IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i21p7335-d1270103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rank-Based Assessment of Grid-Connected Rooftop Solar Panel Deployments Considering Scenarios for a Postponed Installation

Author

Listed:
  • Nima Monghasemi

    (School of Business, Society, and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 72123 Västerås, Sweden)

  • Amir Vadiee

    (School of Business, Society, and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 72123 Västerås, Sweden)

  • Konstantinos Kyprianidis

    (School of Business, Society, and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 72123 Västerås, Sweden)

  • Elaheh Jalilzadehazhari

    (Division of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, 75104 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

Installing solar photovoltaic panels on building rooftops can help property managers generate renewable energy and reduce electricity costs. However, the existence of multiple efficiency indicators and ambiguity in interpreting these metrics limits the comparison of the performance of individual installation projects. This paper presents a methodology using data envelopment analysis to evaluate suitable candidates for rooftop solar panel installation. This approach integrates rooftop area, solar irradiation, temperature, costs, energy yield, and revenue to evaluate the relative efficiency of each building. To demonstrate the methodology, it was applied to rank 22 residential buildings, revealing the top performers for installation in 2022. The approach was subsequently adapted to assess potential outcomes under deferred implementation up to 2030, encompassing a diverse range of climate and pricing scenarios. Five installations were found to be optimal irrespective of the future scenarios. In addition, a super-efficiency approach was applied to overcome the low level of discrimination among the possible installations and to rank each individual unit uniquely. The analysis is designed to guide property owners in identifying favorable solar photovoltaic investments within their portfolios under changing conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nima Monghasemi & Amir Vadiee & Konstantinos Kyprianidis & Elaheh Jalilzadehazhari, 2023. "Rank-Based Assessment of Grid-Connected Rooftop Solar Panel Deployments Considering Scenarios for a Postponed Installation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:21:p:7335-:d:1270103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/21/7335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/21/7335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarawut Ninsawat & Mohammad Dalower Hossain, 2016. "Identifying Potential Area and Financial Prospects of Rooftop Solar Photovoltaics (PV)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Per Andersen & Niels Christian Petersen, 1993. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1261-1264, October.
    3. Bankel, Amanda & Mignon, Ingrid, 2022. "Solar business models from a firm perspective – an empirical study of the Swedish market," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Paolo Bertoldi & Marina Economidou & Valentina Palermo & Benigna Boza‐Kiss & Valeria Todeschi, 2021. "How to finance energy renovation of residential buildings: Review of current and emerging financing instruments in the EU," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), January.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif, 2016. "Energy use and overheating risk of Swedish multi-storey residential buildings under different climate scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 534-548.
    7. Raimund M. Kovacevic, 2019. "Valuation and pricing of electricity delivery contracts: the producer’s view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 421-460, April.
    8. Lygnerud, Kristina & Peltola-Ojala, Päivi, 2010. "Factors impacting district heating companies' decision to provide small house customers with heat," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 185-190, January.
    9. W D Cook & L Liang & Y Zha & J Zhu, 2009. "A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 276-281, February.
    10. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, April.
    11. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    12. Wang, Derek D. & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2017. "Assessment of large commercial rooftop photovoltaic system installations: Evidence from California," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 45-55.
    13. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2014. "Photovoltaic power stations in Germany and the United States: A comparative study by data envelopment analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 271-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nakamoto, Yuya & Eguchi, Shogo & Takayabu, Hirotaka, 2024. "Efficiency and benchmarks for photovoltaic power generation amid uncertain conditions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Zervopoulos, Panagiotis & Emrouznejad, Ali & Sklavos, Sokratis, 2019. "A Bayesian approach for correcting bias of data envelopment analysis estimators," MPRA Paper 91886, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Cheng, Gang & Zervopoulos, Panagiotis, 2012. "A proxy approach to dealing with the infeasibility problem in super-efficiency data envelopment analysis," MPRA Paper 42064, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Lin, Ruiyue & Liu, Yue, 2019. "Super-efficiency based on the directional distance function in the presence of negative data," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 26-34.
    5. Guo-Ya Gan & Hsuan-Shih Lee, 2021. "Resolving the infeasibility of the super-efficiency DEA based on DDF," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 307(1), pages 139-152, December.
    6. Ghasemi, M.-R. & Ignatius, Joshua & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2014. "A bi-objective weighted model for improving the discrimination power in MCDEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 640-650.
    7. Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza & Ignatius, Joshua & Rezaee, Babak, 2019. "Improving discriminating power in data envelopment models based on deviation variables framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 442-447.
    8. Surakiat PARICHATNON & Kamonthip MAICHUM & Ke-Chung PENG, 2018. "Measuring technical efficiency of Thai rubber production using the three-stage data envelopment analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(5), pages 227-240.
    9. Victoria Wojcik & Harald Dyckhoff & Marcel Clermont, 2019. "Is data envelopment analysis a suitable tool for performance measurement and benchmarking in non-production contexts?," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 559-595, December.
    10. Necmi Kemal Avkiran, 2017. "An illustration of multiple-stakeholder perspective using a survey across Australia, China and Japan," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 93-121, January.
    11. Lee, Hsuan-Shih & Zhu, Joe, 2012. "Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 429-433.
    12. Veiga, Gabriela Lobo & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Frega, José Roberto & Gouvea da Costa, Sérgio Eduardo, 2021. "A DEA-based approach to assess manufacturing performance through operations strategy lenses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Avkiran, Necmi K., 2011. "Association of DEA super-efficiency estimates with financial ratios: Investigating the case for Chinese banks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 323-334, June.
    14. Chen, Yao & Du, Juan & Huo, Jiazhen, 2013. "Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 621-625.
    15. Qiwei Xie & Linda L. Zhang & Haichao Shang & Ali Emrouznejad & Yongjun Li, 2021. "Evaluating performance of super-efficiency models in ranking efficient decision-making units based on Monte Carlo simulations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 305(1), pages 273-323, October.
    16. Wu, Yunna & Ke, Yiming & Zhang, Ting & Liu, Fangtong & Wang, Jing, 2018. "Performance efficiency assessment of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: A three-phase data envelopment analysis model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 599-610.
    17. Baldin, Andrea, 2017. "A DEA approach for selecting a bundle of tickets for performing arts events," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 190-200.
    18. Mohd Chachuli, Fairuz Suzana & Ahmad Ludin, Norasikin & Md Jedi, Muhamad Alias & Hamid, Norul Hisham, 2021. "Transition of renewable energy policies in Malaysia: Benchmarking with data envelopment analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    19. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Chen, Xiaohong, 2023. "Nested frontier-based best practice regulation under asymmetric information in a principal–agent framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 269-285.
    20. Ya Chen & Yongjun Li & Liang Liang & Huaqing Wu, 2019. "An extension on super slacks-based measure DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 101-121, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:21:p:7335-:d:1270103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.