IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i7p2506-d782227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Carbonate Reservoir Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning and Multiparameter Joint Inversion

Author

Listed:
  • Xingda Tian

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Handong Huang

    (State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, College of Geophysics, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Suo Cheng

    (PetroChina Tarim Oil Field Company, Korla 841000, China)

  • Chao Wang

    (China National Petroleum Corporation, Exploration and Development Institution of Tarim Oilfield, Korla 841000, China)

  • Pengfei Li

    (PetroChina Tarim Oil Field Company, Korla 841000, China)

  • Yaju Hao

    (School of Geophysics and Measurement-Control Technology, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)

Abstract

Deep-water carbonate reservoirs are currently the focus of global oil and gas production activities. The characterization of strongly heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs, especially the prediction of fluids in deep-water presalt carbonate reservoirs, exposes difficulties in reservoir inversion due to their complex structures and weak seismic signals. Therefore, a multiparameter joint inversion method is proposed to comprehensively utilize the information of different seismic angle gathers and the simultaneous inversion of multiple seismic parameters. Compared with the commonly used simultaneous constrained sparse-pulse inversion method, the multiparameter joint inversion method can characterize thinner layers that are consistent with data and can obtain higher-resolution presalt reservoir results. Based on the results of multiparameter joint inversion, in this paper, we further integrate the long short-term memory network algorithm to predict the porosity of presalt reef reservoirs. Compared with a fully connected neural network based on the backpropagation algorithm, the porosity results are in better agreement with the new log porosity curves, with the average porosity of the four wells increasing from 89.48% to 97.76%. The results show that the method, which is based on deep learning and multiparameter joint inversion, can more accurately identify porosity and has good application prospects in the prediction of carbonate reservoirs with complex structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingda Tian & Handong Huang & Suo Cheng & Chao Wang & Pengfei Li & Yaju Hao, 2022. "A Carbonate Reservoir Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning and Multiparameter Joint Inversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2506-:d:782227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/7/2506/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyeong Kyu Choi, 2018. "Stock Price Correlation Coefficient Prediction with ARIMA-LSTM Hybrid Model," Papers 1808.01560, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    2. Neshat, Mehdi & Nezhad, Meysam Majidi & Abbasnejad, Ehsan & Mirjalili, Seyedali & Groppi, Daniele & Heydari, Azim & Tjernberg, Lina Bertling & Astiaso Garcia, Davide & Alexander, Bradley & Shi, Qinfen, 2021. "Wind turbine power output prediction using a new hybrid neuro-evolutionary method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qinguo Zhang & Xiaojian Liu, 2022. "Optimization of the Quality of the Automatic Transmission Shift and the Power Transmission Characteristics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Mahsa Dehghan Manshadi & Milad Mousavi & M. Soltani & Amir Mosavi & Levente Kovacs, 2022. "Deep Learning for Modeling an Offshore Hybrid Wind–Wave Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Jiang, Wenjun & Liu, Bo & Liang, Yang & Gao, Huanxiang & Lin, Pengfei & Zhang, Dongqin & Hu, Gang, 2024. "Applicability analysis of transformer to wind speed forecasting by a novel deep learning framework with multiple atmospheric variables," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 353(PB).
    4. Yang Li & Yi Pan, 2020. "A Novel Ensemble Deep Learning Model for Stock Prediction Based on Stock Prices and News," Papers 2007.12620, arXiv.org.
    5. Frédy Pokou & Jules Sadefo Kamdem & François Benhmad, 2024. "Hybridization of ARIMA with Learning Models for Forecasting of Stock Market Time Series," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 1349-1399, April.
    6. Bhattacharjee, Biplab & Kumar, Rajiv & Senthilkumar, Arunachalam, 2022. "Unidirectional and bidirectional LSTM models for edge weight predictions in dynamic cross-market equity networks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    7. Xiangqing Yin & Yi Liu & Li Yang & Wenchao Gao, 2022. "Abnormal Data Cleaning Method for Wind Turbines Based on Constrained Curve Fitting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Duan, Zhu & Liu, Hui & Li, Ye & Nikitas, Nikolaos, 2022. "Time-variant post-processing method for long-term numerical wind speed forecasts based on multi-region recurrent graph network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    9. Erik Möllerström & Sean Gregory & Aromal Sugathan, 2021. "Improvement of AEP Predictions with Time for Swedish Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Martin Geibel & Galih Bangga, 2022. "Data Reduction and Reconstruction of Wind Turbine Wake Employing Data Driven Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-40, May.
    11. Ashish Sedai & Rabin Dhakal & Shishir Gautam & Anibesh Dhamala & Argenis Bilbao & Qin Wang & Adam Wigington & Suhas Pol, 2023. "Performance Analysis of Statistical, Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models in Long-Term Forecasting of Solar Power Production," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-29, February.
    12. Wu, Binrong & Wang, Lin & Zeng, Yu-Rong, 2022. "Interpretable wind speed prediction with multivariate time series and temporal fusion transformers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    13. Abou Houran, Mohamad & Salman Bukhari, Syed M. & Zafar, Muhammad Hamza & Mansoor, Majad & Chen, Wenjie, 2023. "COA-CNN-LSTM: Coati optimization algorithm-based hybrid deep learning model for PV/wind power forecasting in smart grid applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    14. Li Yan & Zhengyu Zhu & Xiaopeng Kang & Boyang Qu & Baihao Qiao & Jiajia Huan & Xuzhao Chai, 2022. "Multi-Objective Dynamic Economic Emission Dispatch with Electric Vehicle–Wind Power Interaction Based on a Self-Adaptive Multiple-Learning Harmony-Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Bilal, Boudy & Adjallah, Kondo Hloindo & Sava, Alexandre & Yetilmezsoy, Kaan & Kıyan, Emel, 2022. "Wind power conversion system model identification using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems: A case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    16. El Amine Cherrat & Snehal Raj & Iordanis Kerenidis & Abhishek Shekhar & Ben Wood & Jon Dee & Shouvanik Chakrabarti & Richard Chen & Dylan Herman & Shaohan Hu & Pierre Minssen & Ruslan Shaydulin & Yue , 2023. "Quantum Deep Hedging," Papers 2303.16585, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    17. Ma, Huixin & Zhang, Chu & Peng, Tian & Nazir, Muhammad Shahzad & Li, Yiman, 2022. "An integrated framework of gated recurrent unit based on improved sine cosine algorithm for photovoltaic power forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Neshat, Mehdi & Nezhad, Meysam Majidi & Sergiienko, Nataliia Y. & Mirjalili, Seyedali & Piras, Giuseppe & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2022. "Wave power forecasting using an effective decomposition-based convolutional Bi-directional model with equilibrium Nelder-Mead optimiser," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    19. Muhyaddin Rawa, 2022. "Towards Avoiding Cascading Failures in Transmission Expansion Planning of Modern Active Power Systems Using Hybrid Snake-Sine Cosine Optimization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:7:p:2506-:d:782227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.