IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3049-d798961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflection of the EU Climate Policy Strategic Narrative in the Programmes of Latvian Political Parties—External Convergence and Influence on Shaping Public Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • Lelde Metla-Rozentāle

    (Faculty of European Studies, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

  • Vineta Kleinberga

    (Faculty of European Studies, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

  • Kristiāna Žaunerčika

    (Faculty of European Studies, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

  • Andris Sprūds

    (Faculty of European Studies, Rīga Stradiņš University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia)

Abstract

Climate change, as well as the challenges that come with it, is one of the main issues in international and national politics today. Addressing the threats posed by climate change requires close cooperation at the international level and within each country, creating a dialogue between the political elite and society, thus promoting a common understanding and action across the European Union (EU). The aim of this research is to (1) identify what climate policy narratives are projected to the Latvian electorate (public) and (2) assess how these narratives are aligned with the EU-defined strategic climate policy narrative. The theoretical basis and methodological approach of the study is based on the concept of strategic narrative. It is assumed that the viability and impact of a strategic narrative is enhanced when there is coherence between all stages of the narrative life cycle (i.e., the EU level and the national policy level). The empirical basis of the study is based on the identification of the EU climate policy narrative in the sector’s regulatory documents, as well as an analysis of the election programmes of Latvian political parties (the last European Parliament (2019) and parliamentary (2018) election programmes). The results show that the narrative that the Latvian public receives from its political elite through the European Parliament and the national pre-election programmes is significantly different from the EU strategic narrative on climate policy. Based on the theoretical concept of strategic narrative, it can be concluded that the observed dissimilarity of narratives does not stimulate the inclusion of the Latvian public in the common EU space of climate policy understanding and action.

Suggested Citation

  • Lelde Metla-Rozentāle & Vineta Kleinberga & Kristiāna Žaunerčika & Andris Sprūds, 2022. "Reflection of the EU Climate Policy Strategic Narrative in the Programmes of Latvian Political Parties—External Convergence and Influence on Shaping Public Opinion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3049-:d:798961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3049/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3049/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holmgren, Sara & Pever, Maris & Fischer, Klara, 2019. "Constructing low-carbon futures? Competing storylines in the Estonian energy sector's translation of EU energy goals," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Yoomi Kim & Katsuya Tanaka & Shunji Matsuoka, 2020. "Environmental and economic effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Lehotský, Lukáš & Černoch, Filip & Osička, Jan & Ocelík, Petr, 2019. "When climate change is missing: Media discourse on coal mining in the Czech Republic," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 774-786.
    4. Jarosław Gryz & Barbara Kaczmarczyk, 2021. "Toward Low-Carbon European Union Society: Young Poles’ Perception of Climate Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edy Yusuf Agung Gunanto & Tri Wahyu & Jaka Aminata & Banatul Hayati, 2021. "Convergence CO2 Emission in ASEAN Countries: Augmented Green Solow Model Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 572-578.
    2. Karoliina Isoaho & Jochen Markard, 2020. "The Politics of Technology Decline: Discursive Struggles over Coal Phase‐Out in the UK," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 342-368, May.
    3. Izabela Horzela & Sławomir Gromadzki & Jarosław Gryz & Tomasz Kownacki & Aneta Nowakowska-Krystman & Marzena Piotrowska-Trybull & Radosław Wisniewski, 2021. "Energy Portfolio of the Eastern Poland Macroregion in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-28, December.
    4. Magdalena Tutak & Jarosław Brodny & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Peter Bindzár, 2020. "Studying the Level of Sustainable Energy Development of the European Union Countries and Their Similarity Based on the Economic and Demographic Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Alessandro Sciullo & Gregory Winston Gilcrease & Mario Perugini & Dario Padovan & Barbara Curli & Jay Sterling Gregg & Osman Arrobbio & Erika Meynaerts & Sarah Delvaux & Lucia Polo-Alvarez & Chiara Ca, 2022. "Exploring Institutional and Socio-Economic Settings for the Development of Energy Communities in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Gholami, Alireza & Tokac, Batur & Zhang, Qian, 2024. "Knowledge synthesis on the mine life cycle and the mining value chain to address climate change," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Mariusz Pyra, 2023. "Simulation of the Progress of the Decarbonization Process in Poland’s Road Transport Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Priyanka Morla & Rishi Gupta & Peiman Azarsa & Ashutosh Sharma, 2021. "Corrosion Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Made with Fly Ash and Bottom Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Doan, Nguyen & Doan, Huong & Nguyen, Canh Phuc & Nguyen, Binh Quang, 2024. "From Kyoto to Paris and beyond: A deep dive into the green shift," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Nerea Portillo Juan & Vicente Negro Valdecantos & José María del Campo, 2022. "A New Climate Change Analysis Parameter: A Global or a National Approach Dilemma," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Orkun Davutluoğlu & Abdurrahman Yavuzdeğer & Burak Esenboğa & Özge Demirdelen & Kübra Tümay Ateş & Tuğçe Demirdelen, 2024. "Carbon Emission Analysis and Reporting in Urban Emissions: An Analysis of the Greenhouse Gas Inventories and Climate Action Plans in Sarıçam Municipality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Barbara Kaczmarczyk & Karolina Lis & Anna Bogucka, 2023. "Renewable Energy Management in European Union Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Takuro Uehara & Ryo Sakurai, 2021. "Have Sustainable Development Goal Depictions Functioned as a Nudge for the Younger Generation before and during the COVID-19 Outbreak?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    14. Iwona Markuszewska, 2021. "The Energy Landscape versus the Farming Landscape: The Immortal Era of Coal?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Sivek, Martin & Jirásek, Jakub & Kavina, Pavel & Vojnarová, Markéta & Kurková, Tereza & Bašová, Andrea, 2020. "Divorce after hundreds of years of marriage: Prospects for coal mining in the Czech Republic with regard to the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    16. Cary, Michael & Stephens, Heather M., 2024. "Economic, environmental, and technical gains from the Kyoto Protocol: Evidence from cement manufacturing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Zvonimir Glasnovic & Karmen Margeta & Nataša Zabukovec Logar, 2020. "Humanity Can Still Stop Climate Change by Implementing a New International Climate Agreement and Applying Radical New Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-32, December.
    18. Chen, Bin & Li, Yanlin & Yuan, Mengxue & Shen, Jun & Wang, Sha & Tong, Jianhui & Guo, Yun, 2022. "Study of the Co-pyrolysis characteristics of oil shale with wheat straw based on the hierarchical collection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    19. Sunčana Slijepčević & Željka Kordej-De Villa, 2021. "Public Attitudes toward Renewable Energy in Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Kozera, Agnieszka & Satoła, Łukasz & Standar, Aldona & Dworakowska-Raj, Małgorzata, 2022. "Regional diversity of low-carbon investment support from EU funds in the 2014–2020 financial perspective based on the example of Polish municipalities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3049-:d:798961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.