IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i13p5211-d1188427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Geothermal Potential of Selected Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs Based on Geological Modeling and Machine Learning Tools

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Topór

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25 A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Cracow, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Słota-Valim

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25 A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Cracow, Poland)

  • Rafał Kudrewicz

    (PKN Orlen-PGNiG Exploration & Production Division, Kasprzaka 25a, 01-224 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

The study evaluates the geothermal energy potential of two depleted oil and gas reservoirs representing two different lithostratigraphic formations—the carbonate formation of the Visean age from the basement of the Carpathian Flysch and the Rotliegend sandstone formation from the Eastern part of the Foresudetic Monocline, Poland. Advanced modeling techniques were employed to analyze the studied formations’ heat, storage, and transport properties. The obtained results were then used to calculate the heat in place (HIP) and evaluate the recoverable heat (Hrec) for both water and CO 2 as working fluids, considering a geothermal system lifetime of 50 years. The petrophysical parameters and Hrec were subsequently utilized in the generalized c-means (GFCM) clustering analysis, which helped to identify plays with the greatest geothermal potential within the studied formations. The central block emerged as the most promising area for the studied carbonate formation with Hrec values of ~1.12 and 0.26 MW when H 2 O and CO 2 were used as working fluids, respectively. The central block has three wells that can be easily adapted for geothermal production. The area, however, may require permeability enhancement techniques to increase reservoir permeability. Two prospective zones were determined for the analyzed Rotliegend sandstone formation: one in the NW region and the other in the SE region. In the NW region, the estimated Hrec was 23.16 MW and 4.36 MW, while in the SE region, it was 19.76 MW and 3.51 MW, using H 2 O and CO 2 as working fluids, respectively. Both areas have high porosity and permeability, providing good storage and transport properties for the working fluid, and abundant wells that can be configured for multiple injection-production systems. When comparing the efficiency of geothermal systems, the water-driven system in the Visean carbonate formation turned out to be over four times more efficient than the CO 2 -driven one. Furthermore, in the case of the Rotliegend sandstone formation, it was possible to access over five times more heat using water-driven system.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Topór & Małgorzata Słota-Valim & Rafał Kudrewicz, 2023. "Assessing the Geothermal Potential of Selected Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs Based on Geological Modeling and Machine Learning Tools," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:5211-:d:1188427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/5211/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/13/5211/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willems, C.J.L. & M. Nick, H., 2019. "Towards optimisation of geothermal heat recovery: An example from the West Netherlands Basin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 582-593.
    2. Singh, Mrityunjay & Mahmoodpour, Saeed & Ershadnia, Reza & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza & Sass, Ingo, 2023. "Comparative study on heat extraction from Soultz-sous-Forêts geothermal field using supercritical carbon dioxide and water as the working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Daniilidis, Alexandros & Alpsoy, Betül & Herber, Rien, 2017. "Impact of technical and economic uncertainties on the economic performance of a deep geothermal heat system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 805-816.
    4. Aydin, Hakki & Merey, Sukru, 2021. "Potential of geothermal energy production from depleted gas fields: A case study of Dodan Field, Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1076-1088.
    5. Cui, Guodong & Zhang, Liang & Ren, Bo & Enechukwu, Chioma & Liu, Yanmin & Ren, Shaoran, 2016. "Geothermal exploitation from depleted high temperature gas reservoirs via recycling supercritical CO2: Heat mining rate and salt precipitation effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-852.
    6. Cheng, Wen-Long & Li, Tong-Tong & Nian, Yong-Le & Xie, Kun, 2014. "Evaluation of working fluids for geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 238-245.
    7. Moraga, J. & Duzgun, H.S. & Cavur, M. & Soydan, H., 2022. "The Geothermal Artificial Intelligence for geothermal exploration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 134-149.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wiesław Szott & Piotr Ruciński & Piotr Łętkowski & Tadeusz Szpunar & Marcin Majkrzak & Tomasz Siuda & Robert Wojtowicz, 2024. "Modeling of Geothermal Energy Recovery from a Depleted Gas Reservoir: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-27, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yang & Voskov, Denis & Khait, Mark & Saeid, Sanaz & Bruhn, David, 2021. "Influential factors on the development of a low-enthalpy geothermal reservoir: A sensitivity study of a realistic field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 641-651.
    2. Sharma, P. & Al Saedi, A.Q. & Kabir, C.S., 2020. "Geothermal energy extraction with wellbore heat exchanger: Analytical model and parameter evaluation to optimize heat recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Kurnia, Jundika C. & Putra, Zulfan A. & Muraza, Oki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2021. "Numerical evaluation, process design and techno-economic analysis of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil wells in Malaysia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 868-879.
    4. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Wentao Zhao & Yilong Yuan & Tieya Jing & Chenghao Zhong & Shoucheng Wei & Yulong Yin & Deyuan Zhao & Haowei Yuan & Jin Zheng & Shaomin Wang, 2023. "Heat Production Performance from an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Using CO 2 as the Working Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Wang, Yang & Voskov, Denis & Khait, Mark & Bruhn, David, 2020. "An efficient numerical simulator for geothermal simulation: A benchmark study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Galina Chebotareva, 2018. "Methods for the Evaluation of the Competitiveness of Energy Companies," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 190-201.
    8. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    9. Ghasemi, Hadi & Sheu, Elysia & Tizzanini, Alessio & Paci, Marco & Mitsos, Alexander, 2014. "Hybrid solar–geothermal power generation: Optimal retrofitting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 158-170.
    10. Zolfaghari, Seyed Mohammad & Soltani, M. & Hosseinpour, Morteza & Nathwani, Jatin, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis of geothermal energy integration with heavy oil upgrading in hot compressed water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    11. Xie, Kun & Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Analysis and optimization of underground thermal energy storage using depleted oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1006-1016.
    12. Cheng, Wen-Long & Liu, Jian & Nian, Yong-Le & Wang, Chang-Long, 2016. "Enhancing geothermal power generation from abandoned oil wells with thermal reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 537-545.
    13. Kang, Fangchao & Jia, Tianrang & Li, Yingchun & Deng, Jianhui & Tang, Chun'an & Huang, Xin, 2021. "Experimental study on the physical and mechanical variations of hot granite under different cooling treatments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1316-1328.
    14. Juan D. Antolinez & Rahman Miri & Alireza Nouri, 2023. "In Situ Combustion: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Alimonti, C. & Soldo, E. & Bocchetti, D. & Berardi, D., 2018. "The wellbore heat exchangers: A technical review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 353-381.
    16. Cheng, Sharon W.Y. & Kurnia, Jundika C. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2019. "Optimization of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil well with a novel well bottom curvature design utilizing Taguchi method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Song, Weiqiang & Wang, Chunguang & Du, Yukun & Shen, Baotang & Chen, Shaojie & Jiang, Yujing, 2020. "Comparative analysis on the heat transfer efficiency of supercritical CO2 and H2O in the production well of enhanced geothermal system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Yilmaz, Fatih, 2022. "Development and modeling of the geothermal energy based multigeneration plant for beneficial outputs: Thermo-economic and environmental analysis approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1074-1085.
    19. Wang, Dabiao & Ma, Yuezheng & Tian, Ran & Duan, Jie & Hu, Busong & Shi, Lin, 2018. "Thermodynamic evaluation of an ORC system with a Low Pressure Saturated Steam heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 375-385.
    20. Xufeng Yan & Kangsheng Xue & Xiaobo Liu & Xiaolou Chi, 2023. "A Novel Numerical Method for Geothermal Reservoirs Embedded with Fracture Networks and Parameter Optimization for Power Generation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:13:p:5211-:d:1188427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.