IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i22p7548-d1278913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Co-Gasification Methods for Hydrogen Production from Biomass and Plastic Wastes

Author

Listed:
  • Jonah M. Williams

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

  • A. C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas

    (Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
    Earth Engineering Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA)

Abstract

In recent decades, economic development and population growth has been accompanied by the generation of billions of tonnes of solid residues or municipal “wastes”, a substantial portion of which is composed of plastics and biomass materials. Combustion-based waste-to-energy is a viable and mature method of extracting calorific value from these end-of-life post-recyclable materials that are otherwise landfilled. However, alternative thermochemical methods, such as gasification, are becoming attractive due to the ability to synthesize chemical precursors for supply chain recirculation. Due to the infancy of gasification technology deployment, especially in the context of anthropogenic CO 2 emission reduction, additional systems engineering studies are necessary. Herein, we conduct an attributional life cycle analysis to elucidate the syngas production and environmental impacts of advanced thermochemical gasification methods for the treatment of biomass and plastic wastes obtained from municipal solid wastes, using a comprehensive thermodynamic process model constructed in AspenTech. Feedstock composition, process parameters, and gasification methods are varied to study the effects on syngas quality, yield, power generation potential, and overall greenhouse gas emissions. Steam-based gasification presents up to 38% reductions in CO 2 emissions when compared to conventional thermochemical methods. Using gasifier-active materials, such as metal hydroxides, can also further reduce CO 2 emissions, and realizes a capture load of 1.75 tonnes of CO 2 per tonne of plastic/stover feedstock. This design alteration has implications for reductions in CAPEX due to the mode of CO 2 capture utilized (e.g., solid sorbent vs. liquid SELEXOL). The use of renewable energy to provide a method to generate steam for this process could make the environmental impact of such MSW gasification processes lower by between 60–75% tonnes of CO 2 per tonne of H 2 . Overall, these results can be used to inform the guidance of advanced waste gasification methods as a low-carbon transition towards a circular economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonah M. Williams & A. C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas, 2023. "Assessment of Co-Gasification Methods for Hydrogen Production from Biomass and Plastic Wastes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7548-:d:1278913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7548/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/22/7548/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang Zhang & Woo-Jae Kim & Ah-Hyung Alissa Park, 2020. "Alkaline thermal treatment of seaweed for high-purity hydrogen production with carbon capture and storage potential," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kejie Wang & Ge Kong & Guanyu Zhang & Xin Zhang & Lujia Han & Xuesong Zhang, 2022. "Steam Gasification of Torrefied/Carbonized Wheat Straw for H 2 -Enriched Syngas Production and Tar Reduction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:22:p:7548-:d:1278913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.