marco Dettori, 2019. "Built Environment Features and Pedestrian Accidents: An Italian Retrospective Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Chia-Yuan Yu, 2015. "Built Environmental Designs in Promoting Pedestrian Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Bones, Emma J. & Barrella, Elise M. & Amekudzi, Adjo A., 2013. "Implementation of evidence-based design approaches in transportation decision making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 317-328.
    8. Yiannakoulias, Nikolaos & Scott, Darren M., 2013. "The effects of local and non-local traffic on child pedestrian safety: A spatial displacement of risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 96-104.
    9. Trina Robinson & Andrea Nathan & Kevin Murray & Hayley Christian, 2022. "Parents’ Perceptions of the Neighbourhood Built Environment Are Associated with the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8031-:d:1298841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.